hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
United States (United States) 62 0 Browse Search
Abraham Lincoln 43 1 Browse Search
Jefferson Davis 23 1 Browse Search
North Carolina (North Carolina, United States) 18 0 Browse Search
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) 16 0 Browse Search
Bull Creek (Missouri, United States) 16 0 Browse Search
Beauregard 16 8 Browse Search
Scott 15 13 Browse Search
Georgia (Georgia, United States) 14 0 Browse Search
South Carolina (South Carolina, United States) 12 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: July 22, 1861.., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 4 total hits in 2 results.

Venice (Ohio, United States) (search for this): article 4
A base and wilful Liar. --The Dayton (Ohio) Journal, under the head of "Increase the army," declared that: "By an act of Congress and proclamation of the President, eleven new regiments, one of artillery, one of cavalry, nine of infantry of 2,300 men each, have been added to the United States army." Never was a more false statement put forth than by the declaration that "by an act of Congress" the regular army has been increased, and the editor of the Journal knew it to be a lie when he penned it. The increase of the army is one of the President's usurpations — a deliberate and wilful violation of his oath to support the Constitution; Congress has passed no such act — in fact, has not been in session since the inauguration of Abraham Lincoln. The increase was made in direct violation of the laws of Congress. This act alone should and would, in other times, cost the President his official head. What can be thought of a paper that will deliberately attempt to pawn u
Abraham Lincoln (search for this): article 4
d of "Increase the army," declared that: "By an act of Congress and proclamation of the President, eleven new regiments, one of artillery, one of cavalry, nine of infantry of 2,300 men each, have been added to the United States army." Never was a more false statement put forth than by the declaration that "by an act of Congress" the regular army has been increased, and the editor of the Journal knew it to be a lie when he penned it. The increase of the army is one of the President's usurpations — a deliberate and wilful violation of his oath to support the Constitution; Congress has passed no such act — in fact, has not been in session since the inauguration of Abraham Lincoln. The increase was made in direct violation of the laws of Congress. This act alone should and would, in other times, cost the President his official head. What can be thought of a paper that will deliberately attempt to pawn upon the public such an unmitigated falsehood as truth.--Dayton Empir