hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
Harper's Encyclopedia of United States History (ed. Benson Lossing) 2,462 0 Browse Search
Knight's Mechanical Encyclopedia (ed. Knight) 692 0 Browse Search
George Bancroft, History of the United States from the Discovery of the American Continent, Vol. 10 516 0 Browse Search
George Bancroft, History of the United States from the Discovery of the American Continent, Vol. 3, 15th edition. 418 0 Browse Search
C. Julius Caesar, Gallic War 358 0 Browse Search
George Bancroft, History of the United States from the Discovery of the American Continent, Vol. 4, 15th edition. 298 0 Browse Search
Hon. J. L. M. Curry , LL.D., William Robertson Garrett , A. M. , Ph.D., Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 1.1, Legal Justification of the South in secession, The South as a factor in the territorial expansion of the United States (ed. Clement Anselm Evans) 230 0 Browse Search
H. Wager Halleck , A. M. , Lieut. of Engineers, U. S. Army ., Elements of Military Art and Science; or, Course of Instruction in Strategy, Fortification, Tactis of Battles &c., Embracing the Duties of Staff, Infantry, Cavalry, Artillery and Engineers. Adapted to the Use of Volunteers and Militia. 190 0 Browse Search
C. Edwards Lester, Life and public services of Charles Sumner: Born Jan. 6, 1811. Died March 11, 1874. 186 0 Browse Search
George Ticknor, Life, letters and journals of George Ticknor (ed. George Hillard) 182 0 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: may 5, 1862., [Electronic resource]. You can also browse the collection for France (France) or search for France (France) in all documents.

Your search returned 3 results in 3 document sections:

ournals are never tired of nothing the ridiculous word rebellion, as if we could be such a thing as rebellion of a foreign State against any other sovereign, less against a mere federal agent of the Sovereignties. But, passing by the ri inappropriateness of the term, they mainly are to be congratulated in this, that have the excitement and eclat of some rebelling against them, without any of and perils which usually appertain such a condition. When there is a rebelling in England, France, Germany, Italy, or other country that we have ever heard the superior power is generally in at least much peril as the insurgents, who take good that the game played by their masters not be, "heads I win, tails you lose."-- is the first "rebellion, " if it can be called in which the rebels set themselves up as ninepins, to be bowled down at such as the dexterity of their assailants can the feat. Or, if not a rebellion, a war as we suppose, between equally and independent nati
onment of territory must follow concentration of force, and that concentration of force is necessary to successful defence. They will see, moreover, that the more territory the enemy occupies, the weaker his forces become on the vital points, and the more extended his lines. The advantages which these divisions and prolongations offer to the invaded people, have often been pointed out, and are indeed too obvious to require farther notice. Except in the case of Paris, which is proverbially France, we know no instance in which a country has been conquered even by the occupation of its capital. The Austrians and Russians twice captured Berlin during the Seven Years War. The French occupied Vienna twice — in 1805 and 1809 --but these occupations by no means decided the war. It was the great battle of Anderliz in the first instance, and the great battle of Wagram in the second--both fought after Vienna had been taken — that put a period to the struggle. The French occupied Berlin, in 1
The Daily Dispatch: may 5, 1862., [Electronic resource], Symptoms of yellow fever in the South. (search)
t duty on cotton. They will thus be enabled to buy it on cheap terms.--They will manufacture the whole crop themselves, if possible, for their whole policy is directed to the encouragement of manufactures. They already have a tariff which virtually excludes English manufactures, but they will screw it up a page or two higher.--They will thus have the monopoly of the Southern market. They will be enabled to sell cotton Fabrice so low, that no nation can compete with them. They will drive England out of every market in the world. They will utterly break down the manufactories of England, France, Germany, Russia, Holland, Switzerland, and Spain. They will be the sole manufacturers of the world. This view never seems to have struck Lord Russell in the intensity of his hatred to the Southern States, but he may be sure it has struck his friend Seward. It is a pity such a country as England should have her foreign relations directed by such a superannuated old humbug as Russell.