hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
Abraham Lincoln 30 0 Browse Search
Norfolk (Virginia, United States) 24 0 Browse Search
France (France) 24 0 Browse Search
House 20 0 Browse Search
United States (United States) 20 0 Browse Search
E. C. Brown 14 0 Browse Search
Virginia (Virginia, United States) 12 0 Browse Search
Maryland (Maryland, United States) 12 0 Browse Search
Fort Taylor (Texas, United States) 10 0 Browse Search
Fort Pickens (Florida, United States) 10 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: March 15, 1861., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 9 total hits in 4 results.

France (France) (search for this): article 13
M'Me Paterson's Caution. --An incident in connection with the Bonaparte-Paterson trial has excited some remark in Paris. Mme. Paterson, coming to France, did not bring with her all the papers which sustained her case, for fear they might be stolen. Some she left behind; while those she brought she had sewed into garments which never quitted her person. This indirect imputation upon the honor of her opponents and the French police, excited a sentiment of indignation which has found expression in various ways. Even her lawyer, M. Berryer, spoke of the apprehensions of his clients as illusory and ill-founded, while the defence made use of the fact to throw doubt upon the authenticity of the certified duplicates presented to the Court.
Manchester (New Jersey, United States) (search for this): article 13
M'Me Paterson's Caution. --An incident in connection with the Bonaparte-Paterson trial has excited some remark in Paris. Mme. Paterson, coming to France, did not bring with her all the papers which sustained her case, for fear they might be stolen. Some she left behind; while those she brought she had sewed into garments which never quitted her person. This indirect imputation upon the honor of her opponents and the French police, excited a sentiment of indignation which has found expression in various ways. Even her lawyer, M. Berryer, spoke of the apprehensions of his clients as illusory and ill-founded, while the defence made use of the fact to throw doubt upon the authenticity of the certified duplicates presented to the Court.
M'Me Paterson's Caution. --An incident in connection with the Bonaparte-Paterson trial has excited some remark in Paris. Mme. Paterson, coming to France, did not bring with her all the papers which sustained her case, for fear they might be stolen. Some she left behind; while those she brought she had sewed into garments which never quitted her person. This indirect imputation upon the honor of her opponents and the French police, excited a sentiment of indignation which has found expreMme. Paterson, coming to France, did not bring with her all the papers which sustained her case, for fear they might be stolen. Some she left behind; while those she brought she had sewed into garments which never quitted her person. This indirect imputation upon the honor of her opponents and the French police, excited a sentiment of indignation which has found expression in various ways. Even her lawyer, M. Berryer, spoke of the apprehensions of his clients as illusory and ill-founded, while the defence made use of the fact to throw doubt upon the authenticity of the certified duplicates presented to the Court.
M. Berryer (search for this): article 13
M'Me Paterson's Caution. --An incident in connection with the Bonaparte-Paterson trial has excited some remark in Paris. Mme. Paterson, coming to France, did not bring with her all the papers which sustained her case, for fear they might be stolen. Some she left behind; while those she brought she had sewed into garments which never quitted her person. This indirect imputation upon the honor of her opponents and the French police, excited a sentiment of indignation which has found expression in various ways. Even her lawyer, M. Berryer, spoke of the apprehensions of his clients as illusory and ill-founded, while the defence made use of the fact to throw doubt upon the authenticity of the certified duplicates presented to the Court.