Your search returned 10 results in 4 document sections:

Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 15. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones), Terry's Brigade, formerly John M. Jones's. (search)
Sergeant P. H. Caldwell, 4th Sergeant Dan'l Colman, 1st Corporal Nathaniel Prewitt, 2d Corporal C. A. Woodson, Private Hugh Cassidy, G. M. Cumbee, P. R. Driskill, Patrick Horn, W. S. Hodges, James Kevan, Joseph Kinsley, L. H. Kefarever, Thos. Lawler, Private C. M. Pettus, John Powers, Charles Patton, Eli Polk, Robt. Prewitt, Pat. Reilley, J. H. Stevens, J. G. Sharitz, J. W. Thompson, J. H. Tucker, Samuel B. Ragland, clerk in office of Pro. Mar. John G. Wade, clerk in office of Pro. Mar. Co. C. 2d Sergeant Humphrey Jeffers, 3d Sergeant John A. Ryan, Corporal Richard Dunnovan, Private R. T. Bradshaw, John Collins, Jno. Cannon, Sidney Cosby, Carn S. Carter, Andrew Dodson, Private G. W. Elam, J. W. Jenkins, Michael Kinney, William Martin, P. G. Johnson, J. H. Overstreet, W. D. Thompson, R. A. Williamson, R. H. Wilkes. Co. D. Sergeant George W. Morecock, Chambers Driskill, Corporal P. H. Harlow, Private
The Daily Dispatch: November 29, 1860., [Electronic resource], An opinion from Missouri. (search)
hing new has been added by the writers who have since taken up the subject, and their name is legion. We have read them all, we believe, of any note, and by none of them has even hinted that Woodfall suspected Sir Philip Francis, or that any body else did until the appearance of Taylor's book. Good, writing under the eye of Woodfall's own son, an essay for his own edition, enumerates upwards of thirty candidates, but does not once mention Sir Philip, or so much as allude to him. A man named Wade published an edition of the letters about ten years ago. He takes it for granted that Francis was the author, but produces no new argument. Francis, when seventy-four years old, married a young woman of two and twenty. To this lady, still living, Lord Campbell wrote a letter requesting her to give all the information in her power. Her answer is a curiosity in its way. It is evident that she herself was convinced, and that Francis was extremely desirous to be thought the author; but she ca
The Daily Dispatch: December 18, 1860., [Electronic resource], Remarkable Rascality in Chicago. (search)
ver. The bill granting the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company the right of way ever the Potomac Bridge, was made the order of the day for Wednesday next, and the Mexican treaty also. The treaty stipulation with Spain was debated. Mr. Wade, of Ohio, made a speech on the reference of a portion of the President's Message to the Special Committee of Thirty-three. He said South Carolina could not complain of the acts of the Republicans, because their party had never had the power; alve law contained no previsions in restraint of Individual liberty which was not also contained in all the laws providing for the rendition of fugitives from justice. The Republicans cared for nothing, if the negro was not in it. [Applause] Mr. Wade resumed, and said that the South had the Supreme Court, Cabinst, and owned, the President completely as ever a slave was owned. The South only complains because the North would leave the old road to follow the new. He continued at great length
The Daily Dispatch: February 11, 1861., [Electronic resource], article 1 (search)
agree on any plan of compromise, the Maryland delegation will press on the Conference the proportion for calling a National Convention, thus transferring the whole question direct to the people. The meetings have thus far been very harmonious, and there is an evident desire not to disagree. The election in Tennessee to-day, for candidates to a Convention, will, should she follow the lead of Virginia, have a favorable effect on the deliberations of the Conference. Senators Collamer, Wade, and other Republican leaders, say that they will vote to submit the proposition of the Conference to a direct vote of the people. From all we can learn, our previously expressed opinion that the Convention will recommend a settlement by a large majority vote from both sections — the South and the North--remains unchanged. We know that members of the body from the North, who came here indisposed to make any concessions whatever, as well as members from the South who came here disposed to