hide
Named Entity Searches
hide
Sorting
You can sort these results in two ways:
- By entity
- Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
- By position (current method)
- As the entities appear in the document.
You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.
hide
Most Frequent Entities
The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.
Entity | Max. Freq | Min. Freq | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
United States (United States) | 26 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Frederick Ward | 21 | 1 | Browse | Search |
Charles D. Hinks | 20 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Old Point (North Carolina, United States) | 20 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Mathias Point (Virginia, United States) | 18 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Fortress Monroe (Virginia, United States) | 18 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Abe Lincoln | 18 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Maryland (Maryland, United States) | 16 | 0 | Browse | Search |
James K. Lee | 15 | 1 | Browse | Search |
Abraham Lincoln | 15 | 1 | Browse | Search |
View all entities in this document... |
Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: July 4, 1861., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.
Found 1 total hit in 1 results.
2nd (search for this): article 17
An Anisona jury.
--The Mesilla Times gives the subjoined report of the verdict of a most potential jury in that quarter:
This case, the Padre of Las Cruces vs. The People of the Territory of New Mexico, came on to be heard before the Alcaide of Dona Ana, on the 2d inst. A jury of six was empaneled, and the evidence placed before the jury, and they retired to agree on their verdict.
Two were for fining the Padre for his eccentric conduct, the others were for allowing them to go clear.
The majority finally brought in an extraordinary verdict, fining the two dissenting jurors $5 each, fining a person who had nothing whatever to do with the case $25, and acquitting the Padre.