hide
Named Entity Searches
hide
Sorting
You can sort these results in two ways:
- By entity (current method)
- Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
- By position
- As the entities appear in the document.
You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.
hide
Most Frequent Entities
The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.
Entity | Max. Freq | Min. Freq | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Braxton Bragg | 958 | 6 | Browse | Search |
Joseph Hooker | 769 | 5 | Browse | Search |
George G. Meade | 728 | 6 | Browse | Search |
Vicksburg (Mississippi, United States) | 717 | 1 | Browse | Search |
George H. Thomas | 542 | 8 | Browse | Search |
Chattanooga (Tennessee, United States) | 485 | 1 | Browse | Search |
Gettysburg (Pennsylvania, United States) | 465 | 1 | Browse | Search |
James Longstreet | 450 | 6 | Browse | Search |
Fredericksburg, Va. (Virginia, United States) | 398 | 2 | Browse | Search |
Fitzhugh Lee | 393 | 5 | Browse | Search |
View all entities in this document... |
Browsing named entities in a specific section of Robert Underwood Johnson, Clarence Clough Buell, Battles and Leaders of the Civil War. Volume 3.. Search the whole document.
Found 74 total hits in 26 results.
May 2nd (search for this): chapter 3.32
May 3rd (search for this): chapter 3.32
April 23rd, 1863 AD (search for this): chapter 3.32
Richard H. Anderson (search for this): chapter 3.32
R. E. Colston (search for this): chapter 3.32
Lee's knowledge of Hooker's movements. by R. E. Colston, Major-General, C. S. A.
The assertion that Hooker's move upon Chancellorsville was a surprise to General Lee is a great mistake.
Every day Lee had information of Hooker's movements.
The following letter, sent by Lee to Jackson, and by the latter to me, has never been is my letter to him to which Lee refers:
headquarters, A. N. Va., April 23, 1863. Lieut.-General T. J. Jackson, Com'g Corps. General:
I have received General Colston's letter of 8 1/2 o'clock to-day which you forwarded to me. I think from the account given me by L't-Col. Smith of the Engineers, who was at Port Royal yester to cross the river it will be above Fredericksburg.
Very respectfully,
R. E. Lee, General
The letter was indorsed by Jackson, Respectfully referred to General Colston for his guidance.
It was also marked confidential, and both the front and the back of the envelope were marked private, so that not even my adjutant-general
Jubal A. Early (search for this): chapter 3.32
Ambrose P. Hill (search for this): chapter 3.32
Joseph Hooker (search for this): chapter 3.32
Lee's knowledge of Hooker's movements. by R. E. Colston, Major-General, C. S. A.
The assertion that Hooker's move upon Chancellorsville was a surprise to General Lee is a great mistake.
Every dHooker's move upon Chancellorsville was a surprise to General Lee is a great mistake.
Every day Lee had information of Hooker's movements.
The following letter, sent by Lee to Jackson, and by the latter to me, has never been out of my possession since.
It shows the remarkable intuition thatHooker's movements.
The following letter, sent by Lee to Jackson, and by the latter to me, has never been out of my possession since.
It shows the remarkable intuition that enabled General Lee on so many occasions to foresee and penetrate the intentions of his antagonist.
In this case a demonstration had been made on our extreme right at Port Royal, and without waiting casualties and much exhausted by fatigue, hunger, and thirst; but it was preparing to move upon Hooker's last line of intrenchments, erected during the night on very strong positions.
My division wa he situation at Fredericksburg), and I wondered why we were not to continue our advance and hurl Hooker into the river.
Lee left the field at Chancellorsville immediately after giving me the above or
Oliver O. Howard (search for this): chapter 3.32
Huntington W. Jackson (search for this): chapter 3.32