hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
Salmon P. Chase 25 1 Browse Search
Lincoln 24 6 Browse Search
United States (United States) 22 0 Browse Search
France (France) 12 0 Browse Search
Dalton, Ga. (Georgia, United States) 10 0 Browse Search
J. M. Windham 8 0 Browse Search
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) 8 0 Browse Search
Walton 6 0 Browse Search
Mosby 6 0 Browse Search
February 27th 6 6 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: February 29, 1864., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 34 total hits in 16 results.

1 2
Austria (Austria) (search for this): article 4
ettered in the matter, never having given the slightest promise of assistance to Denmark. In the House of Commons Mr. Disraeli spoke in a similar strain to Earl Derby, assailing the foreign policy of the Government. Lord Palmerston replied, vigorously defending the course of Earl Russell. Mr. Gladstone explained that the promise of England to stand by Denmark was given under circumstances different from those which control the present war. Mr. Layard read dispatches from Austria and Prussia, stating that whatever arrangements might be mad relative to Schleswig and Holstein, The great Powers would be consulted. After some other speeches the address to the Queen was agreed to. In the course of his remarks Mr. Disraeli contended that the Queen's speech should have made some reference to American affairs, and complained of its silence on this and other important subjects. Lord Palmerston replied that the Government could only have repeated what has often
Slesvig (Denmark) (search for this): article 4
e distress in Ireland, and the consequent emigration of fighting men to America. Lord G. Manners expressed the hope that the Government would lose no opportunity in giving friendly advice to the American belligerents, with the view of the bloody, contest. The Schleswig Holstein war. The latest accounts state that the Danes had evacuated Schleswig and the Dannework, and fallen back on Flemburg, the Germans pursuing. A Hamburg dispatch of the morning of the 6th, says: No news from the Theatre of war had been received. It was believed that the Prussians prevent its transmission. Siwere fighting is supposed to be going on, as numbers of wounded are constantly being taken to Hendsburg. A Hamburg dispatch, of the afternoon of the 6th, gives a report that the town of Schleswig had been evacuated by the Danes and occupied by the Allies. Another dispatch says that this statement may be considered authentic. There is nothing known as to the capture of Missunde.
Russia (Russia) (search for this): article 4
ean news The British Parliament. An address, in reply to the Queen's speech, was adopted in both houses of Parliament without amendment. In the House of Lords Earl Derby reviewed at length the foreign policy of the Government contending that it was injurious and humiliating to England. The rejection of the Emperor Napoleon's proposal for a European Congress, and of his invitation to recognize the Government of the Confederate States, together with the fruitless negotiations with Russia respecting Poland, and the interference in the Dano German difficulty, were severally referred to by End Darby, and although he did not oppose the address he severely censured Earl Russell's foreign policy. Earl Russell, in reply, explained the Dano German difficulty, and showed that England was quite unfettered in the matter, never having given the slightest promise of assistance to Denmark. In the House of Commons Mr. Disraeli spoke in a similar strain to Earl Derby, assailing th
Preussen (search for this): article 4
he matter, never having given the slightest promise of assistance to Denmark. In the House of Commons Mr. Disraeli spoke in a similar strain to Earl Derby, assailing the foreign policy of the Government. Lord Palmerston replied, vigorously defending the course of Earl Russell. Mr. Gladstone explained that the promise of England to stand by Denmark was given under circumstances different from those which control the present war. Mr. Layard read dispatches from Austria and Prussia, stating that whatever arrangements might be mad relative to Schleswig and Holstein, The great Powers would be consulted. After some other speeches the address to the Queen was agreed to. In the course of his remarks Mr. Disraeli contended that the Queen's speech should have made some reference to American affairs, and complained of its silence on this and other important subjects. Lord Palmerston replied that the Government could only have repeated what has often been said b
United States (United States) (search for this): article 4
Late European news The British Parliament. An address, in reply to the Queen's speech, was adopted in both houses of Parliament without amendment. In the House of Lords Earl Derby reviewed at length the foreign policy of the Government contending that it was injurious and humiliating to England. The rejection of the Emperor Napoleon's proposal for a European Congress, and of his invitation to recognize the Government of the Confederate States, together with the fruitless negotiations with Russia respecting Poland, and the interference in the Dano German difficulty, were severally referred to by End Darby, and although he did not oppose the address he severely censured Earl Russell's foreign policy. Earl Russell, in reply, explained the Dano German difficulty, and showed that England was quite unfettered in the matter, never having given the slightest promise of assistance to Denmark. In the House of Commons Mr. Disraeli spoke in a similar strain to Earl Derby,
Denmark (Denmark) (search for this): article 4
address he severely censured Earl Russell's foreign policy. Earl Russell, in reply, explained the Dano German difficulty, and showed that England was quite unfettered in the matter, never having given the slightest promise of assistance to Denmark. In the House of Commons Mr. Disraeli spoke in a similar strain to Earl Derby, assailing the foreign policy of the Government. Lord Palmerston replied, vigorously defending the course of Earl Russell. Mr. Gladstone explained that the promise of England to stand by Denmark was given under circumstances different from those which control the present war. Mr. Layard read dispatches from Austria and Prussia, stating that whatever arrangements might be mad relative to Schleswig and Holstein, The great Powers would be consulted. After some other speeches the address to the Queen was agreed to. In the course of his remarks Mr. Disraeli contended that the Queen's speech should have made some reference to American
Layard (search for this): article 4
owed that England was quite unfettered in the matter, never having given the slightest promise of assistance to Denmark. In the House of Commons Mr. Disraeli spoke in a similar strain to Earl Derby, assailing the foreign policy of the Government. Lord Palmerston replied, vigorously defending the course of Earl Russell. Mr. Gladstone explained that the promise of England to stand by Denmark was given under circumstances different from those which control the present war. Mr. Layard read dispatches from Austria and Prussia, stating that whatever arrangements might be mad relative to Schleswig and Holstein, The great Powers would be consulted. After some other speeches the address to the Queen was agreed to. In the course of his remarks Mr. Disraeli contended that the Queen's speech should have made some reference to American affairs, and complained of its silence on this and other important subjects. Lord Palmerston replied that the Government could onl
Whireside (search for this): article 4
arly Derisy repudiated the idea of British responsibility for the doings of the Alabama. He trusted that the Ministers had given such an answer to the claim of the Federal Government as would put and end to such monstrous demands in future. The debate on the Danish question generally inspired more confidence in commercial circles in England, but it was felt that it by no means defined what the shape the policy of England would take. In the House of Commons, on the 5th instant, Mr. Whireside called a to the distress in Ireland, and the consequent emigration of fighting men to America. Lord G. Manners expressed the hope that the Government would lose no opportunity in giving friendly advice to the American belligerents, with the view of the bloody, contest. The Schleswig Holstein war. The latest accounts state that the Danes had evacuated Schleswig and the Dannework, and fallen back on Flemburg, the Germans pursuing. A Hamburg dispatch of the morning of the 6t
Gladstone (search for this): article 4
h he did not oppose the address he severely censured Earl Russell's foreign policy. Earl Russell, in reply, explained the Dano German difficulty, and showed that England was quite unfettered in the matter, never having given the slightest promise of assistance to Denmark. In the House of Commons Mr. Disraeli spoke in a similar strain to Earl Derby, assailing the foreign policy of the Government. Lord Palmerston replied, vigorously defending the course of Earl Russell. Mr. Gladstone explained that the promise of England to stand by Denmark was given under circumstances different from those which control the present war. Mr. Layard read dispatches from Austria and Prussia, stating that whatever arrangements might be mad relative to Schleswig and Holstein, The great Powers would be consulted. After some other speeches the address to the Queen was agreed to. In the course of his remarks Mr. Disraeli contended that the Queen's speech should have made some
Poland (search for this): article 4
itish Parliament. An address, in reply to the Queen's speech, was adopted in both houses of Parliament without amendment. In the House of Lords Earl Derby reviewed at length the foreign policy of the Government contending that it was injurious and humiliating to England. The rejection of the Emperor Napoleon's proposal for a European Congress, and of his invitation to recognize the Government of the Confederate States, together with the fruitless negotiations with Russia respecting Poland, and the interference in the Dano German difficulty, were severally referred to by End Darby, and although he did not oppose the address he severely censured Earl Russell's foreign policy. Earl Russell, in reply, explained the Dano German difficulty, and showed that England was quite unfettered in the matter, never having given the slightest promise of assistance to Denmark. In the House of Commons Mr. Disraeli spoke in a similar strain to Earl Derby, assailing the foreign policy o
1 2