hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
Harper's Encyclopedia of United States History (ed. Benson Lossing) 6,437 1 Browse Search
Richard Hakluyt, The Principal Navigations, Voyages, Traffiques, and Discoveries of the English Nation 1,858 0 Browse Search
Knight's Mechanical Encyclopedia (ed. Knight) 766 0 Browse Search
Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events: Documents and Narratives, Volume 1. (ed. Frank Moore) 310 0 Browse Search
Admiral David D. Porter, The Naval History of the Civil War. 302 0 Browse Search
Raphael Semmes, Memoirs of Service Afloat During the War Between the States 300 0 Browse Search
Hon. J. L. M. Curry , LL.D., William Robertson Garrett , A. M. , Ph.D., Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 1.1, Legal Justification of the South in secession, The South as a factor in the territorial expansion of the United States (ed. Clement Anselm Evans) 266 0 Browse Search
Henry Morton Stanley, Dorothy Stanley, The Autobiography of Sir Henry Morton Stanley 224 0 Browse Search
George Bancroft, History of the United States from the Discovery of the American Continent, Vol. 5, 13th edition. 222 0 Browse Search
Horace Greeley, The American Conflict: A History of the Great Rebellion in the United States of America, 1860-65: its Causes, Incidents, and Results: Intended to exhibit especially its moral and political phases with the drift and progress of American opinion respecting human slavery from 1776 to the close of the War for the Union. Volume I. 214 0 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: October 6, 1862., [Electronic resource]. You can also browse the collection for England (United Kingdom) or search for England (United Kingdom) in all documents.

Your search returned 1 result in 1 document section:

ic of the Times, We wish it would be candid, and say at once what, in its view, constitutes good ground for recognition. Is a State to be recognized because she is too weak to establish her independence, or is she to be recognized because she is strong enough to maintain it? We wish to know from curiosity merely, not that it is a matter of any importance to us. We seriously believe, as we have heretofore had occasion to remark, that recognition without a powerful intervention — such as Great Britain is not likely to make — would be productive of well rather thin injury. Such an intervention as is implied in a blockable would throw into the hands of the Yankee Government whole classes of men to recruit their armies by them out of other employment, and leaving them no alternative but to fight or starve. It would strengthen their financial status, by shutting them out from the world, and confining their circulation entirely to themselves. Recognition and intervention, therefore, u