hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
United States (United States) 54 0 Browse Search
Harper's Ferry (West Virginia, United States) 34 0 Browse Search
Hampton (Virginia, United States) 24 0 Browse Search
C. M. Clay 22 0 Browse Search
Maryland (Maryland, United States) 20 0 Browse Search
Lincoln 20 6 Browse Search
W. Williams 18 0 Browse Search
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) 16 0 Browse Search
John S. Carlile 14 0 Browse Search
Aquia Creek (Virginia, United States) 12 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: June 13, 1861., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 21 total hits in 13 results.

1 2
Arkansas (Arkansas, United States) (search for this): article 10
ndorsing the anti war policy of Mr. Douglas, Mr. Vallandiagham closes his letter as follows: These were the sentiments of the Democratic party, of the Constitutional Union party, and of a large majority of the Republican presses and party, only six weeks ago. They were mine — I voted them repeatedly, along with every Democrat and Union man in the House. I have seen nothing to change, much to confirm them since, especially in the secession, within the last thirty days, of Virginia, Arkansas, North Carolina and Tennessee, taking with them four millions and a half of people, immense wealth, inexhanstible resources, five hundred thousand fighting men, and the graves of Washington and Jackson. I shall vote them again. Waiving the question of the doubtful legality of the first proclamation, of April 15th, calling out the militia for "three months," under the act of 1795, I will yet vote to pay them, because they had no motive but supposed duty and patriotism to move them; and
North Carolina (North Carolina, United States) (search for this): article 10
anti war policy of Mr. Douglas, Mr. Vallandiagham closes his letter as follows: These were the sentiments of the Democratic party, of the Constitutional Union party, and of a large majority of the Republican presses and party, only six weeks ago. They were mine — I voted them repeatedly, along with every Democrat and Union man in the House. I have seen nothing to change, much to confirm them since, especially in the secession, within the last thirty days, of Virginia, Arkansas, North Carolina and Tennessee, taking with them four millions and a half of people, immense wealth, inexhanstible resources, five hundred thousand fighting men, and the graves of Washington and Jackson. I shall vote them again. Waiving the question of the doubtful legality of the first proclamation, of April 15th, calling out the militia for "three months," under the act of 1795, I will yet vote to pay them, because they had no motive but supposed duty and patriotism to move them; and, moreover, t
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) (search for this): article 10
f Mr. Douglas, Mr. Vallandiagham closes his letter as follows: These were the sentiments of the Democratic party, of the Constitutional Union party, and of a large majority of the Republican presses and party, only six weeks ago. They were mine — I voted them repeatedly, along with every Democrat and Union man in the House. I have seen nothing to change, much to confirm them since, especially in the secession, within the last thirty days, of Virginia, Arkansas, North Carolina and Tennessee, taking with them four millions and a half of people, immense wealth, inexhanstible resources, five hundred thousand fighting men, and the graves of Washington and Jackson. I shall vote them again. Waiving the question of the doubtful legality of the first proclamation, of April 15th, calling out the militia for "three months," under the act of 1795, I will yet vote to pay them, because they had no motive but supposed duty and patriotism to move them; and, moreover, they will have re
Vallandiagham (search for this): article 10
Hon. C. L. Vallandingham. The following are extracts from a recent letter from the Hon. C. L. Vallandingham to a committee of gentlemen who had requested his opinion upon the present condition of the country. After giving extensive extracts from the speech of Stephen A. Douglas, in opposition to any war policy against the South, made on the 13th March, 1861, and heartily endorsing the anti war policy of Mr. Douglas, Mr. Vallandiagham closes his letter as follows: These were the sentiments of the Democratic party, of the Constitutional Union party, and of a large majority of the Republican presses and party, only six weeks ago. They were mine — I voted them repeatedly, along with every Democrat and Union man in the House. I have seen nothing to change, much to confirm them since, especially in the secession, within the last thirty days, of Virginia, Arkansas, North Carolina and Tennessee, taking with them four millions and a half of people, immense wealth, inexhanstibl
Stephen A. Douglas (search for this): article 10
. The following are extracts from a recent letter from the Hon. C. L. Vallandingham to a committee of gentlemen who had requested his opinion upon the present condition of the country. After giving extensive extracts from the speech of Stephen A. Douglas, in opposition to any war policy against the South, made on the 13th March, 1861, and heartily endorsing the anti war policy of Mr. Douglas, Mr. Vallandiagham closes his letter as follows: These were the sentiments of the DemocratiMr. Douglas, Mr. Vallandiagham closes his letter as follows: These were the sentiments of the Democratic party, of the Constitutional Union party, and of a large majority of the Republican presses and party, only six weeks ago. They were mine — I voted them repeatedly, along with every Democrat and Union man in the House. I have seen nothing to change, much to confirm them since, especially in the secession, within the last thirty days, of Virginia, Arkansas, North Carolina and Tennessee, taking with them four millions and a half of people, immense wealth, inexhanstible resources, five hundred
C. L. Valandingham (search for this): article 10
f the war, one thing, at least, every lover of liberty ought to demand inexorably: that it shall be carried on strictly subject to the Constitution. The peace policy was tried; it arrested secession, and promised a restoration of the Union. The policy of war is now upon trial; in twenty days it has driven four States and four millions and a half of people out of the Union and into the Confederacy of the South. In a little while longer it will drive out, also, two or four more States, and two or three millions of people. War may, indeed, be the policy of the East; but peace is a necessity to the West. I would have volunteered nothing, gentlemen, at this time in regard to this civil war; but as constituents, you have a right to know my opinions and position; and briefly, but most frankly, you have them. My only answer to those who indulge in slander and vituperation, was given in a card of the 17th of April, here with enclosed. Very truly, C. L. Valandingham.
Jackson (search for this): article 10
majority of the Republican presses and party, only six weeks ago. They were mine — I voted them repeatedly, along with every Democrat and Union man in the House. I have seen nothing to change, much to confirm them since, especially in the secession, within the last thirty days, of Virginia, Arkansas, North Carolina and Tennessee, taking with them four millions and a half of people, immense wealth, inexhanstible resources, five hundred thousand fighting men, and the graves of Washington and Jackson. I shall vote them again. Waiving the question of the doubtful legality of the first proclamation, of April 15th, calling out the militia for "three months," under the act of 1795, I will yet vote to pay them, because they had no motive but supposed duty and patriotism to move them; and, moreover, they will have rendered almost the entire service required of them, before Congress shall meet. But the audacious usurpation of President Lincoln, for which he deserves impeachment, in dari
Lincoln (search for this): article 10
d fighting men, and the graves of Washington and Jackson. I shall vote them again. Waiving the question of the doubtful legality of the first proclamation, of April 15th, calling out the militia for "three months," under the act of 1795, I will yet vote to pay them, because they had no motive but supposed duty and patriotism to move them; and, moreover, they will have rendered almost the entire service required of them, before Congress shall meet. But the audacious usurpation of President Lincoln, for which he deserves impeachment, in daring, against the very letter of the Constitution, and without the shadow of law, to "raise and support armies," and to "provide and maintain a navy," for three or five years, by mere Executive proclamation, I will not vote to sustain or ratify — never. Millions for defence — not a man or a dollar for aggressive and offensive war. The war has had many motives for its commencement; it can have but one result, whether it lasts one year or f
C. L. Vallandingham (search for this): article 10
Hon. C. L. Vallandingham. The following are extracts from a recent letter from the Hon. C. L. Vallandingham to a committee of gentlemen who had requested his opinion upon the present condition of the country. After giving extensive extracts from the speech of Stephen A. Douglas, in opposition to any war policy against the South, made on the 13th March, 1861, and heartily endorsing the anti war policy of Mr. Douglas, Mr. Vallandiagham closes his letter as follows: These were the sthe Hon. C. L. Vallandingham to a committee of gentlemen who had requested his opinion upon the present condition of the country. After giving extensive extracts from the speech of Stephen A. Douglas, in opposition to any war policy against the South, made on the 13th March, 1861, and heartily endorsing the anti war policy of Mr. Douglas, Mr. Vallandiagham closes his letter as follows: These were the sentiments of the Democratic party, of the Constitutional Union party, and of a large majority of the Republican presses and party, only six weeks ago. They were mine — I voted them repeatedly, along with every Democrat and Union man in the House. I have seen nothing to change, much to confirm them since, especially in the secession, within the last thirty days, of Virginia, Arkansas, North Carolina and Tennessee, taking with them four millions and a half of people, immense wealth, inexhanstible
April 17th (search for this): article 10
of the war, one thing, at least, every lover of liberty ought to demand inexorably: that it shall be carried on strictly subject to the Constitution. The peace policy was tried; it arrested secession, and promised a restoration of the Union. The policy of war is now upon trial; in twenty days it has driven four States and four millions and a half of people out of the Union and into the Confederacy of the South. In a little while longer it will drive out, also, two or four more States, and two or three millions of people. War may, indeed, be the policy of the East; but peace is a necessity to the West. I would have volunteered nothing, gentlemen, at this time in regard to this civil war; but as constituents, you have a right to know my opinions and position; and briefly, but most frankly, you have them. My only answer to those who indulge in slander and vituperation, was given in a card of the 17th of April, here with enclosed. Very truly, C. L. Valandingham.
1 2