Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: December 20, 1865., [Electronic resource]. You can also browse the collection for Matthews or search for Matthews in all documents.

Your search returned 3 results in 1 document section:

The Daily Dispatch: December 20, 1865., [Electronic resource], article 5 (search)
they had all been summoned. All but four answered to their names. Mr. Johnson said he was ready to proceed with the investigation but for the absence of Mrs. Matthews. She was one of the original witnesses, and her presence was very material to the case. If the Court would defer the investigation for a day or two, Mrs. Ould would herself go for Mrs. Matthews, who was in the country, and bring her to the city. The defence had no power to summon witnesses. Mrs. Matthews had been placed upon the list of witnesses for the prosecution, and Mrs. Ould took it for granted that she would be summoned by the other side. He hoped the Mayor would adjourn the Mrs. Matthews had been placed upon the list of witnesses for the prosecution, and Mrs. Ould took it for granted that she would be summoned by the other side. He hoped the Mayor would adjourn the case until Thursday. His Honor said that there were witnesses here from Chesterfield county, and he did not deem it proper to compel their attendance day after day. Mr. Johnson renewed his appeal for delay. His client had been constantly punctual in her attendance. The Mayor said that Thursday there would be an elec