hide
Named Entity Searches
hide
Sorting
You can sort these results in two ways:
- By entity
- Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
- By position (current method)
- As the entities appear in the document.
You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.
hide
Most Frequent Entities
The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.
Entity | Max. Freq | Min. Freq | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
300 AD - 399 AD | 90 | 90 | Browse | Search |
1500 AD - 1599 AD | 58 | 58 | Browse | Search |
100 AD - 199 AD | 31 | 31 | Browse | Search |
500 AD - 599 AD | 30 | 30 | Browse | Search |
200 AD - 299 AD | 24 | 24 | Browse | Search |
179 BC | 20 | 20 | Browse | Search |
1400 AD - 1499 AD | 19 | 19 | Browse | Search |
400 AD - 499 AD | 19 | 19 | Browse | Search |
1100 AD - 1199 AD | 17 | 17 | Browse | Search |
700 AD - 799 AD | 15 | 15 | Browse | Search |
View all entities in this document... |
Browsing named entities in a specific section of Samuel Ball Platner, Thomas Ashby, A Topographical Dictionary of Ancient Rome. Search the whole document.
Found 4 total hits in 4 results.
312 AD (search for this): entry arcus-constantini
ARCUS CONSTANTINI
* erected by the senate in honour of Constantine to
commemorate his victory over Maxentius in 312 A.D., as the inscription
in the attic (CIL vi. 1139) records. The date of its completion is fixed
to 315-316 A.D. by the mention of the decennalia in the inscriptions of
the side arches; and Grossi-Gondi decides for 316 because the consulship
is omitted, whereas in 315 he held it for the fourth time. It is not
mentioned by any of our literary sources. It stands at the beginning of
the road which traverses the valley between the Palatine and the Caelian
from the Colosseum to the south-east end of the circus Maximus, and which
is often (though without warrant) called via Triumphalis. The road
did not, however, run through it, and indeed lay at a somewhat lower
level, though not so low as to necessitate steps for foot-passengers to
pass through (Mitt. 1891, 92). The archways and the space round the
arch are paved with travertine. The arch is built of white marble;- it
i
176 AD (search for this): entry arcus-constantini
316 AD (search for this): entry arcus-constantini
ARCUS CONSTANTINI
* erected by the senate in honour of Constantine to
commemorate his victory over Maxentius in 312 A.D., as the inscription
in the attic (CIL vi. 1139) records. The date of its completion is fixed
to 315-316 A.D. by the mention of the decennalia in the inscriptions of
the side arches; and Grossi-Gondi decides for 316 because the consulship
is omitted, whereas in 315 he held it for the fourth time. It is not
mentioned by any of our literary sources. It stands at the beginning of
the road which traverses the valley between the Palatine and the Caelian
from the Colosseum to the south-east end of the circus Maximus, and which
is often (though without warrant) called via Triumphalis. The road
did not, however, run through it, and indeed lay at a somewhat lower
level, though not so low as to necessitate steps for foot-passengers to
pass through (Mitt. 1891, 92). The archways and the space round the
arch are paved with travertine. The arch is built of white marble;- it
315 AD - 316 AD (search for this): entry arcus-constantini
ARCUS CONSTANTINI
* erected by the senate in honour of Constantine to
commemorate his victory over Maxentius in 312 A.D., as the inscription
in the attic (CIL vi. 1139) records. The date of its completion is fixed
to 315-316 A.D. by the mention of the decennalia in the inscriptions of
the side arches; and Grossi-Gondi decides for 316 because the consulship
is omitted, whereas in 315 he held it for the fourth time. It is not
mentioned by any of our literary sources. It stands at the beginning of
the road which traverses the valley between the Palatine and the Caelian
from the Colosseum to the south-east end of the circus Maximus, and which
is often (though without warrant) called via Triumphalis. The road
did not, however, run through it, and indeed lay at a somewhat lower
level, though not so low as to necessitate steps for foot-passengers to
pass through (Mitt. 1891, 92). The archways and the space round the
arch are paved with travertine. The arch is built of white marble;- it
i