hide
Named Entity Searches
hide
Sorting
You can sort these results in two ways:
- By entity
- Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
- By position (current method)
- As the entities appear in the document.
You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.
hide
Most Frequent Entities
The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.
Entity | Max. Freq | Min. Freq | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
R. E. Lee | 358 | 0 | Browse | Search |
James Longstreet | 283 | 3 | Browse | Search |
J. E. B. Stuart | 196 | 0 | Browse | Search |
R. S. Ewell | 190 | 2 | Browse | Search |
Robert Edward Lee | 139 | 9 | Browse | Search |
United States (United States) | 124 | 0 | Browse | Search |
A. P. Hill | 108 | 8 | Browse | Search |
Stonewall Jackson | 107 | 1 | Browse | Search |
W. W. Kirkland | 95 | 1 | Browse | Search |
Robert F. Hoke | 94 | 2 | Browse | Search |
View all entities in this document... |
Browsing named entities in a specific section of Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 23. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones). Search the whole document.
Found 361 total hits in 55 results.
Robertson (search for this): chapter 1.20
Wade Hampton (search for this): chapter 1.20
Rodes (search for this): chapter 1.20
John Buford (search for this): chapter 1.20
Zimmerman Davis (search for this): chapter 1.20
Imboden (search for this): chapter 1.20
R. E. Lee (search for this): chapter 1.20
[30 more...]
Robert Edward Lee (search for this): chapter 1.20
John Singleton Mosby (search for this): chapter 1.20
Longstreet and Stuart.
[from the Richmond (Va.) times, Feb'y 2, 1896.]
Highly interesting review by Colonel John S. Mosby.
Cause of the loss of Gettysburg.
Many of Longstreet's statements in his book Combatted by Colonel Mosby—The want of cavalry had nothing to do with the result of the battle.
General Longstreet, having acted a great part as a soldier, now appears as the historian of the war. His book will soon be buried in the dust of oblivion, but, fortunately for him, his fame does not rest upon what he has written, but what he has done.
No doubt he has had to endure much, as he says, for the sake of his opinions, as every man must who goes in advance of his age, and he has had strong provocation to speak with bitterness of some of his contemporaries, if he spoke of them at all. But his better angel would have told him that much that he has written about his brothersin-arms would injure his own reputation more than theirs, and that if he had suffered injustice in
Harry Heth (search for this): chapter 1.20