hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
Jefferson Davis 100 6 Browse Search
United States (United States) 88 0 Browse Search
Rufus Choate 82 4 Browse Search
South Carolina (South Carolina, United States) 78 0 Browse Search
James Buchanan 66 2 Browse Search
England (United Kingdom) 62 0 Browse Search
Washington (United States) 52 0 Browse Search
John Y. Mason 48 0 Browse Search
Edward Pollard 48 4 Browse Search
Massachusetts (Massachusetts, United States) 44 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of Charles Congdon, Tribune Essays: Leading Articles Contributing to the New York Tribune from 1857 to 1863. (ed. Horace Greeley). Search the whole document.

Found 45 total hits in 19 results.

1 2
London (United Kingdom) (search for this): chapter 9
aving somewhere read, or at some time heard, that an embassador is a person sent abroad to tell lies for his country ; a service which he did not care to undertake. To solve his doubts, he went to Mr. Edward Everett, who is authority in Boston for every point, from a disputed passage in Euripides to the configuration of the great toe of a statue, and asked him simply if he should be obliged to tell the lies aforesaid. Mr. Everett promptly responded in the negative. So Mr. Lawrence went to London, and gave those excellent dinners which to this day are recalled with grateful salivary glands by those who partook of them. Thus we have excellent authority for rejecting as a scandalous old libel, the mendacity theory. But there is yet another, the mendicity theory, which has lately been received with some favor. An embassador is sent abroad in order that he may make money enough to pay his debts; and it is understood that the present august representative of this country at the Court
Saint James (Missouri, United States) (search for this): chapter 9
Mr. Mason's manners once more. Anatomists have been much bothered to determine the uses of the pineal gland and the spleen; and what these mysterious organs are in the body physical, embassadors, ordinary and extraordinary, are in the body politic. When a respectable Boston merchant, more remarkable for his knowledge of domestics than of diplomacy, was appointed by our Government to St. James (where he cut a sumptuous figure and spent double his salary for the honor of his country), he had a painful recollection of having somewhere read, or at some time heard, that an embassador is a person sent abroad to tell lies for his country ; a service which he did not care to undertake. To solve his doubts, he went to Mr. Edward Everett, who is authority in Boston for every point, from a disputed passage in Euripides to the configuration of the great toe of a statue, and asked him simply if he should be obliged to tell the lies aforesaid. Mr. Everett promptly responded in the negative.
Washington (United States) (search for this): chapter 9
ween the two governments, concluded by hoping that he (Mr. Mason) would remain at his court for the coming four years. These words were heard by the Russian Embassador, who told our Minister that it was his duty to repeat the words thus addressed to him in his official capacity, to his Government, but Mr. Mason, with the modesty of true merit, has, I am sure, remained silent upon the subject. We rejoice that Mr. Mason's modesty has not kept this valuable information from the Cabinet at Washington, where it will produce an excitement. Mr. Buchanan will, of course, act upon the recommendation of Napoleon, as the preference of that monarch ought to be conclusive. So much for Mr. Mason as a diplomatist. But it is as a man of manners, of polish, of civility, of the best breeding, that he gets the cleanest certificate. So far from being a big bear, he is Chesterfieldian, and as punctilious as a professor of etiquette or a Chinese mandarin. Instead of needing instruction himself, he
Tunstall (Virginia, United States) (search for this): chapter 9
imself, he is just the man to teach others. Here is his character as given in The Richmond, Enquirer: In any question of manners, he possesses the kind sensibility to prompt, and, unimpaired, the just faculty to discriminate what, as regards the occasion, it seems most proper and befitting to do or to avoid. There is no name given, but we know the writer of this to be a gentleman by the fine language which he uses. It reminds us of a reply sent by a courtly negro to an invitation, in which he regretted that circumstances repugnant to the acquiesce would prevent his acceptance to the invite. Now we know why they want Mr. Mason to stay at the Court of France. They want him there to show them how to do it. Like Mr. Turveydrop's, his deportment is beautiful. Should stern policy demand his recall, let him be made Master of Ceremonies at the White House, and with a happy blending of foreign airs and native graces, show the ruler of this realm to his people. October 2, 1857.
Paris, Mo. (Missouri, United States) (search for this): chapter 9
ative of this country at the Court of Napoleon III., is retained in office expressly that he may realize to that pleasing extent. Our readers, particularly in these times of monetary pressure, will agree with us that no more commendable motive could actuate a man to do duty in short breeches upon gala-days at court; and at any rate, we are certain that the creditors of the gentleman alluded to will coincide with us in the opinion. As there is very little for an American minister to do in Paris, save to disport himself upon proper occasions before the imperial eyes, we do not see why Mr. Mason should not have the pay as well as another, provided there be no worthy Democrat who owes more and has less to pay it with, In such case, the shortest and hardest — up man should be allowed the privilege of procuring for American travelers, tickets of admission to see the Beast of the Tuileries. But Mr. Mason's claim must be considered as paramount until some Democrat entitled to write paupe
Euripides (search for this): chapter 9
ge of domestics than of diplomacy, was appointed by our Government to St. James (where he cut a sumptuous figure and spent double his salary for the honor of his country), he had a painful recollection of having somewhere read, or at some time heard, that an embassador is a person sent abroad to tell lies for his country ; a service which he did not care to undertake. To solve his doubts, he went to Mr. Edward Everett, who is authority in Boston for every point, from a disputed passage in Euripides to the configuration of the great toe of a statue, and asked him simply if he should be obliged to tell the lies aforesaid. Mr. Everett promptly responded in the negative. So Mr. Lawrence went to London, and gave those excellent dinners which to this day are recalled with grateful salivary glands by those who partook of them. Thus we have excellent authority for rejecting as a scandalous old libel, the mendacity theory. But there is yet another, the mendicity theory, which has lately
t were, sticking pins through his court-stockings directly into the embassadorial calves! And to impeach his conduct, too, at that Court of all others; a Court where everything is conducted upon principles of the very pinkiest propriety; a Court which maintains a grave Chamberlain expressly to teach people how to behave themselves, which official has written a hand-book of manners, to which Mr. Mason no doubt gives his nights and days, just as young persons desiring a good style of writing English, must give their nights and days to Addison! And to charge him, too, with hugging the Empress of that virtuous realm — an offense which, constructively, might be considered capital, and which might have obliged the offender to part with his head — a portion of the body necessary to the man if not to the embassador! And to impute to Mr. Mason this offence, when his fate was in the hands of James Buchanan — that mirror of continency, that more than Joseph, that Pamela of Presidents! But <
John Y. Mason (search for this): chapter 9
before the imperial eyes, we do not see why Mr. Mason should not have the pay as well as another, sion to see the Beast of the Tuileries. But Mr. Mason's claim must be considered as paramount untir these circumstances, what cruelty is it to Mr. Mason, and what injustice to his creditors, to cirhas written a hand-book of manners, to which Mr. Mason no doubt gives his nights and days, just as if not to the embassador! And to impute to Mr. Mason this offence, when his fate was in the handsnd children by these presents, that Embassador Mason did not hug the Empress. Two Virginians residiends indeed, have rushed to the rescue, and Mr. Mason's character is upon the courtliest of legs ariends say that the story has saddened him ) Mr. Mason has come burnished and refulgent and brightemonarch ought to be conclusive. So much for Mr. Mason as a diplomatist. But it is as a man of mance to the invite. Now we know why they want Mr. Mason to stay at the Court of France. They want h[5 more...]
Virginians (search for this): chapter 9
hen it is considered that The Richmond Enquirer, a journal usually so careful of the honor of the F. F. V., also gave the narration publicity. We both relied upon the alleged authority of The London Court Journal, which is your very Sir Oracle on scandals connected with palaces. As we were deceived into doing injustice to Mr. Mason, we accord him the amplest reparation in our power. Know all men, women and children by these presents, that Embassador Mason did not hug the Empress. Two Virginians residing in Paris-whether creditors or not does not appear — have written, the one to The National Intelligencer, the other to The Richmond Enquirer, indignantly denying the truth of the scurvy story; while the editor of The London Court Journal has solemnly declared over his (or her) own hand, that the hugging paragraph never appeared in that newspaper. The matter being beneath the notice of His Excellency, these two friends in need and friends indeed, have rushed to the rescue, and Mr.
Chamberlain (search for this): chapter 9
spute it. Under these circumstances, what cruelty is it to Mr. Mason, and what injustice to his creditors, to circulate false tales about his demeanor before royalty, thus touching him upon a most tender point, and, as it were, sticking pins through his court-stockings directly into the embassadorial calves! And to impeach his conduct, too, at that Court of all others; a Court where everything is conducted upon principles of the very pinkiest propriety; a Court which maintains a grave Chamberlain expressly to teach people how to behave themselves, which official has written a hand-book of manners, to which Mr. Mason no doubt gives his nights and days, just as young persons desiring a good style of writing English, must give their nights and days to Addison! And to charge him, too, with hugging the Empress of that virtuous realm — an offense which, constructively, might be considered capital, and which might have obliged the offender to part with his head — a portion of the body n
1 2