hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
Sterling Price 305 9 Browse Search
Missouri (Missouri, United States) 294 0 Browse Search
John Sappington Marmaduke 260 4 Browse Search
Nathaniel Lyon 184 2 Browse Search
Carthage Shelby 146 0 Browse Search
Arkansas (Arkansas, United States) 120 0 Browse Search
Joseph O. Shelby 115 3 Browse Search
E. W. Price 108 0 Browse Search
Springfield, Mo. (Missouri, United States) 102 0 Browse Search
Frederick Steele 99 1 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in Col. John C. Moore, Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 9.2, Missouri (ed. Clement Anselm Evans).

Found 6,151 total hits in 1,662 results.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ...
Indiana (Indiana, United States) (search for this): chapter 1
contest, toward the State, has grown with the lapse of time to the present day. During the seventy odd years which have passed, the habit of misrepresenting the State and its people has become fixed and ineradicable. In 1819 Missouri sought admission into the Union on terms entirely in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Constitution and the precedents established in the admission of other States—Kentucky, Tennessee, Louisiana and Mississippi in the South, and Vermont, Ohio, Indiana and Illinois in the North—with the difference that the former recognized the institution of domestic slavery, and the latter did not. But in each instance the people of the State seeking admission had decided the question for themselves. The territorial laws of Missouri recognized slavery. On that account the Northern members of Congress refused to admit it. The Southern members favored its admission, holding that the people of Missouri had a right to determine the question as they pleas
Iowa (Iowa, United States) (search for this): chapter 1
elements with which he had to deal as well as his opponents. He knew, besides, what the policy of the Federal government would be, and what support he could depend on. Both sides were getting ready to strike a decisive blow. But the Southern leaders were playing an open hand, while he was playing a secret one. The State occupied a precarious position. It was surrounded on three sides by Northern States, which were organizing and arming their citizens to invade it. The troops of Illinois, Iowa and Kansas were almost as much at Blair's disposal as those he was actively but secretly organizing in Missouri. Both sides were waiting. The Southern leaders did not know what they wanted to do, and consequently were not doing anything. As politicians they were shirking the responsibility of action, and waiting for some overt act on the part of the Federal authorities. Their attitude and policy suited Blair exactly. He was waiting, too, but at the same time he was working with a defi
Kansas (Kansas, United States) (search for this): chapter 1
lowed the passage by Congress of the Kansas-Nebraska bill still further aggravated public sentiment. A struggle began in Kansas between the partisans of the North and the South for the political control of the Territory, which was carried on with grd was frequently the scene of the most heated part of the struggle. The experiences of its people in the settlement of Kansas had forced upon them a knowledge of what Northern supremacy meant, as far as they and the people of the South were concersides by Northern States, which were organizing and arming their citizens to invade it. The troops of Illinois, Iowa and Kansas were almost as much at Blair's disposal as those he was actively but secretly organizing in Missouri. Both sides were rom the predatory and murderous incursions of armed bands of Kansans. So bitter was the feeling of the Free State men of Kansas that they never allowed an opportunity to harass, plunder and murder the people of Missouri to pass unimproved. A certai
Louisiana (Louisiana, United States) (search for this): chapter 1
t the feeling of hostility in the North engendered by that contest, toward the State, has grown with the lapse of time to the present day. During the seventy odd years which have passed, the habit of misrepresenting the State and its people has become fixed and ineradicable. In 1819 Missouri sought admission into the Union on terms entirely in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Constitution and the precedents established in the admission of other States—Kentucky, Tennessee, Louisiana and Mississippi in the South, and Vermont, Ohio, Indiana and Illinois in the North—with the difference that the former recognized the institution of domestic slavery, and the latter did not. But in each instance the people of the State seeking admission had decided the question for themselves. The territorial laws of Missouri recognized slavery. On that account the Northern members of Congress refused to admit it. The Southern members favored its admission, holding that the people of Mi
Missouri (Missouri, United States) (search for this): chapter 1
Chapter 1: Missouri in the war. Introductory the admission of Missouri to the Union tssumed definite form, with the application of Missouri for admission into the Union, and that the fetion for themselves. The territorial laws of Missouri recognized slavery. On that account the Nortred its admission, holding that the people of Missouri had a right to determine the question as they, the principal provisions of which were that Missouri should be admitted as a slaveholding State, bgreat mistake made by the Southern leaders in Missouri, and it was followed with fatal consistency bernment practically at his disposal as far as Missouri was concerned, and was well fitted by nature se he was actively but secretly organizing in Missouri. Both sides were waiting. The Southern ley to harass, plunder and murder the people of Missouri to pass unimproved. A certain Captain Montgoling by which the Northern people were animated, and their hostility to Missouri and Missourians. [8 more...]
Nebraska (Nebraska, United States) (search for this): chapter 1
Chapter 1: Missouri in the war. Introductory the admission of Missouri to the Union the beginning of the contest between the North and the South the Missouri compromise the Kansas Nebraska bill New England Emigrant aid societies the national election in 1862 the Southern element divided dangerous position of the State New party organizations and leaders the southwest expedition. to understand correctly the popular feeling in Missouri at the beginning of the War betweemained unrepealed on the statute-book until after the war. They were a protest against the indignity put upon the State in the terms imposed upon it in its admission to the Union. The events that followed the passage by Congress of the Kansas-Nebraska bill still further aggravated public sentiment. A struggle began in Kansas between the partisans of the North and the South for the political control of the Territory, which was carried on with great and constantly increasing bitterness on both
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) (search for this): chapter 1
on, and that the feeling of hostility in the North engendered by that contest, toward the State, has grown with the lapse of time to the present day. During the seventy odd years which have passed, the habit of misrepresenting the State and its people has become fixed and ineradicable. In 1819 Missouri sought admission into the Union on terms entirely in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Constitution and the precedents established in the admission of other States—Kentucky, Tennessee, Louisiana and Mississippi in the South, and Vermont, Ohio, Indiana and Illinois in the North—with the difference that the former recognized the institution of domestic slavery, and the latter did not. But in each instance the people of the State seeking admission had decided the question for themselves. The territorial laws of Missouri recognized slavery. On that account the Northern members of Congress refused to admit it. The Southern members favored its admission, holding that the p
Vermont (Vermont, United States) (search for this): chapter 1
endered by that contest, toward the State, has grown with the lapse of time to the present day. During the seventy odd years which have passed, the habit of misrepresenting the State and its people has become fixed and ineradicable. In 1819 Missouri sought admission into the Union on terms entirely in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Constitution and the precedents established in the admission of other States—Kentucky, Tennessee, Louisiana and Mississippi in the South, and Vermont, Ohio, Indiana and Illinois in the North—with the difference that the former recognized the institution of domestic slavery, and the latter did not. But in each instance the people of the State seeking admission had decided the question for themselves. The territorial laws of Missouri recognized slavery. On that account the Northern members of Congress refused to admit it. The Southern members favored its admission, holding that the people of Missouri had a right to determine the questio
Jefferson City (Missouri, United States) (search for this): chapter 1
d to the sectional purposes of the Republican party, to the election of Lincoln, to the policy of the coercion of the Southern States, and when the test came would have been united in regard to the position Missouri should take. But dissensions and antagonisms were created among them by bad management. The vote showed the Republicans were out. numbered nine to one. Their strength was mainly in St. Louis and the counties along the south side of the Missouri river between St. Louis and Jefferson City, in which, as well as in St. Louis, there was a large element of Germans. The seeds of Republicanism had been sown in the State by Thomas H. Benton, when he appealed to the people against the instructions of the legislature twelve years before. In the contest which ensued his friends had established an organ in St. Louis to advocate his cause, and his supporters, under the leadership of Francis P. Blair, Jr., had been organized into a party and were a compact and fanatical force in the
New England (United States) (search for this): chapter 1
Chapter 1: Missouri in the war. Introductory the admission of Missouri to the Union the beginning of the contest between the North and the South the Missouri compromise the Kansas Nebraska bill New England Emigrant aid societies the national election in 1862 the Southern element divided dangerous position of the State New party organizations and leaders the southwest expedition. to understand correctly the popular feeling in Missouri at the beginning of the War between the States, it is necessary to look back more than a generation prior to that time. It may be said that the political contest between the North and the South began, or at least assumed definite form, with the application of Missouri for admission into the Union, and that the feeling of hostility in the North engendered by that contest, toward the State, has grown with the lapse of time to the present day. During the seventy odd years which have passed, the habit of misrepresenting the State
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ...