hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
South Carolina (South Carolina, United States) 36 0 Browse Search
Lincoln 19 1 Browse Search
Drumwright 16 0 Browse Search
Georgia (Georgia, United States) 16 0 Browse Search
United States (United States) 16 0 Browse Search
Garibaldi 14 0 Browse Search
Joseph Bell 14 0 Browse Search
November 30th 14 14 Browse Search
Baltimore, Md. (Maryland, United States) 12 0 Browse Search
Charles M. Bosher 10 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: December 1, 1860., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 17 total hits in 6 results.

Poland (Poland) (search for this): article 7
ill be brought, against their will, under a government to which they are not parties, and over which they hold not the slightest check? This is not the form of government which our ancestors gave us, nor is it a government which our people will endure. The people of the North, in thus acting, have separated themselves from the people of the South, and the government they thus inaugurate will be to us the government of a foreign power. We shall stand to such powers as Italy to Austria, and Poland to Russia. It will be one people governed by another people. Who can wonder, then, at the startling events which have crowded before us since the anti-Federal act of this Northern election? What was seen yesterday but in dim distance, is the reality of to-day; and that which is looked to but as a probability to-day, becomes the stern fact of to-morrow. Our people at the South are intelligent, brave and sensitive. When a hostile arm is raised against them they do not wait for the ble
Austria (Austria) (search for this): article 7
inion they will be brought, against their will, under a government to which they are not parties, and over which they hold not the slightest check? This is not the form of government which our ancestors gave us, nor is it a government which our people will endure. The people of the North, in thus acting, have separated themselves from the people of the South, and the government they thus inaugurate will be to us the government of a foreign power. We shall stand to such powers as Italy to Austria, and Poland to Russia. It will be one people governed by another people. Who can wonder, then, at the startling events which have crowded before us since the anti-Federal act of this Northern election? What was seen yesterday but in dim distance, is the reality of to-day; and that which is looked to but as a probability to-day, becomes the stern fact of to-morrow. Our people at the South are intelligent, brave and sensitive. When a hostile arm is raised against them they do not wai
Russia (Russia) (search for this): article 7
ught, against their will, under a government to which they are not parties, and over which they hold not the slightest check? This is not the form of government which our ancestors gave us, nor is it a government which our people will endure. The people of the North, in thus acting, have separated themselves from the people of the South, and the government they thus inaugurate will be to us the government of a foreign power. We shall stand to such powers as Italy to Austria, and Poland to Russia. It will be one people governed by another people. Who can wonder, then, at the startling events which have crowded before us since the anti-Federal act of this Northern election? What was seen yesterday but in dim distance, is the reality of to-day; and that which is looked to but as a probability to-day, becomes the stern fact of to-morrow. Our people at the South are intelligent, brave and sensitive. When a hostile arm is raised against them they do not wait for the blew, but rus
South Carolina (South Carolina, United States) (search for this): article 7
peak; which certainly have convinced me, that the Southern people must now look to their own State authorities, and to them only, for their safety in the future; whether in the form of other and higher securities in the present Confederacy, or in a new Confederacy, the injured States must determine in Convention. Indeed, in the progress of events, so far, the field of deliberation may be narrowed. One State has already made her election to abandon the confederation. I think, as to South Carolina, we may safely assume that as a fact, and with which the future has nothing more to do than to establish it in history. As to three other States, and most probably four, there is every reason to believe they are prepared also to secede as soon as the acts of separation can be reduced to form. What may be the sense of other States in this great crisis, (for great it certainly is,) as to the proper measures to be adopted for their safety. I will not venture to anticipate. But the seces
J. M. Mason (search for this): article 7
The proposed State Convention. The following letter from Senator Mason, giving his views on the condition of the country, and more especially in regard to the expediency of the call of a Convention of the people of Virginia, to consider what it may become the State to do in the crisis which is upon us, will command general attention.--It is in response to a letter addressed to him by one of the editors of the Richmond Enquirer. Senator Mason says that whilst he is disinclined at all times to volunteer his opinions, he has not the slightest indisposition to express them when they are asked.--He proceeds: I have observed, with great satisfaction,e purpose to establish the just rights of our people, and to yield nothing that pertains to Virginia as a free and sovereign State. Very respectfully, yours, J. M. Mason. The Enquirer also publishes a letter from the Hon. Henry L. Hopkins, a prominent member of the Douglas wing of the Virginia Democracy, in response t
Henry L. Hopkins (search for this): article 7
an obdurate purpose to establish the just rights of our people, and to yield nothing that pertains to Virginia as a free and sovereign State. Very respectfully, yours, J. M. Mason. The Enquirer also publishes a letter from the Hon. Henry L. Hopkins, a prominent member of the Douglas wing of the Virginia Democracy, in response to a communication addressed to him on the subject of a State Convention. Mr. Hopkins is opposed to any Convention of delegates appointed by primary meetingsMr. Hopkins is opposed to any Convention of delegates appointed by primary meetings of the people; but thinks it would be wise for the Legislature to call such a Convention, and provide by law for the election of its members, without delay. Alluding to the secession movement, he says: While the cotton States are busily preparing to take the awful step of secession, merely because of the loss of a Presidential election, under and according to the forms of the Constitution. I would appeal to them, as friends and brethren, to wait yet a little longer — especially as both