Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: July 30, 1861., [Electronic resource]. You can also browse the collection for Patterson or search for Patterson in all documents.

Your search returned 7 results in 3 document sections:

The Daily Dispatch: July 30, 1861., [Electronic resource], Runaway (search)
ing enemy, and the movement will continue until that able General and veteran soldier presents himself before the city of St. Louis. In Western Virginia, Gen. Wise's retrograde movement will be only temporary. He will soon be reinforced, and will be able to force the enemy eventually across the Ohio river. In Randolph county, Gen. Loring, with a strong column, will re-appear at Laurel Hill and Rich Mountain, and push the enemy back to Grafton, to Whoeling, and into Pennsylvania or Ohio. Patterson will be superseded in Jefferson county, and that column of the enemy despairing of forcing their way through Winchester, will probably go to Washington, to aid in protecting the Capital from capture. Everywhere will the movements of our armies be aggressive, and the enemy are to learn that the valor of our troops is as irresistible in assault as when standing for attack, sustained by their pot abommation, those terrible "marked batteries." Two great objects will occupy the attent
The Daily Dispatch: July 30, 1861., [Electronic resource], article 1 (search)
could only be practiced by a fear of a night attack. Twelve or fourteen regiments are ordered to Harper's Ferry, to supply the vacancies created by deserters and the absence of those whose time has expired. The feeling of the privates in Patterson's command is varied.--Some say that they will not serve under the " Abolition General" Banks, who they have no confidence in. McMullen's Rangers and the Scott Legion, who served with honor in the Mexican campaign, intend to go home.--On the othivates in Patterson's command is varied.--Some say that they will not serve under the " Abolition General" Banks, who they have no confidence in. McMullen's Rangers and the Scott Legion, who served with honor in the Mexican campaign, intend to go home.--On the other hand, some from the interior of the State are loud in their criticisms of the military movements of Patterson, claiming for him the title of "rebel" and " traitor," saying he should have attacked Johnston, or cut off his retreat.
The Daily Dispatch: July 30, 1861., [Electronic resource], Runaway (search)
e on General Scott to march before he was ready. His plan of marching in a common onset the three Generals, McClellan, Patterson and Mcdowel', has failed in the haste in which McDowell has been driven on to the attack by "Public Opinion" made in Neen. McDowell has fallen back upon his entrenchments at Alexandria. The junction of Johnston with Beauregard it was General Patterson's business to prevent. It is not right to blame a commander without knowing all the circumstances which controlledbordinates falls at last upon the Commander-in-Chief. Nevertheless, it is impossible not to see that the army corps of Patterson has not performed its very important share in the general attack, and that in this way only is the temporary retreat of Capital. Baltimore will probably give trouble now, and our forces there and elsewhere in Maryland are in real peril. Patterson's command is also exposed and liable to be cut off or defeated by a rapid movement of the enemy. [From the Newark