hide
Named Entity Searches
hide
Matching Documents
The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.
Browsing named entities in Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 11. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones). You can also browse the collection for Abner Doubleday or search for Abner Doubleday in all documents.
Your search returned 16 results in 5 document sections:
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 11. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones), General Beauregard 's report of the battle of Drury's Bluff . (search)
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 11. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones), Notes and Queries. (search)
Notes and Queries.
Our refutation of General Doubleday's slander of General Armistead has elicited hearty thanks from many quarters.
Among others a gallant soldier and distinguished citizen (once governor) of another State, who was Armistead's comrade in the Mexican War, writes: Your complete vindication of General Armistead in your August and September issue, furnishes a valuable leaf in the history of the war between the States, and relieves from calumny the memory of as gallant a soldier, and as true a patriot, as ever drew sword in a just cause.
General Fitzhugh Lee invited to lecture in New England.
The following letter from Dr. Hamlin (a nephew of ex-Vice President Hamlin) explains itself.
Its frank, manly spirit, and the feelings which dictated it, will be appreciated and reciprocated by our Confederate soldiers and people:
Bangor, Maine, December 8, 1882.
General,—I am instructed by the Grand Army Post, No. 12, of this city, which numbers among its members
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 11. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones), The Shenandoah Valley in 1864 , by George E. Pond —Campaigns of the civil war, XI . (search)
The Shenandoah Valley in 1864, by George E. Pond—Campaigns of the civil war, XI. A Review, by Colonel Wm. Allan.
This is one of the most interesting of the Scribner series and is valuable because of the clearness with which it is written, and of the amount of research it shows in bringing together information from widely scattered sources, concerning an exciting and important campaign.
As history, too, it is far better than General Doubleday's Gettysburg, though it is far behind the best numbers of the series.
Mr. Rope's Army under Pope, and General Palfrey's Antietam, for instance.
It is mainly a narrative of the Federal operations in the Valley in 1864, only describing and discussing the Confederate side, so far as is necessary to the comprehension of the achievements of the Union armies.
While, too, Mr. Pond's language is temperate, and he aims at fairness, his bias is very evident, and often converts his pages into a defence of, or panegyric upon the Federal commanders.
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 11. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones), Notes and Queries. (search)
Notes and Queries.
General Doubleday's Slander of General Armistead once more.
Our readers remember how effectually we disposed of General Doubleday's slander of General L. A. Armistead, to hat he had wronged his country.
We sent General Doubleday these proofs that he had wronged a gall ht in that respect.
Yours, very truly, Abner Doubleday.
From this letter it will appear that e ought, perhaps, to be duly grateful to General Doubleday for making even this small concession, e me of the other marvellous statements in General Doubleday's book, we know exactly how to account f he utter falsity of the slander to which General Doubleday still adheres, we give the following sta Moore had never read the discussions of General Doubleday's statements about General Armistead at ead's making use of any such language as General Doubleday attributes to him. I have given you the nd all cavil, the reckless slander which General Doubleday based on camp rumor, and to which he cli
[1 more...]
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 11. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones), Literary notices. (search)