hide
Named Entity Searches
hide
Sorting
You can sort these results in two ways:
- By entity
- Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
- By position (current method)
- As the entities appear in the document.
You are currently sorting in descending order. Sort in ascending order.
hide
Most Frequent Entities
The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.
Entity | Max. Freq | Min. Freq | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Braxton Bragg | 958 | 6 | Browse | Search |
Joseph Hooker | 769 | 5 | Browse | Search |
George G. Meade | 728 | 6 | Browse | Search |
Vicksburg (Mississippi, United States) | 717 | 1 | Browse | Search |
George H. Thomas | 542 | 8 | Browse | Search |
Chattanooga (Tennessee, United States) | 485 | 1 | Browse | Search |
Gettysburg (Pennsylvania, United States) | 465 | 1 | Browse | Search |
James Longstreet | 450 | 6 | Browse | Search |
Fredericksburg, Va. (Virginia, United States) | 398 | 2 | Browse | Search |
Fitzhugh Lee | 393 | 5 | Browse | Search |
View all entities in this document... |
Browsing named entities in a specific section of Robert Underwood Johnson, Clarence Clough Buell, Battles and Leaders of the Civil War. Volume 3.. Search the whole document.
Found 113 total hits in 35 results.
Washington (United States) (search for this): chapter 2.10
Lee's Hill (Virginia, United States) (search for this): chapter 2.10
North Carolina (North Carolina, United States) (search for this): chapter 2.10
Virginia (Virginia, United States) (search for this): chapter 2.10
Ransom's division at Fredericksburg. by Robert Ransom, Rrigadier-General, C. S. A.
In The century magazine for August, 1886, General James Longstreet published what he saw of the battle of Fredericksburg, Va., December 13th, 1862.
[See p. 70.]
The omissions in that article were so glaring, and did such injustice, that I wrote to him and requested him to correct what would produce false impressions.
His answer was unsatisfactory, but promised that, I [Longstreet] expect in the near fut eason of my immediate care of the point attacked. My official report exhibits no self-seeking nor partial discriminations.
Upon a letter from me (of the 17th of December, 1862) to General R. H. Chilton, assistant adjutant-general Army of Northern Virginia, wherein I protest against the ignoring of my command in some telegraphic dispatches to the War Department at Richmond relative to the battle of the 13th, General Longstreet indorses these words: General Ransom's division was engaged throug
Fredericksburg, Va. (Virginia, United States) (search for this): chapter 2.10
Ransom's division at Fredericksburg. by Robert Ransom, Rrigadier-General, C. S. A.
In The century magazine for August, 1886, General James Longstreet published what he saw of the battle of Fredericksburg, Va., December 13th, 1862.
[See p. 70.]
The omissions in that article were so glaring, and did such injustice, that I w y as the troops were posted.
Lee's report continues farther on:
. . . About 11 A. M., having massed his [the enemy's] troops under cover of the houses of Fredericksburg, he moved forward in strong columns to seize Marye's and Willis's hills.
General Ransom advanced Cooke's brigade to the top of the hill, and placed his own, g the Official Records in Washington.
I may be pardoned for remembering with pride that among the Confederate troops engaged on the whole battle-field of Fredericksburg, Va., December 13th, 1862, none were more honorably distinguished than the sons of North Carolina, and those of them who, with brother soldiers from other States
Lafayette McLaws (search for this): chapter 2.10
Robert Ransom (search for this): chapter 2.10
Ransom's division at Fredericksburg. by Robert Ransom, Rrigadier-General, C. S. A.
In The centuRobert Ransom, Rrigadier-General, C. S. A.
In The century magazine for August, 1886, General James Longstreet published what he saw of the battle of Frede od extending to the right in the order named.
Ransom's division supported the batteries on Marye's Laws's division and the 24th North Carolina of Ransom's brigade were stationed, protected by a stone ediate care of this point was committed to General Ransom.
The italics in this paper are all min umns to seize Marye's and Willis's hills.
General Ransom advanced Cooke's brigade to the top of the nd at the foot of the hill, to which point General Ransom also advanced three other regiments.
G t, in his official report, says:
. . . General Ransom on Marye's Hill was charged with the immed f his brigades: one, Kemper's, was sent to General Ransom to be placed in some secure position to be rvant, J. L. Kemper, Brigadier-General. Brig.-Gen. Ransom, Commanding Division.
As stated in m
[2 more...]
James H. Cooper (search for this): chapter 2.10
George E. Pickett (search for this): chapter 2.10
Thomas R. R. Cobb (search for this): chapter 2.10