hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
Harper's Encyclopedia of United States History (ed. Benson Lossing) 836 0 Browse Search
Frederick H. Dyer, Compendium of the War of the Rebellion: Regimental Histories 690 0 Browse Search
Horace Greeley, The American Conflict: A History of the Great Rebellion in the United States of America, 1860-65: its Causes, Incidents, and Results: Intended to exhibit especially its moral and political phases with the drift and progress of American opinion respecting human slavery from 1776 to the close of the War for the Union. Volume I. 532 0 Browse Search
John M. Schofield, Forty-six years in the Army 480 0 Browse Search
Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events: Documents and Narratives, Volume 2. (ed. Frank Moore) 406 0 Browse Search
Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events, Diary from December 17, 1860 - April 30, 1864 (ed. Frank Moore) 350 0 Browse Search
Wiley Britton, Memoirs of the Rebellion on the Border 1863. 332 0 Browse Search
Benson J. Lossing, Pictorial Field Book of the Civil War. Volume 2. 322 0 Browse Search
Col. John M. Harrell, Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 10.2, Arkansas (ed. Clement Anselm Evans) 310 0 Browse Search
Col. John C. Moore, Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 9.2, Missouri (ed. Clement Anselm Evans) 294 0 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 2. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.). You can also browse the collection for Missouri (Missouri, United States) or search for Missouri (Missouri, United States) in all documents.

Your search returned 33 results in 4 document sections:

Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 2. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.), Book II:—the naval war. (search)
elf at Mill Springs. Buell commanded the army of the Ohio, which he had so opportunely led to the battle-field of Shiloh, comprising the divisions of McCook, Wood, Nelson and Crittenden. The army of the Mississippi, which Pope had brought from Missouri, and to which Curtis had contributed some reinforcements from Arkansas, consisted of the five small divisions of Stanley, Hamilton, Palmer, Paine and Plummer; a distinguished officer, General Granger, commanded its cavalry. The reserve was compe President to make it an independent department. He placed it in charge of General Hunter, a meritorious officer, cool and resolute, who had the reputation of possessing great good sense and experience, and whom we have already seen at work in Missouri. General Benham proceeded to Tybee to assume command of the troops assembled there, and all those stationed south of the Savannah River; General Viele, who was placed under him, continued to direct the special operations on the left bank of the
Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 2. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.), Book IV:—Kentucky (search)
without compromising his communications with Missouri, whence he derived all his supplies. He, thehus left the western counties of Arkansas and Missouri at the mercy of all the small bands which hise same period, the volunteers, raised in Northern Missouri and the young States of Iowa and Minnesog to invade the w<*> counties of Arkansas and Missouri. Three regiments of <*> cavalry in the Feder not slow to avail themselves—the exposure of Missouri herself. Since the battle of Belmont this St was confided the exclusive duty of occupying Missouri, the Federal troops lately stationed in that s left the southern frontier unprotected, and Missouri was open to the incursions of the Confederatehite River, seemed to be preparing to invade Missouri and march upon Rolla, the most important of tof all the available forces scattered through Missouri, and of those of Blunt, stationed in Kansas; ese heights, Schofield was able to cover Southern Missouri and menace the whole Arkansas valley. S[6 more...]
Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 2. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.), Book V:—Tennessee. (search)
Book V:—Tennessee. Chapter 1: Chickasaw Bayou. WE have just seen, west of the Mississippi, the Federals remaining at the end of the year masters of the State of Missouri and a portion of Arkansas. Their efforts to extend their power farther south, on the very borders of the Mississippi, and especially on the east bank, in the State which bears that name, had not been so successful. These efforts, however, showed the way they were determined to follow with the utmost perseverance. ies, manoeuvring upon open ground, could rapidly concentrate all their forces near the point menaced. Blair, however, carried the breastworks extending at the foot of the hills, while his soldiers, who had been trained in the rough campaigns of Missouri and Arkansas, began boldly to climb the slopes swept by the projectiles of the enemy; their efforts, however, against the constantly increasing number of their adversaries proved unavailing. No help reached them, no diversion was made in their
Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 2. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.), Book VII:—politics. (search)
uthorized the raising of Federal regiments in Missouri. As that State was divided between the two pPotomac, of the Ohio, of the Tennessee and of Missouri. Enlisted for a period which seemed very loprocess of law. In such States as Kentucky or Missouri, where the two antagonistic parties faced eacg march, were preparing to demolish. But in Missouri, where the war assumed quite a different charzed nations to go unpunished. Lawless men in Missouri took advantage of the state of war to indulgesement of all slaves belonging to citizens of Missouri who had shown themselves hostile to the Federby keeping back a portion of their wages. In Missouri, however, General Halleck seemed to make it arebounding effect upon Maryland, Kentucky and Missouri, despite all the provisions of the law which es of Kentucky, Maryland, Virginia, Delaware, Missouri and Tennessee, it would have involved an expeicipated in the rebellion; nor to Kentucky or Missouri, which, although rent by civil war, had not v[3 more...]