hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
Gen Grant 30 0 Browse Search
Gen Lee 26 0 Browse Search
United States (United States) 20 0 Browse Search
Richmond (Virginia, United States) 18 0 Browse Search
Sheridan 16 0 Browse Search
Danville (Virginia, United States) 14 0 Browse Search
Burkesville (Kentucky, United States) 14 0 Browse Search
Seward 12 4 Browse Search
Gen Mahone 12 0 Browse Search
City Point (Virginia, United States) 12 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: June 25, 1864., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 31 total hits in 6 results.

Mexico (Mexico, Mexico) (search for this): article 3
of the recent Monroe Doctrine resolution of the Yankee Congress: Gentlemen: The recent vote of the House of Representatives at Washington, on the subject of Mexico, has given rise to certain interpretations which it will be as well to rectify. The idea has arisen that this vote might induce the United States to adopt towardeven seen from the point of view of the United States themselves, the choice could not be doubtful between the establishment of a stable and regular Government in Mexico and the perpetuation of an anarchy and its attendant evils, which they themselves had first felt the effects of and called attention to. The reorganization of a gource of advantage, because it opens for them a new market, and one by which they more than any one will profit, on account of their proximity. The prosperity of Mexico corresponds with their truest interests, and I could not believe that the Cabinet of Washington would recognize this truth. This answer to Mr Dayton's communicat
United States (United States) (search for this): article 3
ns which it will be as well to rectify. The idea has arisen that this vote might induce the United States to adopt towards us a new attitude, of such a nature as to affect the cordial feelings exista European Power, on any point of the American continent. But we must consider that, in the United States, above all others, the legislative assembly may indulge in demonstrations of this character r us to suspect it of any thoughts of compromising, by hasty acts, the true interests of the United States. In expressing to Mr Dayton how much satisfaction the assurance he was commissioned to give the Emperor, I added that I thought, in fact, that, even seen from the point of view of the United States themselves, the choice could not be doubtful between the establishment of a stable and reguld security will enable to play an important economical part in the world, should be, for the United States especially, a real source of advantage, because it opens for them a new market, and one by w
Dayton (search for this): article 3
s made it a duty spontaneously to anticipate and obviate any unfavorable impressions that we might have formed from it. Mr Dayton called upon me to read a dispatch addressed to him by the Secretary of State for the Union, repudiating all responsibilthe Mexican question any line of conduct other than that which he has followed up to the present time. I answered Mr Dayton that nothing, according to our ideas, could justify a change; that our confidence in the wisdom and prudence of the Ameo suspect it of any thoughts of compromising, by hasty acts, the true interests of the United States. In expressing to Mr Dayton how much satisfaction the assurance he was commissioned to give me caused to the Government of the Emperor, I added thair truest interests, and I could not believe that the Cabinet of Washington would recognize this truth. This answer to Mr Dayton's communication, and the fact of this communication itself, must show you sufficiently in what light the incident on wh
Drouyn De L'Huys (search for this): article 3
seen from the point of view of the United States themselves, the choice could not be doubtful between the establishment of a stable and regular Government in Mexico and the perpetuation of an anarchy and its attendant evils, which they themselves had first felt the effects of and called attention to. The reorganization of a great country, which the return of order and security will enable to play an important economical part in the world, should be, for the United States especially, a real source of advantage, because it opens for them a new market, and one by which they more than any one will profit, on account of their proximity. The prosperity of Mexico corresponds with their truest interests, and I could not believe that the Cabinet of Washington would recognize this truth. This answer to Mr Dayton's communication, and the fact of this communication itself, must show you sufficiently in what light the incident on which I now write to you must be regarded. Drouyn de L'Huys.
Seward (search for this): article 3
formed from it. Mr Dayton called upon me to read a dispatch addressed to him by the Secretary of State for the Union, repudiating all responsibility on the part of the Cabinet of Washington in this matter, and establishing the principle that a vote of the House of Representatives or of the Senate, or even of both Houses, while it would naturally be a subject for the serious attention of the Cabinet, could not possibly oblige it to modify its policy or deprive it of its liberty of action. Mr Seward sees no reason for adopting in the Mexican question any line of conduct other than that which he has followed up to the present time. I answered Mr Dayton that nothing, according to our ideas, could justify a change; that our confidence in the wisdom and prudence of the American Cabinet was too great for us to suspect it of any thoughts of compromising, by hasty acts, the true interests of the United States. In expressing to Mr Dayton how much satisfaction the assurance he was commi
May 4th (search for this): article 3
Circular from Minister de L'huys on the Monroe Doctrine. The following is a circular from the French Minister of Foreign Affairs to the French Agents in foreign ports, (dated May 4,) upon the subject of the recent Monroe Doctrine resolution of the Yankee Congress: Gentlemen: The recent vote of the House of Representatives at Washington, on the subject of Mexico, has given rise to certain interpretations which it will be as well to rectify. The idea has arisen that this vote might induce the United States to adopt towards us a new attitude, of such a nature as to affect the cordial feelings existing between the two countries, or, at any rate, to complicate the Mexican question by embarrassments arising from without. We need only, however, observe the circumstances under which the manifestation alluded to took place to understand that the vote is very far from possessing the importance imputed to it. It is doubtless the reflection of the feeling so carefully fostered by th