hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
Harper's Encyclopedia of United States History (ed. Benson Lossing) 836 0 Browse Search
Frederick H. Dyer, Compendium of the War of the Rebellion: Regimental Histories 690 0 Browse Search
Horace Greeley, The American Conflict: A History of the Great Rebellion in the United States of America, 1860-65: its Causes, Incidents, and Results: Intended to exhibit especially its moral and political phases with the drift and progress of American opinion respecting human slavery from 1776 to the close of the War for the Union. Volume I. 532 0 Browse Search
John M. Schofield, Forty-six years in the Army 480 0 Browse Search
Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events: Documents and Narratives, Volume 2. (ed. Frank Moore) 406 0 Browse Search
Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events, Diary from December 17, 1860 - April 30, 1864 (ed. Frank Moore) 350 0 Browse Search
Wiley Britton, Memoirs of the Rebellion on the Border 1863. 332 0 Browse Search
Benson J. Lossing, Pictorial Field Book of the Civil War. Volume 2. 322 0 Browse Search
Col. John M. Harrell, Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 10.2, Arkansas (ed. Clement Anselm Evans) 310 0 Browse Search
Col. John C. Moore, Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 9.2, Missouri (ed. Clement Anselm Evans) 294 0 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: May 5, 1864., [Electronic resource]. You can also browse the collection for Missouri (Missouri, United States) or search for Missouri (Missouri, United States) in all documents.

Your search returned 1 result in 1 document section:

The Daily Dispatch: May 5, 1864., [Electronic resource], The News. (search)
t is unconstitutional to keep the country together. But, as it was not unconstitutional to form the Union, why should it be unconstitutional to maintain it? Why, the Union was tore in force, and it is absurd to say it cannot be maintained by force. But some one says that it is impossible that a people fighting on their own soil should be conquered. I deny that it is their soil any more than it is mine or yours. They have forfeited by their conduct all right and title to it. But look at Missouri, Arkansas, Kentucky, Western Virginia, etc. These are my answers to people who speak of impossibilities. From the beginning our course has been steadily onward, and so it will go on — We must and shall succeed. Nor is the day of our triumph far distant. I believe the issues will culminate in this campaign. I believe if the Presidential election were three years off there would be no rebels in the field to-day. They are hoping for a change of Administration, but it is a vain hope.--Our