hide
Named Entity Searches
hide
Sorting
You can sort these results in two ways:
- By entity (current method)
- Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
- By position
- As the entities appear in the document.
You are currently sorting in descending order. Sort in ascending order.
hide
Most Frequent Entities
The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.
Entity | Max. Freq | Min. Freq | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Jefferson Davis | 17 | 1 | Browse | Search |
France (France) | 14 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Norfolk (Virginia, United States) | 13 | 1 | Browse | Search |
William T. Moore | 13 | 1 | Browse | Search |
Fred Blount | 12 | 0 | Browse | Search |
South Carolina (South Carolina, United States) | 12 | 0 | Browse | Search |
John O. Taylor | 10 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Reverdy Johnson | 10 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Virginia (Virginia, United States) | 8 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Wheat | 8 | 0 | Browse | Search |
View all entities in this document... |
Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: February 8, 1861., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.
Found 138 total hits in 50 results.
Savannah (Georgia, United States) (search for this): article 1
Montgomery (Alabama, United States) (search for this): article 1
The National crisis.
Interesting from the South--letter from Edward Everett — Comparative population of the Northern and Southern Confederacies — Washington dispatches.
The Montgomery (Ala.) correspondent of the Charleston Mercury, writing on the 2d inst., of the Cotton States' Convention, says:
Alabama's very equivocal invitation will bring a deputation from North Carolina, Tennessee, and perhaps other non-seceding States.
What they will do here, it is difficult to say. Being in the Union, they cannot join in the deliberations to construct a Southern Confederacy.
Their counsel and object doubtless will be delay — postponement; and in this policy they might support or make a party in the Convention, which may oppose immediate action and the organization of a Southern Confederacy.
They will fail in their efforts, however, although they may foster discontent.
The Mississippi State Convention elected a full representation to the Congress to be establish<
Wisconsin (Wisconsin, United States) (search for this): article 1
Vermont (Vermont, United States) (search for this): article 1
Utah (Utah, United States) (search for this): article 1
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) (search for this): article 1
North Carolina (North Carolina, United States) (search for this): article 1
The National crisis.
Interesting from the South--letter from Edward Everett — Comparative population of the Northern and Southern Confederacies — Washington dispatches.
The Montgomery (Ala.) correspondent of the Charleston Mercury, writing on the 2d inst., of the Cotton States' Convention, says:
Alabama's very equivocal invitation will bring a deputation from North Carolina, Tennessee, and perhaps other non-seceding States.
What they will do here, it is difficult to say. Being in the Union, they cannot join in the deliberations to construct a Southern Confederacy.
Their counsel and object doubtless will be delay — postponement; and in this policy they might support or make a party in the Convention, which may oppose immediate action and the organization of a Southern Confederacy.
They will fail in their efforts, however, although they may foster discontent.
The Mississippi State Convention elected a full representation to the Congress to be establishe<
Oregon (Oregon, United States) (search for this): article 1
New Jersey (New Jersey, United States) (search for this): article 1
Nebraska (Nebraska, United States) (search for this): article 1