hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
United States (United States) 16 0 Browse Search
Peter F. Brown 10 0 Browse Search
William H. Lyons 9 1 Browse Search
Caleb Cushing 8 0 Browse Search
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) 8 0 Browse Search
Wendell Phillips 6 0 Browse Search
Massachusetts (Massachusetts, United States) 6 0 Browse Search
Edward Everett 6 0 Browse Search
Tullahoma (Tennessee, United States) 6 0 Browse Search
J. R. Griswold 5 1 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: March 12, 1863., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 3 total hits in 3 results.

William Colenso Bishop (search for this): article 5
arge of heresy. To the surprise of many the accused were acquitted and according to the Westminster, the Court laid down the principle that "the clergy of the Established Church are not chilged to maintain every part of the Bible as an infallible record of past history, and every word as the sacred utterance of the spirit of God" In the midst of the confusion created by this decision has appeared the first volume of "The Pentateuch and Book of Joshua critically examined." by Rev. William Colenso Bishop of Natal. The author takes the ground boldly that the Pentateuch is not reliable as a historical record, and that it was not written by Moses. He places its authorship at a date considerably posterior to the events it recites. The Westminster emphatically agrees with the Bishop, and the whole is discussed, with the conclusion that the intellectual world is about to take the Bible as an expression of men's ideas of God's will, rather than an expression of the will of God himself
Religious Discussions. --A letter from Nassau, in the Charleston Courier gives some information about literary matters in England, in which is included the following: By far the most important subject is that of the alleged revolution in progress in England relative to the belief in the historical authenticity of the Bible. Over a year ago a series of powerful articles were published in book form, entitled "Essays and Reviews," in which the accuracy of the historical portions of the Old Testament were severely criticised. The strict constructionists took alarm. Numerous replies appeared, and the authors of "Essays and Reviews" were called before the Ecclesiastical Court to answer the charge of heresy. To the surprise of many the accused were acquitted and according to the Westminster, the Court laid down the principle that "the clergy of the Established Church are not chilged to maintain every part of the Bible as an infallible record of past history, and every word as
of heresy. To the surprise of many the accused were acquitted and according to the Westminster, the Court laid down the principle that "the clergy of the Established Church are not chilged to maintain every part of the Bible as an infallible record of past history, and every word as the sacred utterance of the spirit of God" In the midst of the confusion created by this decision has appeared the first volume of "The Pentateuch and Book of Joshua critically examined." by Rev. William Colenso Bishop of Natal. The author takes the ground boldly that the Pentateuch is not reliable as a historical record, and that it was not written by Moses. He places its authorship at a date considerably posterior to the events it recites. The Westminster emphatically agrees with the Bishop, and the whole is discussed, with the conclusion that the intellectual world is about to take the Bible as an expression of men's ideas of God's will, rather than an expression of the will of God himself.