hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
United States (United States) 56 0 Browse Search
Vienna (Virginia, United States) 40 0 Browse Search
Picayune Butler 28 0 Browse Search
Abraham Lincoln 20 0 Browse Search
France (France) 16 0 Browse Search
Maryland (Maryland, United States) 16 0 Browse Search
June 19th 15 15 Browse Search
Cadwallader 14 4 Browse Search
Sewell's Point (Virginia, United States) 14 0 Browse Search
Sampson Jordan 14 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: June 24, 1861., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 20 total hits in 4 results.

France (France) (search for this): article 18
Le Monde, the leading Catholic journal in France, in noticing the present war, says: England has already decided that she will maintain a neutral position and consider the war as one between two sovereign powers — In France it has been asked whether the Southern States were not rebels? It is difficult to admit this interpretation, when we reflect that the United States form a federation.--Sovereignty belongs to each State. The Union is a contract, a treaty; and when violated, eithFrance it has been asked whether the Southern States were not rebels? It is difficult to admit this interpretation, when we reflect that the United States form a federation.--Sovereignty belongs to each State. The Union is a contract, a treaty; and when violated, either with or without a cause, it is and can be only a violation of the agreement entered into. It is not a rebellion; it is a war between sovereign States. The question in relation to letters of marque issued by the President of the Southern Confederacy is thus settled. Indeed, it is the only means of defence at sea which the South has against the North. States without a navy or with a weak one, can thus defend themselves against maritime aggression. This Congress of Paris endeavoured
United States (United States) (search for this): article 18
whether the Southern States were not rebels? It is difficult to admit this interpretation, when we reflect that the United States form a federation.--Sovereignty belongs to each State. The Union is a contract, a treaty; and when violated, either ainst maritime aggression. This Congress of Paris endeavoured to set aside this long established principle. The United States did not yield its consent to the decisions had upon that subject. Strange to say. European diplomatists had completef maritime war. Through humanity the rights of private property were respected both at sea and on land. The United States, having no navy, could not recognize a principle which gave them no hold upon the enemy's commerce, while theirs woulas pirates, the prisoners of war from the North may be regarded as brigands, and shot. The French editors of Le Monde (says the N. O. Catholic Standard) are much better informed than the Irish editors of Catholic papers in the United States.
Jefferson Davis (search for this): article 18
ield its consent to the decisions had upon that subject. Strange to say. European diplomatists had completely misunderstood this question; and impelled by a spirit of philanthropy, they were depriving weak States of their only means of defence in cases of maritime war. Through humanity the rights of private property were respected both at sea and on land. The United States, having no navy, could not recognize a principle which gave them no hold upon the enemy's commerce, while theirs would have been exposed to total destruction. The right of the Southern Confederation is incontestable. President Lincoln has promised to hang the corsairs of President Davis. This is simply nonsense. If the corsairs of the South are treated as pirates, the prisoners of war from the North may be regarded as brigands, and shot. The French editors of Le Monde (says the N. O. Catholic Standard) are much better informed than the Irish editors of Catholic papers in the United States.
Abraham Lincoln (search for this): article 18
ield its consent to the decisions had upon that subject. Strange to say. European diplomatists had completely misunderstood this question; and impelled by a spirit of philanthropy, they were depriving weak States of their only means of defence in cases of maritime war. Through humanity the rights of private property were respected both at sea and on land. The United States, having no navy, could not recognize a principle which gave them no hold upon the enemy's commerce, while theirs would have been exposed to total destruction. The right of the Southern Confederation is incontestable. President Lincoln has promised to hang the corsairs of President Davis. This is simply nonsense. If the corsairs of the South are treated as pirates, the prisoners of war from the North may be regarded as brigands, and shot. The French editors of Le Monde (says the N. O. Catholic Standard) are much better informed than the Irish editors of Catholic papers in the United States.