hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
Wise 33 17 Browse Search
United States (United States) 28 0 Browse Search
Marmaduke Johnson 26 0 Browse Search
France (France) 26 0 Browse Search
John Brown 22 0 Browse Search
Harvie 22 6 Browse Search
Montague 20 2 Browse Search
Flournoy 20 6 Browse Search
Morton 19 5 Browse Search
Goggin 19 5 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: April 5, 1861., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 441 total hits in 160 results.

1 2 3 4 5 6 ...
Maryland (Maryland, United States) (search for this): article 1
quier, that if this Union could not be safely reconstructed, the destiny of Virginia was with the South; and he hoped that it would find a response in the mind of every member on this floor. The point of difference between them was whether we should have a Conference before or after the withdrawal of Virginia. He alluded to the appointment of Commissioners to the proposed Conference. Appointments by this Convention, he apprehended, would not represent the popular sentiment of the State.--Maryland would be represented by Commissioners appointed by the Governor, who, if not a Black Republican, was cousin-german to that party. He had little hope that any of the Border States would be represented in such a manner as to reflect the popular interest. He maintained that Virginia should act for herself in the emergency — secede first, and trust to co-operation afterwards. He did not doubt that if Virginia went out and joined the Southern Confederacy, the others would follow. Until, howe
United States (United States) (search for this): article 1
derived from the one at the South, and alluded to the proud position that Virginia would occupy at the head of the Confederate States. She would then be strong enough to dictate terms to the North, and by no other method could she so surely aid in on passed--Mr. Wise voting "no." The fourth resolution was then read, as follows: 4. The Territories of the United States constitute a trust to be administered by the General Government, for the common benefit of the people of the United SUnited States, and any policy in respect to such Territories calculated to confer greater benefits on the people of one part of the United States than on the people of another part, is contrary to equality, and prejudicial to the rights of some for whose eqUnited States than on the people of another part, is contrary to equality, and prejudicial to the rights of some for whose equal benefit the trust was created. It the equal admission of slave labor and free labor into any Territory excites unfriendly conflict between the systems, a fair partition of the Territories ought to be made between them, and each system ought to
McAllister (Pennsylvania, United States) (search for this): article 1
paid the interest upon the sum paid for their protection. Millions upon millions of dollars had been appropriated to the East, through which the State was deeply in debt, and he claimed that the East should bear a due proportion of the tax. Mr. Stuart continued his remarks until half-past 10, when the Convention went into Committee of the Whole, For the purpose of considering the report of the Committee on Federal Relations--Mr. Southall in the chair. Mr. Richardson, of Hanover, resumed his remarks. He said that at the time of the adjournment last evening he was endeavoring to show that the proper place for Virginia was in the Southern Confederacy, and to answer, to the best of his ability, some of the arguments of gentlemen who took a different view of the matter. He proposed to show in his few remarks this morning the ruinous consequences to all the best interests of Virginia from delay. On this point he discussed the respective tariff systems of the two
Orange, N. J. (New Jersey, United States) (search for this): article 1
ient, and it was idle to maintain that this system of defence would impoverish the Southern Confederacy. Mr. Richardson paid a just tribute to the men and scenes of the past. He would not consent to remain in a Confederacy where not only those great names, but the Southern people of the present day, were dishonored by the fiendish spirit of abolitionism. He would never consent to a reconstruction of the Union, except upon terms of perfect equality in every respect. Mr. Morton, of Orange, said that he had designed expressing his views in Committee of the Whole, but in the very limited time that remained for discussion he would have to confine himself to a brief glance at the questions at issue. He argued that the proposed division by the line of 3630 was not the equality of the Constitution; not the equality proclaimed by the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott decision. Such a compromise he deemed a sacrifice of Southern rights, if not of Southern honor. He would never conse
Fauquier (Virginia, United States) (search for this): article 1
Southern honor. He would never consent to a reconstruction of the Union except on terms of perfect equality — equality from the foundation to the very capstone of the Government. He proceeded upon the position assumed by the gentleman from Fauquier, (Mr. Scott,) on yesterday, that the South would not be safe under any concessions of constitutional amendment coming from the North. A guarantee of political power was the only mode through which the South could protect herself, and the destiny of the Union, which the fathers contemplated, be worked out. The principle, he believed, should be applied to every department of the Government. He responded cordially to the sentiment advanced by the gentleman from Fauquier, that if this Union could not be safely reconstructed, the destiny of Virginia was with the South; and he hoped that it would find a response in the mind of every member on this floor. The point of difference between them was whether we should have a Conference before o
Tyler (search for this): article 1
ed, Lawson, Leake, Marye, Montague, Morris, Morton, Orrick, Randolph, Richardson, Seawell, Speed, Strange, Thornton, Tredway, Robert H. Turner, Franklin P. Turner, Tyler, Wilson, Wise, Woods, and Wysor.--43. The question being again stated on the adoption of the fourth resolution. Mr. Wise moved to amend by striking out t, Parks, Preston, Randolph, Richardson, Seawell, Sheffey, Slaughter, Southall, Speed, Strange, Sutherlin, Thornton, Tredway, Robert H. Turner, Franklin, B. Turner, Tyler, Whitfield, Wilson, Wise, Woods, and Wysor.--68. Nays.--Messrs. Ashton, Alfred M. Barbour, Baytor, Berlin, Boggess, Branch, Brent, Brown, Burdett, Byrne, Campugh, Robert E. Scott, William C. Scott, Sharp, Sheffey, Sitlington, Slaughter, Southall, Speed, Spurlock, Staples, Alex. H. H. Stuart, Chapman J. Stuart, Summers, Sutherlin, Tarr, Tayloe, Tredway, F. B. Turner, Tyler, Waller, Whitfield, Wickham, Willey, and Wilson.--91. The Committee then took a recess until 4 o'clock P. M.
Carlile (search for this): article 1
stand as the judgment of the House?" Mr. Wise explained the motive which actuated him in making the appeal. Mr. Carlile rose to a question of order.--He desired to know if there was no limit to the discussion of an appeal. The Chairm, A. M. Barbour, Baylor, Berlin, Blow, Boggess, Bouldin, Boyd, Branch, Brent, Brown, Burdett, Byrne, Campbell, Caperton, Carlile, Carter, Chapman, C. B. Conrad, R. Y. Conrad, Couch, James H. Cox, Critcher, Curtis, Dent, Deskins, Dorman, Early, Echol Nays.--Messrs. Ashton, Alfred M. Barbour, Baytor, Berlin, Boggess, Branch, Brent, Brown, Burdett, Byrne, Campbell, Carlile, Carter, Robert Y. Conrad, Couch, James H. Cox, Critcher, Curtis, Dent, Early, French, Fugate, Gravely, Gray, Goggin, Adand the amendment was rejected by the following vote: Yeas.--Messrs. Ambler, Jas. Barbour, Blakey, Boisseau, Borst, Carlile, Cecil, Chapman, Coffman, Conn, Jas. H. Cox, Richard H. Cox, Fisher, Garland, Graham, John Goode, Jr., Hale, Cyrus Hall,
Anthony Burns (search for this): article 1
had a right to complain of the hostile action of the General Government, notwithstanding the claim set up that Virginia had always sanctioned or ratified the measures of the Administration in respect to slavery. The report of the Harper's Ferry Committee showed that the North had for years been engaged in running off the property of the South, and citizens had been murdered in the attempt to execute the fugitive slave law. A few years ago, under Fillmore's Administration, a negro named Anthony Burns was brought back, but it required not only the whole military force of a State, but a large force of the General Government, involving an expense of some hundred thousand dollars to bring back a slave worth seven or eight hundred. Such was an illustration of public sentiment at the North. Should Virginia remain under such a Government as that? He went on to argue that the free-soil had been trespassing upon the slave property of the border, almost depleting the counties there, and thi
Orrick (search for this): article 1
sher, Graham, John Goode, Jr., Cyrus Hall, Lewis S. Hall, Harvie, Holcombe, Hughes, Hunton, Isbell, Kent, Kindred, Lawson, Leake, Marye, Montague, Morris, Morton, Orrick, Randolph, Richardson, Seawell, Speed, Strange, Thornton, Tredway, Robert H. Turner, Franklin P. Turner, Tyler, Wilson, Wise, Woods, and Wysor.--43. The quesl, Hammond, Harvie, Holcombe, Hunton, Isbell, Kent, Kilby, Kindred, Lawson, Leake, Macfarland, Charles K. Mallory, Marr, Marye, Montague, Morris, Morton, Neblett, Orrick, Parks, Preston, Randolph, Richardson, Seawell, Sheffey, Slaughter, Southall, Speed, Strange, Sutherlin, Thornton, Tredway, Robert H. Turner, Franklin, B. Turner,. C. Johnston, Kilby, Lewis, McComas, McGrew, McNeil, Macfarland, Charles K. Mallory, James B Mallory, Marshall, Marr, Marye, Sr, Masters, Moffett, Moore, Nelson, Orrick, Osburn, Parks, Patrick, Pendleton, Porter, Preston, Price, Pugh, Robert E. Scott, William C. Scott, Sharp, Sheffey, Sitlington, Slaughter, Southall, Speed, Spurl
Morton (search for this): article 1
ion, except upon terms of perfect equality in every respect. Mr. Morton, of Orange, said that he had designed expressing his views in Comirginia should set up for herself, he wanted no union with them. Mr. Morton continued to urge the necessity of secession until the hour of 12ton, Isbell, Kent, Kindred, Lawson, Leake, Marye, Montague, Morris, Morton, Orrick, Randolph, Richardson, Seawell, Speed, Strange, Thornton, Take, Macfarland, Charles K. Mallory, Marr, Marye, Montague, Morris, Morton, Neblett, Orrick, Parks, Preston, Randolph, Richardson, Seawell, Shnsert the word "others." The amendments were agreed to. Mr. Morton moved to further amend the fourth resolution, by striking out allhe word "created," commencing "If the equal admission, " &c. Mr. Morton having explained his amendment, and Mr. Montague having said a fe, Holcombe, Hunton, Isbell, Kent, Kindred, Leake, Montague, Morris, Morton, Neblett, Randolph, Richardson, Seawell, Strange, Thornton, Robert
1 2 3 4 5 6 ...