hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
George Bancroft, History of the United States from the Discovery of the American Continent, Vol. 6, 10th edition. 30 0 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Your search returned 30 results in 5 document sections:

necessary support, and to consolidate their authority by the presence of a small standing army. The opinions of Hutchinson were of peculiar importance, for while he assented to Bernard's views, and was forming relations with Israel Mauduit and Whately, and through them with Jenkinson, Grenville and Wedderburn, his plausible letters to Richard Jackson had so imposed upon the more liberal statesmen of England, that they looked forward with hope to his appointment as Bernard's successor. We an merchant. Townshend opened the debate De Guerchy to Choiseul, 14 May, 1767. I have very full reports from Garth, Agent for South Carolina, and member of the House of Commons, who was present, and from W. S. Johnson, who got reports from Whately and from Richard Jackson, and from Trecothick. Compare Walpole's Memoirs, III. 28; Cavendish Debates, i. 38, 39, 213; Franklin's Writings, VII. 333. with professions of candor and the air of a man of business. Exculpating alike Pennsylvania an
uld not form one of any kind. He did not omit to add some reproaches about the past; but the King was in the best humor. He bowed very graciously, and Rockingham bowed, and so they parted. What did the King say to you? asked Grafton and Conway eagerly, as Rockingham came out; and the only answer he could make was— Nothing. Once more Rockingham was urged to join with the friends of Chatham; Compare Durand to Choiseul, 3 August, 1767. but he was unaccommodating and impracticable. Whately to Temple, 30 July, 1767; in Lyttelton, 729. He has managed it ill, thought Hardwicke. Life of Lord Chancellor Hardwicke, III. 459. Richmond and others were anxious and uneasy. E. Burke to Rockingham, 18 August, 1767. A leader of a party had never Aug. done so much to diminish its influence. Very honest, truly liberal, of a merciful and generous nature, his intellect bore no comparison to his virtues, his conduct no analogy to his good intentions. Deceived by his reverence for the
ify their words and change their purposes. Bernard to Hillsborough, 16-18 June, 1768. Hutchinson sounded the alarm to his various correspondents, especially to Whately, Compare Whately to Grenville, 26 July, 1768; in Grenville Papers, IV. 322. I now know, &c. &c. to whom Paxton also sent word, that unless they should have immWhately to Grenville, 26 July, 1768; in Grenville Papers, IV. 322. I now know, &c. &c. to whom Paxton also sent word, that unless they should have immediately two or three regiments, it was the opinion of all the friends to government, that Boston would be in open rebellion. Charles Paxton to T. Whately, in the Letters, &c. 41. To interpret and enforce the correspondence, Hallowell, the comptroller, was despatched as their emissary to London. Bernard to Hillsborough, P. S. 18 June, 1768. Hutchinson to Whately, 18 June, 1768. To bring troops into Boston, was the surest way of hastening an insurrection; the letters, soliciting them, may have been kept secret, but the town divined their purpose; and at its legal meeting on Chap. XXXIV.} 1768. June. Friday, the seventeenth, instructing its repre
0 Jan. 1769. whose authority he wished it made treasonable to deny,—written for public purposes, Of a previous Letter Whately writes, I have not been wanting to signify through proper channels, &c. &c. Whately to Hutchinson, London, 11 Feb. 1769.Whately to Hutchinson, London, 11 Feb. 1769. and communicated to Grenville Compare for example, Whately to Grenville, 3 Dec. 1769. Another Correspondent, the same gentleman, one of whose letters I lately sent you, &c. &c. The gentleman was Hutchinson. This confirms Almon's statement. himsWhately to Grenville, 3 Dec. 1769. Another Correspondent, the same gentleman, one of whose letters I lately sent you, &c. &c. The gentleman was Hutchinson. This confirms Almon's statement. himself, to Temple, Almon's Biographical anecdotes of Eminent Men; II. 105. Biog. Of Thomas Whately. Mr. Whately showed them to Mr. Grenville, who showed them to Lord Temple, and they were seen by other gentlemen. This refers to the very letter ofle of Representative Government in England; where the love of order began to find apologists for absolute Government. Whately to Grenville, 25 March, 1769; in Grenville Papers, IV. 417. While England was enforcing its restrictive corn- Chap.
reated the concealment of his solicitations. Keep secret every thing I write, Hutchinson to Whately, 20 or 26 Oct. 1769. said he to Whately, his channel for communicating with Grenville. I have Whately, his channel for communicating with Grenville. I have never yet seen any rational plan for a partial subjection; he writes to Jenkinson's influential friend Mauduit; my sentiments upon these points should be concealed. Hutchinson to I. Mauduit, 27 Ocd legal; persons in the highest stations declared against the Revenue Acts; Andrew Oliver to Whately, New-York, 12 August, 1769. 1770. and the Governor wished their repeal. Same to Hutchinson N, 19 Oct. 1769. Chap. XLII.} 1769. Oct. within the first week of its session, Hutchinson to Whately, 20 Oct. 1769; and see Whately to Grenville, 3 Dec. 1769; in Grenville Papers, IV. 486. would cWhately to Grenville, 3 Dec. 1769; in Grenville Papers, IV. 486. would change the municipal government of Boston, Hutchinson to John Pownall Secretary of the Board of Trade, at which Hillsborough presided, 23 Oct. 1769. incapacitate its patriots to hold any public off