hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
191 BC 4 4 Browse Search
194 BC 3 3 Browse Search
197 BC 3 3 Browse Search
191 BC 3 3 Browse Search
195 BC 3 3 Browse Search
207 BC 2 2 Browse Search
196 BC 2 2 Browse Search
188 BC 2 2 Browse Search
205 BC 2 2 Browse Search
281 BC 1 1 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of Titus Livius (Livy), The History of Rome, Book 36 (ed. Evan T. Sage, PhD professor of latin and head of the department of classics in the University of Pittsburgh). Search the whole document.

Found 1 total hit in 1 results.

, through conferences with their chiefs, tried to induce the townspeople to surrender the city, not doubting that if Heraclea were captured first they would submit to the Romans in preference to him and that the consul would take the credit to himself in raising the siege. Nor was he deceived in this opinion; for immediately after the taking of Heraclea the message came that he should abandon the siege: it was fairer that the Roman soldiers, who had fought in the battle-line with the Aetolians, should enjoy the rewards of victory.Philip showed no signs of resentment at this treatment until 185 B.C. (XXXIX. xxiii. 9), when it was one of his grievances. So he retired from Lamia and, after the misfortune of a neighbouring city, the people escaped suffering a similar fate.The natural inference from the consul's message would be that the Roman army would at once take up the siege, but this was not done and Lamia was not taken until the next year (XXXVII. v. 3).