hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 2. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.) 191 19 Browse Search
Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 4. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.) 126 8 Browse Search
Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 3. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.) 98 12 Browse Search
Edward Porter Alexander, Military memoirs of a Confederate: a critical narrative 85 1 Browse Search
William A. Crafts, Life of Ulysses S. Grant: His Boyhood, Campaigns, and Services, Military and Civil. 67 13 Browse Search
Oliver Otis Howard, Autobiography of Oliver Otis Howard, major general , United States army : volume 1 63 5 Browse Search
John Harrison Wilson, The life of Charles Henry Dana 51 13 Browse Search
An English Combatant, Lieutenant of Artillery of the Field Staff., Battlefields of the South from Bull Run to Fredericksburgh; with sketches of Confederate commanders, and gossip of the camps. 42 12 Browse Search
Owen Wister, Ulysses S. Grant 40 2 Browse Search
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 37. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) 36 0 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: March 11, 1864., [Electronic resource]. You can also browse the collection for Halleck or search for Halleck in all documents.

Your search returned 9 results in 1 document section:

that the present incumbent of the chief command (Gen. Halleck) was deficient, and responsible for the many blung of Vicksburg? He was no particular friend of Gen. Halleck's but he wished to see fair play. Gen. Grant waflect upon any other commanders, or to strike at Gen. Halleck. There was no proper comparison between the serant is that man. He was not prepared to condemn General Halleck or Gen. Meade, or any one else, in regard to thname the officer for the position. He defended General Halleck, saying that he conducted the Corinth campaign ving conflicts success was was not the fault of General Halleck. When McClellan had conducted that uncesseful was at all any possible danger of-- it was not General Halleck that prevented the movement. With regard to thch may not be avoided. He had much contact with Gen. Halleck, and he could any no man labored more attentivel many, but so had other distinguished officers. Gen. Halleck had declared a year or more ago that slavery was