hide
Named Entity Searches
hide
Sorting
You can sort these results in two ways:
- By entity
- Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
- By position (current method)
- As the entities appear in the document.
You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.
hide
Most Frequent Entities
The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.
Entity | Max. Freq | Min. Freq | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Plato (Colombia) | 66 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Meno (Oklahoma, United States) | 56 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Iliad (Montana, United States) | 40 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Meno (New York, United States) | 38 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Phil (Kentucky, United States) | 34 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Lucian (Arkansas, United States) | 22 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Phil (North Carolina, United States) | 22 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Ruskin (Canada) | 18 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Phil (Nevada, United States) | 18 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Athens (Greece) | 16 | 0 | Browse | Search |
View all entities in this document... |
Browsing named entities in a specific section of Plato, Republic. Search the whole document.
Found 9 total hits in 3 results.
Cleopatra (Missouri, United States) (search for this): book 3, section 393d
And lest you may say again that you
don't understand, I will explain to you how this would be done. If Homer,
after telling us that Chryses came with the ransom of his daughter and as a
suppliant of the Achaeans but chiefly of the kings, had gone on speaking not
as if made or being ChrysesCf. Hazlitt,
Antony and Cleopatra: “Shakespeare does not stand reasoning on what his
characters would do or say, but at once becomes them and speaks and acts
for them.” but still as Homer, you are aware that it
would not be imitation but narration, pure and simple. It would have been
somewhat in this wise. I will state it without meter for I am not a
poet:From here to 394 B, Plato gives a
prose paraphrase of
Shakespeare (Canada) (search for this): book 3, section 393d
And lest you may say again that you
don't understand, I will explain to you how this would be done. If Homer,
after telling us that Chryses came with the ransom of his daughter and as a
suppliant of the Achaeans but chiefly of the kings, had gone on speaking not
as if made or being ChrysesCf. Hazlitt,
Antony and Cleopatra: “Shakespeare does not stand reasoning on what his
characters would do or say, but at once becomes them and speaks and acts
for them.” but still as Homer, you are aware that it
would not be imitation but narration, pure and simple. It would have been
somewhat in this wise. I will state it without meter for I am not a
poet:From here to 394 B, Plato gives a
prose paraphrase of
Iliad (Montana, United States) (search for this): book 3, section 393d