hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
The Daily Dispatch: February 22, 1862., [Electronic resource] 6 0 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: February 22, 1862., [Electronic resource]. You can also browse the collection for N. L. Wilson or search for N. L. Wilson in all documents.

Your search returned 3 results in 2 document sections:

The Daily Dispatch: February 22, 1862., [Electronic resource], Conference of Railroad officers invited at the War Department. (search)
Conference of Railroad officers invited at the War Department. --The War Department at Washington has just learned the following. War Department, Feb. 18, 1862, The railroad operations of the War Department require that there should be a just and officiant system of railroad transport, that would secure to the Government energetic action, with a fair of charges--. The Secretary of Va. believing that be may safely appeal to the douglas experiences of the officers of the railroad companies, and to their patriots feelings for aid in sovereignty such a system to the States to meet subject, at Washington 20th day of February, 1862. Non. Corning and N. L. Wilson, now in this city, are requested to set as a committee of arrangements. [Signed,] Edwin M. Starton, Secretary of War.
The Daily Dispatch: February 22, 1862., [Electronic resource], House of Delegates. (search)
from their home in this who may be sojourning in said cities and counties.--Rep.] An amendment to the second section was proposed by Mr. Prince, and adopted; when, upon motion of Mr. Banour, the House took up The tax bill. Mr. Wilson proposed to amend the thirty-second section of article first, imposing a specific tax of upon distillers, by excepting from-its operation distilleries engaged wholly and for not more than four months in the distillation of trait. Mr. WilsMr. Wilson warmly supported his amendment, declaring the proposed tax to be unjust in its operation upon the fruit growing sections of the State, and contending that the effect of its imposition would be to diminish instead of increase the public revenue. Mr. Paton took substantially the same ground, maintaining that the tax would be, in certain cases, prohibitory in its effect, and would be exceedingly oppressive to the small farmers in his section, who frequently rely upon this distillation of fr