hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
Frederick H. Dyer, Compendium of the War of the Rebellion: Regimental Histories 1,604 0 Browse Search
Harper's Encyclopedia of United States History (ed. Benson Lossing) 760 0 Browse Search
James D. Porter, Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 7.1, Tennessee (ed. Clement Anselm Evans) 530 0 Browse Search
Colonel William Preston Johnston, The Life of General Albert Sidney Johnston : His Service in the Armies of the United States, the Republic of Texas, and the Confederate States. 404 0 Browse Search
Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events, Diary from December 17, 1860 - April 30, 1864 (ed. Frank Moore) 382 0 Browse Search
A Roster of General Officers , Heads of Departments, Senators, Representatives , Military Organizations, &c., &c., in Confederate Service during the War between the States. (ed. Charles C. Jones, Jr. Late Lieut. Colonel of Artillery, C. S. A.) 346 0 Browse Search
Benson J. Lossing, Pictorial Field Book of the Civil War. Volume 3. 330 0 Browse Search
Adam Badeau, Military history of Ulysses S. Grant from April 1861 to April 1865. Volume 3 312 0 Browse Search
Adam Badeau, Military history of Ulysses S. Grant from April 1861 to April 1865. Volume 2 312 0 Browse Search
Benson J. Lossing, Pictorial Field Book of the Civil War. Volume 2. 310 0 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: April 2, 1862., [Electronic resource]. You can also browse the collection for Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) or search for Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) in all documents.

Your search returned 10 results in 3 document sections:

The Daily Dispatch: April 2, 1862., [Electronic resource], article 19 (search)
resolution to the Military of the Judiciary Committee, during which Senators from Georgia and Tennessee set up claims for their separate States as to the superiority of iron in their several States. It was finally adopted, and referred to the Military Committee. Mr. Haynes, of Tennessee, offered the following: Resolved, That the Committee on Military Affairs inquire into the expedie small arms, and appropriating half a million of dollars for the purpose. Mr. Haynes, of Tennessee, argued in favor of this location of a national foundry, on the ground that it afforded plentienty of wind. Mr. Hill. Yes, but she has no east wind, as the gentleman's State, had an East Tennessee; but for East Tennessee, he felt assured the gentleman [Mr. Haynes] had no blame. The rEast Tennessee, he felt assured the gentleman [Mr. Haynes] had no blame. The resolution was adopted, and the reference made. Mr. Wigfall, from the Committee on Military Affairs, introduced a "bill to raise an army for the Confederate States, and to make rules for the regul
The Daily Dispatch: April 2, 1862., [Electronic resource], Unionism in the South. (search)
Patriotic response. Although a seeming indifference has been manifested by the business men and large property holders of Richmond to the noble and patriotic proposition of Col. Blanton Dundan, of Kentucky, for the construction of a first class iron-clad gunboat, is seems that that proposition has attracted attention elsewhere. We append a note from a gentleman in Tennessee which speaks for itself, and which we recommend to those interested in preserving the city from the tread of the vandal hordes of Lincoln: Athens, Thin., March 28, 1862. To the Richmond Dispatch: I second Col. Duncante motion for the new gunboat Richmond by subscribing $500. Let the work commence. Yours, respectfully, Milton P. Jarnagin.
The Daily Dispatch: April 2, 1862., [Electronic resource], House of Representatives. Tuesday, April 1, 1862. (search)
s House. But what are the facts? The resolutions were adopted but twenty days age, upon the motion of the member from Tennessee, (Mr. Foote,) whose propensity to be inquisitive the House had thought proper to indulge. These resolutions embraced euch a torrent of vituperation and bitterness towards the late Secretary of War as had escaped the lips of the member of Tennessee. He desired simply to present a brief statement, showing that that distinguished functionary did not merit censure, eirtant results depend, to make an answer even upon the subjects embraced in the interrogatories. The gentleman from Tennessee had earnestly disclaimed a purpose to reflect censure upon the late Secretary; but still it seemed apparent that such wWar or any one else, as had been intimated; further than to ask that simple justice be accorded. If the gentleman from Tennessee could survive the effect of his own assaults, he was quite sure that that officer could outlive them. The gentleman ha