Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: March 18, 1863., [Electronic resource]. You can also browse the collection for W. H. Seward or search for W. H. Seward in all documents.

Your search returned 14 results in 3 document sections:

of this tremendous American revolution for themselves." Discussing the conflicting statements of Seward and Mercier, relative to the latter's mission to Richmond, the Times regrets Seward's denial of Seward's denial of the humane act impaled to him by Mercier, which would reflect credit on him, and, at the expense of Mr. Seward's veracity, expresses the belief that Seward did listen to Mercier's counsels. The LMr. Seward's veracity, expresses the belief that Seward did listen to Mercier's counsels. The London Globe thinks it the duty of either France or the United States to demand an apology for the contradiction existing between Seward and Mercier. The Kangaroo, from Liverpool, arrived on the 1Seward did listen to Mercier's counsels. The London Globe thinks it the duty of either France or the United States to demand an apology for the contradiction existing between Seward and Mercier. The Kangaroo, from Liverpool, arrived on the 11th and brought 825 bales of cotton. The City of Baltimore brought 369 bales. Mr. Alexander Ramsay appeared and was sworn in as U. S. Senator from Minnesota on Thursday. An engagement betweSeward and Mercier. The Kangaroo, from Liverpool, arrived on the 11th and brought 825 bales of cotton. The City of Baltimore brought 369 bales. Mr. Alexander Ramsay appeared and was sworn in as U. S. Senator from Minnesota on Thursday. An engagement between Russians and Polish insurgents is reported, lasting eight hours. The Russians were defeated and fled, and took refuge on Prussian territory. In Liverpool American cotton advanced ¼ to ½ penny,
Latest from Europe. Seward's Rejection of French mediation — the Confederate loan — the revolution in Poland, &c. hich payment was required by the British ultimatum. Mr. Seward's dispatch, rejecting the Emperor Napoleon's last proposonsiderable comment: The London Times asserts that Mr. Seward. If not, preternaturally right, is incomprehensibly wrong; and after quoting and commenting on Mr. Seward's view of the position of affairs in its article, concludes as follows: "ffairs is consistent — consistent, that is with all that Mr. Seward has written from the beginning. It is the very story, wuch rather leave to be decided by events than argue with Mr. Seward at present." The London Morning Post is very bitteooks upon it as mere "buncombe." It says: "Perhaps Mr. Seward expects to gain in Washington, amongst certain classes, replied to the proposition of mediation made by France. Mr. Seward considers it impossible to open immediate negotiations f<
The New York Democrats. We are not at all surprised at the facility with which the Northern Democrats have vaulted from their position of opposition to the war to a fervent support of Abraham Lincoln and his Stars and Stripes. We expressed at the time our conviction that not the slightest confidence was to be put in anything they might say or do. John Van Buren in particular was begotten by the most unprincipled politician that even New York ever saw, (with the single exception of W. H. Seward.) and he could not be the legitimate son of Martin unless he was perfectly unreliable in every word and action. It is a matter of little importance, however, what they may say or do. They cannot be more united than they were at the beginning of the war; more ferocious and intent on destruction. We fear their arms less than their arts. --They have been slaughtered like sheep wherever they have invaded Virginia, and a like fate, we verily believe, awaits them in the future. They may howl