hide
Named Entity Searches
hide
Sorting
You can sort these results in two ways:
- By entity
- Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
- By position (current method)
- As the entities appear in the document.
You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.
hide
Most Frequent Entities
The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.
Entity | Max. Freq | Min. Freq | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
United States (United States) | 38 | 0 | Browse | Search |
O. Jennings Wise | 28 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Branch | 22 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Lincoln | 18 | 10 | Browse | Search |
J. W. Davis | 15 | 1 | Browse | Search |
Jonathan Quincy Adams | 14 | 0 | Browse | Search |
James Moore | 14 | 0 | Browse | Search |
West Virginia (West Virginia, United States) | 14 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Scott | 10 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Reverdy Johnson | 10 | 0 | Browse | Search |
View all entities in this document... |
Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: February 18, 1861., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.
Found 23 total hits in 11 results.
France (France) (search for this): article 5
Paris, Ky. (Kentucky, United States) (search for this): article 5
The Bonaparte suit.
--By the New York's mails we have further particulars of the great case of Patterson.
vs. Bonaparte, which was opened at Paris, before the First Chambers of the Civil Tribunal of the Seine, on Friday, the 25th of last month, as our readers are aware from what has already appeared in the Herald.
From the very natural curiosity which the case excites, the court-room was as full as it could possibly be. The proceedings were opened by M. Legrand, acout for Mrs. Elizabeth Patterson, presenting the following conclusions: "That it may please the Tribunal to declare the marriage contracted on the 24th of December, 1803, between the late Prince Jerome and Elizabeth Patterson valid.
And also to take judicial cognizance (donner acte) that M. Bonaparte, while demanding that the marriage of the 24th of December,1803, may be declared valid, has never had any intention, to contest, and does not now contest, the civil and political effects of the union contracted in 180
Department de Ville de Paris (France) (search for this): article 5
M. Legrand (search for this): article 5
The Bonaparte suit.
--By the New York's mails we have further particulars of the great case of Patterson.
vs. Bonaparte, which was opened at Paris, before the First Chambers of the Civil Tribunal of the Seine, on Friday, the 25th of last month, as our readers are aware from what has already appeared in the Herald.
From the very natural curiosity which the case excites, the court-room was as full as it could possibly be. The proceedings were opened by M. Legrand, acout for Mrs. Elizabeth Patterson, presenting the following conclusions: "That it may please the Tribunal to declare the marriage contracted on the 24th of December, 1803, between the late Prince Jerome and Elizabeth Patterson valid.
And also to take judicial cognizance (donner acte) that M. Bonaparte, while demanding that the marriage of the 24th of December,1803, may be declared valid, has never had any intention, to contest, and does not now contest, the civil and political effects of the union contracted in 1807
M. Bonaparte (search for this): article 5
The Bonaparte suit.
--By the New York's mails we have further particulars of the great case of Patterson.
vs. Bonaparte, which was opened at Paris, before the First Chambers of the Civil Tribunal of the Seine, on Friday, the 25th of last month, as our readers are aware from what has already appeared in the Herald.
From the Bonaparte, which was opened at Paris, before the First Chambers of the Civil Tribunal of the Seine, on Friday, the 25th of last month, as our readers are aware from what has already appeared in the Herald.
From the very natural curiosity which the case excites, the court-room was as full as it could possibly be. The proceedings were opened by M. Legrand, acout for Mrs. Elizabeth Patterson, presenting the following conclusions: "That it may please the Tribunal to declare the marriage contracted on the 24th of December, 1803, between the late Prince Jerome and Elizabeth Patterson valid.
And also to take judicial cognizance (donner acte) that M. Bonaparte, while demanding that the marriage of the 24th of December,1803, may be declared valid, has never had any intention, to contest, and does not now contest, the civil and political effects of the union contracted in 18
Elizabeth Patterson (search for this): article 5
The Bonaparte suit.
--By the New York's mails we have further particulars of the great case of Patterson.
vs. Bonaparte, which was opened at Paris, before the First Chambers of the Civil Tribunal of the Seine, on Friday, the 25th of last mont xcites, the court-room was as full as it could possibly be. The proceedings were opened by M. Legrand, acout for Mrs. Elizabeth Patterson, presenting the following conclusions: "That it may please the Tribunal to declare the marriage contracted on the 24th of December, 1803, between the late Prince Jerome and Elizabeth Patterson valid.
And also to take judicial cognizance (donner acte) that M. Bonaparte, while demanding that the marriage of the 24th of December,1803, may be declared valid, h nning his case." He rests his case entirely upon the law of France, at the time, of the provisions of which, he says, Miss Patterson was well aware, when she said, "If I can be his wife for an hour I will run the risk;" and that, knowing the legal ob
M. Berryer (search for this): article 5
M. Allon (search for this): article 5
25 AD (search for this): article 5
The Bonaparte suit.
--By the New York's mails we have further particulars of the great case of Patterson.
vs. Bonaparte, which was opened at Paris, before the First Chambers of the Civil Tribunal of the Seine, on Friday, the 25th of last month, as our readers are aware from what has already appeared in the Herald.
From the very natural curiosity which the case excites, the court-room was as full as it could possibly be. The proceedings were opened by M. Legrand, acout for Mrs. Elizabeth Patterson, presenting the following conclusions: "That it may please the Tribunal to declare the marriage contracted on the 24th of December, 1803, between the late Prince Jerome and Elizabeth Patterson valid.
And also to take judicial cognizance (donner acte) that M. Bonaparte, while demanding that the marriage of the 24th of December,1803, may be declared valid, has never had any intention, to contest, and does not now contest, the civil and political effects of the union contracted in 1807
December 24th, 1803 AD (search for this): article 5