hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
United States (United States) 42 0 Browse Search
John Wren 24 0 Browse Search
James Callahan 22 0 Browse Search
Thaddeus Stevens 15 1 Browse Search
Tom Corwin 14 0 Browse Search
H. J. Raymond 13 1 Browse Search
Isabella Ould 13 1 Browse Search
Alabama (Alabama, United States) 12 0 Browse Search
Louisiana (Louisiana, United States) 10 0 Browse Search
William H. Seward 10 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: December 20, 1865., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 5 total hits in 2 results.

Craven (search for this): article 4
The trial of Commodore Craven has had a singular termination. The charge alleged against him was failing to attack the Stonewall with the Niagara and Sacramento at Coronna. The court adjudged him guilty "in a degree," and sentenced him to bequestion of the actual culpability of the accused, and winds up with setting all the proceedings aside and releasing Commodore Craven from arrest. It may be presumptuous in landsmen to venture an opinion in opposition to the "findings" of such o and the three Rear Admirals and Captain that composed the court. But from all we have heard of the Stonewall and of Captain Craven's vessels, we are inclined to think that if he had attacked that ship, he would have been very properly arraigned for rashness and foolhardiness. In all likelihood, the gallant Craven and his vessels would have been past "finding" in that event, except at the bottom of the sea. Neither of his craft were fitted for even a bare collision with such a monster as the S
Farragut (search for this): article 4
ry of the Navy sent back the "finding" to the court for revision; whereupon they repeated their "finding." The Secretary reviews the proceedings, says it is impossible for the action of the court to arrive at an opinion on the question of the actual culpability of the accused, and winds up with setting all the proceedings aside and releasing Commodore Craven from arrest. It may be presumptuous in landsmen to venture an opinion in opposition to the "findings" of such old salts as Vice-Admiral Farragut and the three Rear Admirals and Captain that composed the court. But from all we have heard of the Stonewall and of Captain Craven's vessels, we are inclined to think that if he had attacked that ship, he would have been very properly arraigned for rashness and foolhardiness. In all likelihood, the gallant Craven and his vessels would have been past "finding" in that event, except at the bottom of the sea. Neither of his craft were fitted for even a bare collision with such a monst