hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
The Daily Dispatch: November 26, 1863., [Electronic resource] 14 0 Browse Search
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 20. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) 2 0 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Your search returned 16 results in 2 document sections:

Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 20. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones), chapter 1.29 (search)
R. E. Lee, No. 1, Richmond, Virginia, T. P. Pollard. No. 2. Maury, No. 2, Fredericksburg, Virginia, Thomas F. Procter, No. 3. Pickett-Buchanan, Norfolk, Virginia, Walter F. Irvine. No. 4. Stonewall, Portsmouth, Virginia, R. C. Marshall. No. 5. R. E. Lee, No. 2, Alexandria, Virginia, William A. Smoot. No. 6. A. P. Hill, No. 6, Petersburg, Virginia, W. Gordon Mc-Cabe. No. 7. ClintonHatcher, Leesburg, Virginia, E. V. White. No. 8. Sam. Garland, Lynchburg, Virginia, Kirk Otey. No. 9. George E. Pickett, Richmond Virginia, R. N. Northen. No. 10. R. E. Lee, No. 3, Hampton, Virginia, A. S. Segar. No. 11. Urquhart-Gillette, Courtland, Virginia, L. R. Edwards, Franklin, Virginia. No. 12. John R. Cooke, West Point, Virginia, H. M. Miller. No. 13. William Watts, Roanoke, Virginia, S. S. Brooke. No. 14. John Bowie Strange, Charlottesville, Virginia, J. M. Garnett. No. 15. Pierre Gibson, No. 15, Culpeper, Virginia, D. A. Grimsley. No. 16. Callco
ight, 2d Lt. commanding Co. H, 11th Va. regiment, and approved by Kirk Otey, Major commanding 11th Va, regiment. In the return to the wrB. Wright, who signed the said paper as 2d Lieut. commanding, and Major Otey, who signed as Major commanding the 11th Va. regiment, were not wuction, and there mustered in, and that neither said Wright nor said Otey had any right or authority to receive substitutes in service. Apport of the allegations of the return, showing that both Wright and Otey were in Lynchburg at the time of signing the paper and receiving thehe discharge was claimed. A paper was also Introduced, signed by Major Otey, purporting to be a descriptive list of said Farley, and a receipor General of the C. S. Army; that the descriptive list signed by Major Otey was inconsistent with the first paper upon which the petitioner claimed his discharge, and that no such man was receipted for by Major Otey, was ever in the possession or under the control of Col. J. C. Shie