hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
United States (United States) 42 0 Browse Search
B. F. Butler 22 0 Browse Search
William Tecumseh Sherman 14 0 Browse Search
Robert J. Christian 14 0 Browse Search
U. S. Grant 14 0 Browse Search
South Carolina (South Carolina, United States) 12 0 Browse Search
Mexico (Mexico, Mexico) 10 0 Browse Search
A. Lincoln 10 0 Browse Search
North Carolina (North Carolina, United States) 10 0 Browse Search
Cox 8 8 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: January 31, 1865., [Electronic resource].

Found 663 total hits in 337 results.

1 2 3 4 5 6 ...
William Tecumseh Sherman (search for this): article 1
General Sherman and Savannah. Accounts of refugees from Savannah, heretofore published in this paper, concur in stating that General Sherman has publicly declared that he may not be able to restrain his troops when he invades South Carolina, aGeneral Sherman has publicly declared that he may not be able to restrain his troops when he invades South Carolina, and he does not know that he shall attempt to. Every-one knows what the rank and file of invading armies are most composed of. They are, in general, the refuse of society, the scum of the nations, outcasts, outlaws and Pariahs of the earth. Ever of old and young from one end of South Carolina to the other. That is what it means; nothing more, nothing less. General Sherman need not say that he cannot restrain his troops.--If he cannot, he is unfit for his position. Any general, who chooses, has at his disposal ample means of enforcing discipline and good behavior. When Sherman intimates his doubts whether he shall attempt to restrain his soldiers, he gives us the only reason why he cannot. It remains to be seen whether our o
South Carolina (South Carolina, United States) (search for this): article 1
General Sherman and Savannah. Accounts of refugees from Savannah, heretofore published in this paper, concur in stating that General Sherman has publicly declared that he may not be able to restrain his troops when he invades South Carolina, and he does not know that he shall attempt to. Every-one knows what the rank and file of invading armies are most composed of. They are, in general, the refuse of society, the scum of the nations, outcasts, outlaws and Pariahs of the earth. Even outh. What human imagination can compass the horrors which the removal of all restraint from such armies means? It means the burning of every house, the dishonor of every woman, the indiscriminate murder of old and young from one end of South Carolina to the other. That is what it means; nothing more, nothing less. General Sherman need not say that he cannot restrain his troops.--If he cannot, he is unfit for his position. Any general, who chooses, has at his disposal ample means of enf
Americans (search for this): article 2
ver could sink any ship in the British navy! The speech of Captain Winslow, of the Kearsarge, who was lately complimented with a dinner in Philadelphia, will also make pleasant reading for an English breakfast table. The gallant Captain declared it was fitting that the fight should take place where it did, to show that the United States is as invincible upon the sea as upon the land; and wound up with quoting a remark of one of his sailors to a Frenchman--"the Alabama's officers were Americans; her crew were Englishmen that is the reason we sent her to the bottom"--which was received with loud cheers. We understand Captain Winslow to mean by this that Englishmen can be more easily whipped than Confederates. The New York Tribune has another tidbit, which we respectfully recommend to Mr. Bull's digestion. Referring, editorially, to Seward's late letter to Minister Adams in regard to Lord Wharncliffe's request to contribute funds for the relief of Confederate prisoners in t
Seward (search for this): article 2
le upon the sea as upon the land; and wound up with quoting a remark of one of his sailors to a Frenchman--"the Alabama's officers were Americans; her crew were Englishmen that is the reason we sent her to the bottom"--which was received with loud cheers. We understand Captain Winslow to mean by this that Englishmen can be more easily whipped than Confederates. The New York Tribune has another tidbit, which we respectfully recommend to Mr. Bull's digestion. Referring, editorially, to Seward's late letter to Minister Adams in regard to Lord Wharncliffe's request to contribute funds for the relief of Confederate prisoners in the United States, the Tribune says: "We know that we possess the power, without taking away a single soldier and facing the rebels, to brush away Canada like gossamer; and without taking a single vessel from our blockade to sink every ship in the British navy, as if they were but cockleshell. Yet we will have little or no trouble to put Englishmen on their
Adams (search for this): article 2
land; and wound up with quoting a remark of one of his sailors to a Frenchman--"the Alabama's officers were Americans; her crew were Englishmen that is the reason we sent her to the bottom"--which was received with loud cheers. We understand Captain Winslow to mean by this that Englishmen can be more easily whipped than Confederates. The New York Tribune has another tidbit, which we respectfully recommend to Mr. Bull's digestion. Referring, editorially, to Seward's late letter to Minister Adams in regard to Lord Wharncliffe's request to contribute funds for the relief of Confederate prisoners in the United States, the Tribune says: "We know that we possess the power, without taking away a single soldier and facing the rebels, to brush away Canada like gossamer; and without taking a single vessel from our blockade to sink every ship in the British navy, as if they were but cockleshell. Yet we will have little or no trouble to put Englishmen on their better behavior. Whatever d
Bull (search for this): article 2
er to the bottom"--which was received with loud cheers. We understand Captain Winslow to mean by this that Englishmen can be more easily whipped than Confederates. The New York Tribune has another tidbit, which we respectfully recommend to Mr. Bull's digestion. Referring, editorially, to Seward's late letter to Minister Adams in regard to Lord Wharncliffe's request to contribute funds for the relief of Confederate prisoners in the United States, the Tribune says: "We know that we possess navy and the press of the United States are all clamorous for a set-to with honest John. Sherman threatens Hyde Park; Porter and the Kearsarge are eager to sink British ships; the Tribune will brush away Canada like gossamer. In the meantime, Mr. Bull stands hat in hand, bows politely at every fresh tweak of his nose, and protests that he had no intention of giving offence. It makes us melancholy to behold our venerable grandson thus humiliated. We propose that the Confederacy offer its med
Porter (search for this): article 2
Commodore Porter has lately made a report of the operations of the monitors and iron-clads in the assault upon Fort Fisher which will attract attention abroad, from the information which it gives of the working of this new class of vessels in a heavy sea and bad weather, as well as their capacities of attack and defence. The technicalities of the description will be relieved to the mind of the general reader in England by the assurance which Commodore Porter takes occasion to give in his report, that one of these vessels could easily run over to England, destroy one of their naval stations, and, moreover could sink any ship in the British navy!e the direction of the tide. The army, the navy and the press of the United States are all clamorous for a set-to with honest John. Sherman threatens Hyde Park; Porter and the Kearsarge are eager to sink British ships; the Tribune will brush away Canada like gossamer. In the meantime, Mr. Bull stands hat in hand, bows politely
Winslow (search for this): article 2
assurance which Commodore Porter takes occasion to give in his report, that one of these vessels could easily run over to England, destroy one of their naval stations, and, moreover could sink any ship in the British navy! The speech of Captain Winslow, of the Kearsarge, who was lately complimented with a dinner in Philadelphia, will also make pleasant reading for an English breakfast table. The gallant Captain declared it was fitting that the fight should take place where it did, to shownd; and wound up with quoting a remark of one of his sailors to a Frenchman--"the Alabama's officers were Americans; her crew were Englishmen that is the reason we sent her to the bottom"--which was received with loud cheers. We understand Captain Winslow to mean by this that Englishmen can be more easily whipped than Confederates. The New York Tribune has another tidbit, which we respectfully recommend to Mr. Bull's digestion. Referring, editorially, to Seward's late letter to Minister
William Tecumseh Sherman (search for this): article 2
ssamer; and without taking a single vessel from our blockade to sink every ship in the British navy, as if they were but cockleshell. Yet we will have little or no trouble to put Englishmen on their better behavior. Whatever does not seriously damage us, we let pass with a scornful word or two; whatever does seriously damage us, we quietly reserve for further settlement." These little straws indicate the direction of the tide. The army, the navy and the press of the United States are all clamorous for a set-to with honest John. Sherman threatens Hyde Park; Porter and the Kearsarge are eager to sink British ships; the Tribune will brush away Canada like gossamer. In the meantime, Mr. Bull stands hat in hand, bows politely at every fresh tweak of his nose, and protests that he had no intention of giving offence. It makes us melancholy to behold our venerable grandson thus humiliated. We propose that the Confederacy offer its mediation between England and the United States.
Canada (Canada) (search for this): article 2
regard to Lord Wharncliffe's request to contribute funds for the relief of Confederate prisoners in the United States, the Tribune says: "We know that we possess the power, without taking away a single soldier and facing the rebels, to brush away Canada like gossamer; and without taking a single vessel from our blockade to sink every ship in the British navy, as if they were but cockleshell. Yet we will have little or no trouble to put Englishmen on their better behavior. Whatever does not serthe direction of the tide. The army, the navy and the press of the United States are all clamorous for a set-to with honest John. Sherman threatens Hyde Park; Porter and the Kearsarge are eager to sink British ships; the Tribune will brush away Canada like gossamer. In the meantime, Mr. Bull stands hat in hand, bows politely at every fresh tweak of his nose, and protests that he had no intention of giving offence. It makes us melancholy to behold our venerable grandson thus humiliated. We p
1 2 3 4 5 6 ...