hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
HISTORY OF THE TOWN OF MEDFORD, Middlesex County, Massachusetts, FROM ITS FIRST SETTLEMENT, IN 1630, TO THE PRESENT TIME, 1855. (ed. Charles Brooks) 8 0 Browse Search
Lucius R. Paige, History of Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1630-1877, with a genealogical register 2 0 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Your search returned 10 results in 2 document sections:

HISTORY OF THE TOWN OF MEDFORD, Middlesex County, Massachusetts, FROM ITS FIRST SETTLEMENT, IN 1630, TO THE PRESENT TIME, 1855. (ed. Charles Brooks), chapter 18 (search)
4Mary. m. William Bettis.  35James.  36Samuel.  37Theodore L.  38Charles H.  39Benjamin F.  40Edward. 28 1/2-30Edward Wade m. Rebecca Harnden, June 10, 1770, and had--  30-41Edward, b. Mar. 5, 1780.  42Fitch, unm.  43Henry. unm.  44Rebe9-39Benjamin F. Wade m. Caroline Rosencrans, and had--  39-61James Wade, 3d, b. 1843.  62Henry, b. Aug., 1845. 29-40Edward Wade m. Sarah Louisa Atkins, and has--  40-63William O., b. Sept. 4, 1837.  64Sarah F., b. Mar. 15, 1840. 30-41Edward WaEdward Wade m. Nancy Hoskins, Oct. 26, 1814; and d. Nov. 27, 1836, leaving--  41-65Fitch.  66Esther, m. Isaac Wetherbee.  67Elizabeth, m. Daniel Hitchins.  68Martha, m. Abiel Winship. I find, in the church records, a copy of the inscription on the Wade e following is copied from a communication of Turell Tufts, Esq.; there is apparently some error in it.--C. Stetson. Major Wade's tomb was purchased by the late Ebenezer Hall, and is now in possession of his children. The old tablet re
Lucius R. Paige, History of Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1630-1877, with a genealogical register, Chapter 13: civil History. (search)
d receive damages for land used in the construction of a road which he so much desired, and for which he had so long been earnestly striving, petitioned the Court of Sessions in December, 1809, for the appointment of a jury, to determine whether any and what damages said Craigie has sustained by means of said road, alleging that in fact said Craigie sustained no damages. At the next term of the Court, in March, 1810, it was ordered that a jury be empanelled, and at the next term in June, Edward Wade, Coroner, returned the verdict of the jury, and the case was continued to December, when the verdict was set aside by the Court, and it was ordered that another jury be empanelled. The case was then continued to March, and again to June, 1811, when Nathan Fiske, Coroner, returned the verdict of the jury, which the Court set aside, and continued the case to the next September, when neither party appeared. On petition of the town of Cambridge, setting forth that two cases in which said