hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
Frederick H. Dyer, Compendium of the War of the Rebellion: Regimental Histories 1,604 0 Browse Search
Harper's Encyclopedia of United States History (ed. Benson Lossing) 760 0 Browse Search
James D. Porter, Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 7.1, Tennessee (ed. Clement Anselm Evans) 530 0 Browse Search
Colonel William Preston Johnston, The Life of General Albert Sidney Johnston : His Service in the Armies of the United States, the Republic of Texas, and the Confederate States. 404 0 Browse Search
Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events, Diary from December 17, 1860 - April 30, 1864 (ed. Frank Moore) 382 0 Browse Search
A Roster of General Officers , Heads of Departments, Senators, Representatives , Military Organizations, &c., &c., in Confederate Service during the War between the States. (ed. Charles C. Jones, Jr. Late Lieut. Colonel of Artillery, C. S. A.) 346 0 Browse Search
Benson J. Lossing, Pictorial Field Book of the Civil War. Volume 3. 330 0 Browse Search
Adam Badeau, Military history of Ulysses S. Grant from April 1861 to April 1865. Volume 3 312 0 Browse Search
Adam Badeau, Military history of Ulysses S. Grant from April 1861 to April 1865. Volume 2 312 0 Browse Search
Benson J. Lossing, Pictorial Field Book of the Civil War. Volume 2. 310 0 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in John M. Schofield, Forty-six years in the Army. You can also browse the collection for Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) or search for Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) in all documents.

Your search returned 121 results in 14 document sections:

John M. Schofield, Forty-six years in the Army, Chapter IV (search)
of the army of the Frontier absent through illness battle of Prairie Grove compelled to be Inactive transferred to Tennessee in command of Thomas's old Division of the Fourteenth Corps reappointed Major General a Hibernian Striker. on No From the position of St. Louis as the source of supplies, Missouri ought not to be separated from Arkansas and western Tennessee. What will be done in the matter I do not know. Yours truly, H. W. Halleck. None of our Western generalect of grave charges and bitter attacks. Powerful influences were at work to supersede him in command of the army in west Tennessee. Had there been any available general at that time capable of commanding public confidence, the military idea would sh intrigue in Kansas, Missouri, and Washington; but he could and did promptly respond to my request, and ordered me to Tennessee, where I could be associated with soldiers who were capable of appreciating soldierly qualities. One of the happiest d
John M. Schofield, Forty-six years in the Army, Chapter VI (search)
be killed or driven out of the State unless there shall be a change. In particular, no loyal man who has been disarmed is named, but the affidavits show, by name, forty-two persons as disloyal who have been armed. They are as follows: [Names omitted.] A majority of these are shown to have been in the rebel service. I believe it could be shown that the government here has deliberately armed more than ten times as many captured at Gettysburg, to say nothing of similar operations in East Tennessee. These papers contain altogether thirty-one manuscript pages, and one newspaper in extenso; and yet I do not find it anywhere charged in them that any loyal man has been harmed by reason of being disarmed, or that any disloyal one has harmed anybody by reason of being armed by the Federal or State government. Of course I have not had time to carefully examine all; but I have had most of them examined and briefed by others, and the result is as stated. The remarkable fact that the ac
John M. Schofield, Forty-six years in the Army, Chapter VII (search)
,000 animals with which General Burnside had gone into East Tennessee, scarcely 1000 remained fit for service; while his armhe Confederate army under Longstreet still remained in East Tennessee. A movement had recently been made by our troops, undiety was felt in Washington regarding the situation in East Tennessee. It was even apprehended that Knoxville might be in dore than observe Longstreet as he leisurely withdrew from Tennessee and joined Lee in Virginia, and prepare for the campaign rnment could not afford to leave Longstreet's force in East Tennessee during the summer. He must join Lee or Johnston befor public reports of what had been done, or not done, in East Tennessee, and the Military Committee of the Senate reported agausy of my senior brother commanders of the Cumberland and Tennessee. My first care was to provide my men with all necessarordinate position in the campaigns of 1864 in Georgia and Tennessee, I shall not attempt to write a full account of those cam
John M. Schofield, Forty-six years in the Army, Chapter IX (search)
war from Georgia to Alabama, Mississippi, or Tennessee. Sherman very promptly decided not to acccted movement of Hood, was to send back into Tennessee force enough, in addition to the troops then the event of his attempting the invasion of Tennessee and Kentucky, or to pursue and occupy his ati, about ten thousand strong, was ordered to Tennessee, and Sherman also ordered Stanley, with the elve thousand men, to return from Georgia to Tennessee and report to Thomas. Stanley had started bnd what troops he had provided for Thomas in Tennessee. I told Sherman, with that perfect candor wtand my suggestion as a desire to be left in Tennessee instead of Thomas, the latter to go with Shented that Thomas was to command the army in Tennessee, and I wanted only to go back and help him bather than any other, should be sent back to Tennessee in order that it might be filled up by new ry later. The season of Hood's invasion of Tennessee was extremely unfavorable for aggressive ope[3 more...]
John M. Schofield, Forty-six years in the Army, Chapter XI (search)
o report with the Twenty-third Corps to General Thomas in Tennessee, I felt in the fullest degree all the deference and respety in years and rank and services. When I went back to Tennessee my only anxiety respecting the situation, so far as Generrom this statement of troops available for service in middle Tennessee those in Kentucky and East Tennessee, belonging to tEast Tennessee, belonging to the Department of the Ohio, for the reason that just at that time unusual demand was made upon those troops for service in EaEast Tennessee, where some of the State forces had met with disaster. This probably accounts in part for the discrepancies inassume the offensive. Hood's force was ready to invade Tennessee in one compact army, while Thomas then had in the field or capture of nearly everything in the rear, not only in Tennessee, but also in Kentucky, except perhaps Nashville and Chatt, part i, p. 33. Some of these troops had been sent to East Tennessee, as well as all the mounted troops available in Kentuc
John M. Schofield, Forty-six years in the Army, Chapter XIII (search)
rd the War. the perilous character of the situation in Tennessee, in which it was left by Sherman's premature start for thisapprehension as to the degree in which the situation in Tennessee had been changed by the battle of Franklin; as well as toexplained to General Sherman, I volunteered to go back to Tennessee, not to supersede Thomas, but to help him. I knew him ands, City Point, Va. General: My corps was sent back to Tennessee by General Sherman, instead of remaining with him on his ough after it became evident that Hood designed to invade Tennessee; and, second, in order that I might fill up my corps from the new troops then arriving in Tennessee. These reasons now no longer exist. By uniting my troops with Stanley's, we werewo thirds of whom are the veterans of the campaigns of East Tennessee and Georgia: a small force, it is true, yet one which s he is mad, must forever relinquish all hope of bringing Tennessee again within the lines of the accursed rebellion; but the
John M. Schofield, Forty-six years in the Army, Chapter XIV (search)
it was ample in quantity and efficient in quality on both sides, and need not be compared. This formidable army was now in Hood's immediate front at Nashville, while the important strategic points of Murfreesboroa and Chattanooga were strongly garrisoned and fortified, and the railroads strongly guarded. It had become too late for Hood even to attempt a raid into Kentucky. Thomas would have been close upon his rear with an army at least twice as strong, with all the important points in Tennessee still securely held. But successful operations against Nashville were far less possible to Hood than an invasion of Kentucky. While no commander could possibly think of destroying his own army by assaulting a fortified place in which the garrison was more than double his own strength, or indulge the hope of any valuable results from a less than half investment of such a place, so bold a commander as Hood might possibly attempt a raid into Kentucky, as the only thing he could possibly do
John M. Schofield, Forty-six years in the Army, Chapter XV (search)
al Grant. after I parted from General Thomas in Tennessee, having at our last meeting there congratulated hi even seen the official reports of the campaign in Tennessee, they having been made public while I was in Europ time General Thomas's report of the operations in Tennessee. If I did, there was nothing in it to attract my l the published records of the campaign of 1864 in Tennessee, for the purpose of doing exact justice to the prithe movements of Hood, and retard his advance into Tennessee as much as possible, without risking a general engd not, at the time I went back to report to him in Tennessee, any anxiety about his inability to cope with Hoodct to defensive action against Hood's advance into Tennessee, which I had so properly appreciated and executed,r the event, or at least after Hood's advance into Tennessee had actually begun, and after I had, in my telegrawhen he intrusted to me the command of his army in Tennessee, from Pulaski through Columbia, Spring Hill, and F
John M. Schofield, Forty-six years in the Army, Chapter XVI (search)
hed the base of his projected operations in Tennessee, would turn back and follow Sherman at such from Chattanooga to Atlanta, and may move to Tennessee by Decatur. He cannot cross the Tennessee e from Eastport to Jackson, Paris, and the lower Tennessee; and General Thomas reports the capture blonging to me, but I doubt if they can reach Tennessee in less than ten days. If I were to let go Aood can't get our supplies, he can't stay in Tennessee long. General Schofield will go to you as r direct operations against Hood by Thomas in Tennessee were very materially more complete than theyI am now perfecting arrangements to put into Tennessee a force able to hold the line of the Tennesspaign was passed; and the effective force in Tennessee before Smith's arrival was 13,000 men less tsurance as to what he had done for Thomas in Tennessee, Grant appears to have been fully satisfied nt, had Sherman anticipated these results in Tennessee, and matured his plans of future operations,[20 more...]
John M. Schofield, Forty-six years in the Army, Chapter XVII (search)
ity as a strategist. the actual result in Tennessee was more decisive than Sherman had any good siderable damage, to drive the latter out of Tennessee and pursue him with such force and energy as be the result of operations against Hood in Tennessee, it was a difficult and delicate question toould have been no risk of serious results in Tennessee. In connection with Sherman's operations esult of the operations of a larger force in Tennessee had been as decisive as they actually were w to Atlanta all of the troops he had sent to Tennessee, and thus marched toward Virginia with eightrestored until Hood was actually defeated in Tennessee. I have referred to the possibilities of ally broken up, by Sherman's subordinates in Tennessee, slows clearly enough what kind of modificatcredit for the breaking up of Hood's army in Tennessee, while he was marching to Savannah, as a legose that prompted Sherman to send me back to Tennessee was to serve as a decoy to Hood, I must say