hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
United States (United States) 74 0 Browse Search
Missouri (Missouri, United States) 34 0 Browse Search
Wingfield Scott 34 0 Browse Search
France (France) 32 0 Browse Search
Maryland (Maryland, United States) 24 0 Browse Search
Abraham Lincoln 23 1 Browse Search
Fortress Monroe (Virginia, United States) 18 0 Browse Search
August 15th 17 17 Browse Search
Aquia Creek (Virginia, United States) 16 0 Browse Search
McClellan 15 9 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: August 19, 1861., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 28 total hits in 8 results.

Atlanta (Georgia, United States) (search for this): article 3
o the sales of $191,806,555, as officially reported by the United States Secretary of Treasury. Mr. King is a citizen of a cotton State, and yet states the total exports of the South at forty-odd millions less than her actual export of the single staple. The amount of Southern exports is, as to the greater portion of it, a matter of ascertained fact, beyond conjecture, and there is no excuse for ignorance on the subject. We published a month or two ago, on our fourth page, from the Atlanta (Ga.) Banner, a statement in detail of the exports of the United States for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1866 The statement was prepared for that west by a distinguished citizen of that town, the Hon. Howell Cobb, late Secretary of the United States Treasury, and was compiled from the official returns on the subject, all of which are to be found in the last Annual Report of the Secretary of the Treasury of the United States. We shall repeat the statement from the Banner. The total exp
United States (United States) (search for this): article 3
n public, but it does us a positive injury for that public know that the exports of the late United States were between three and four hundred millions; and Mr. King's statement of Southern exports al year ending June 30, 1860, was to the sales of $191,806,555, as officially reported by the United States Secretary of Treasury. Mr. King is a citizen of a cotton State, and yet states the total exp our fourth page, from the Atlanta (Ga.) Banner, a statement in detail of the exports of the United States for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1866 The statement was prepared for that west by a distil of which are to be found in the last Annual Report of the Secretary of the Treasury of the United States. We shall repeat the statement from the Banner. The total exports of the "growth, product, and manufacture of the United States," exclusively of gold and foreign goods re-exported, were for the year mentioned, $316,220,610. these consisted of three classes of articles first those prod
nish, jewelry, real and imitation, other manufactures of gold and silver and gold. leaf, glass, tin, pewter and lead, marble and stone, brick, lime and cement, India-rubber shoes, India-rubber other than shoes, lard, oil, oil cake, artificial flowers, and quicksilver36,454,644 Articles not enumerated. Manufactured2,307,031 Raw produce1,356,806 Total free and slave States96,826,299 Slave States exclusively: Cotton191,806,555 Tobacco15,906.547 reand turpentine3,734,527 Rice2,507,399 Tug and pitch151,095 Brown sugar103,244 Molasses44,562 Hemp8,961 Total slave States214,322,880 Recapitulation. fine States exclusively5,671,431 Free and slave States96,826,299 Slave States exclusively214,322,880 Total$316,280,610 Thus, the amount of exports, of the kind grows exclusively by the South, was $214,102,880 This amount is to be augmented by that portion of the ninety-six millions of the first productions of the two sections which is fairly to be cre
Howell Cobb (search for this): article 3
ess than her actual export of the single staple. The amount of Southern exports is, as to the greater portion of it, a matter of ascertained fact, beyond conjecture, and there is no excuse for ignorance on the subject. We published a month or two ago, on our fourth page, from the Atlanta (Ga.) Banner, a statement in detail of the exports of the United States for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1866 The statement was prepared for that west by a distinguished citizen of that town, the Hon. Howell Cobb, late Secretary of the United States Treasury, and was compiled from the official returns on the subject, all of which are to be found in the last Annual Report of the Secretary of the Treasury of the United States. We shall repeat the statement from the Banner. The total exports of the "growth, product, and manufacture of the United States," exclusively of gold and foreign goods re-exported, were for the year mentioned, $316,220,610. these consisted of three classes of articles
T. Butler King (search for this): article 3
T. Butler King and Southern Experts. It is often meritorious to understate a fact assuring to one's advantage; but we are greatly surprised that Mr. T. Butter King, in his recent pamphlet publisKing, in his recent pamphlet published in Europe, upon the trade and resources of the South, should have put down our exports at the low figures of $150,000,000. If he had stated them at double that amount he would still have been shorow that the exports of the late United States were between three and four hundred millions; and Mr. King's statement of Southern exports at only one hundred and fifty millions, places those of the souo the sales of $191,806,555, as officially reported by the United States Secretary of Treasury. Mr. King is a citizen of a cotton State, and yet states the total exports of the South at forty-odd milled millions per annum. In view of these facts, we are quite astounded at the understatement of Mr. King, and we trust that our authorities here will instruct him to take an early opportunity to corre
this exportation was the product of the South, and was worth sixty per- cent. of the value of the exportation, or six millions and a half. This was the case with snuff and the manufactured tobacco, and with a large class of manufactured articles of other descriptions. Of the products of the forest, the South furnished full one-half.-- Of the products of agriculture, and of vegetable food, the following is to be said: It is declared by some of the most intelligent Northern writers, Mr. Kettell among the number, that the free States as a whole do not raise a surplus of provision and breadstuffs for exportation; that if the Eastern and Middle States did not procure large supplies of these articles from Virginia and other Southern States, they would consume all the surplus raised by the Western States; and that Western produce goes abroad only to the extent that it is released for that purpose by Southern produce brought in and consumed by the Eastern and Middle. States in its st
June 30th, 1866 AD (search for this): article 3
a citizen of a cotton State, and yet states the total exports of the South at forty-odd millions less than her actual export of the single staple. The amount of Southern exports is, as to the greater portion of it, a matter of ascertained fact, beyond conjecture, and there is no excuse for ignorance on the subject. We published a month or two ago, on our fourth page, from the Atlanta (Ga.) Banner, a statement in detail of the exports of the United States for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1866 The statement was prepared for that west by a distinguished citizen of that town, the Hon. Howell Cobb, late Secretary of the United States Treasury, and was compiled from the official returns on the subject, all of which are to be found in the last Annual Report of the Secretary of the Treasury of the United States. We shall repeat the statement from the Banner. The total exports of the "growth, product, and manufacture of the United States," exclusively of gold and foreign goods
June 30th, 1860 AD (search for this): article 3
ate United States were between three and four hundred millions; and Mr. King's statement of Southern exports at only one hundred and fifty millions, places those of the south below those of the North, and makes the North, Instead of the South, the great experting section of the Union. We do not know any statement that could have gone before the European mind on Southern authority which is calculated to do us more injury. The Southern export of cotton alone in the fiscal year ending June 30, 1860, was to the sales of $191,806,555, as officially reported by the United States Secretary of Treasury. Mr. King is a citizen of a cotton State, and yet states the total exports of the South at forty-odd millions less than her actual export of the single staple. The amount of Southern exports is, as to the greater portion of it, a matter of ascertained fact, beyond conjecture, and there is no excuse for ignorance on the subject. We published a month or two ago, on our fourth page, fro