hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity (current method)
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
United States (United States) 30 0 Browse Search
Jos E. Johnston 25 1 Browse Search
Beauregard 23 13 Browse Search
North Carolina (North Carolina, United States) 22 0 Browse Search
Virginia (Virginia, United States) 18 0 Browse Search
Gen Fremont 16 0 Browse Search
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) 14 0 Browse Search
Fortress Monroe (Virginia, United States) 12 0 Browse Search
Canada (Canada) 12 0 Browse Search
Craney Island (Virginia, United States) 10 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: October 26, 1861., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 73 total hits in 13 results.

1 2
January (search for this): article 5
ed officer of the Government was silent, though Congress was in session, and certainly not indisposed liberally to entertain any recommendation from the Administration; and now, within six weeks of the next meeting of the same loyal and patriotic body, an appeal is made to the Governors of States to commence and expedite the work of fortification, when it is notorious that the majority of the Legislatures of those States, who alone can take any movements in that direction, do not meet until January, a month after Congress has assembled. Either the danger of disturbance to our present peaceful relations with foreign Powers, instead of being diminished, is really " more serious than it has been at any previous period during the course of insurrection," or that gentleman has written an untimely and injudicious circular. We have called it alarm-creating. One inevitable effect of it we judge will be, that it will disturb and depress the money market, cause a rapid decline in stocks, and
October 17th (search for this): article 5
y prudent that we should be prepared to defend ourselves under any circumstances which may happen. Being prepared to maintain our rights, there will be less liability that they will be disregarded so as to force us into collision. Boston, Oct. 17.--Secretary Seward's circular attracts no special attention, but its suggestions in favor of State action for coast defences meet with general approval. The circular had no perceptible effect on stocks or the money market to-day. Buffalo, N. Y., Oct. 17.--The Express (Rep.) says:--"Mr. Seward's circular has taken the country by surprise, and will be likely to occasion much anxiety lest there may be in the secrets of the Department a knowledge of real danger. If, in response to the armaments England has sent to Canada, our frontier should bristle with guns and be put in a position for either offence or defence, we are inclined to believe that the consequence would be as Mr. Seward suggests, pacificatory." The Courier (Democr
Mason (search for this): article 5
recommending the Governors of the Northern States to provide for the defence of their frontiers and seacoast, has created an intense feeling at the North, where it seems to be considered a diplomatic puzzle, intended for some supposed important object which the political editors cannot yet determine. It would seem, however, from the tenor of their articles, copious extracts from which we give below, that it is supposed the circular is to counteract any influence that our Commissioners, Messrs. Mason and Slidell, may exert in Europe, should they safely arrive there. The New York Express, however, sees nothing in it but a preparation reasonably called for by the menacing attitude of England, and says: Mr. Seward's admonition to England, and other powers, for we presume from its publication, it is rather an admonition than an address to Gov. Morgan, is well, very well; but we must not consent ourselves in receiving it only as a foreign admonition, but prepare for it here at home
Morgan (search for this): article 5
copious extracts from which we give below, that it is supposed the circular is to counteract any influence that our Commissioners, Messrs. Mason and Slidell, may exert in Europe, should they safely arrive there. The New York Express, however, sees nothing in it but a preparation reasonably called for by the menacing attitude of England, and says: Mr. Seward's admonition to England, and other powers, for we presume from its publication, it is rather an admonition than an address to Gov. Morgan, is well, very well; but we must not consent ourselves in receiving it only as a foreign admonition, but prepare for it here at home, in fortifying and arming. The whole militia system of this State should be remodeled the moment the Legislature assembles. Every man in the State, from 18 to 45, should be brought under arms, for we know not what day the British red coats in Canada may be pitched in upon us. But there are offensive steps to be taken as well as defensive. Our reciprocally
Seward (search for this): article 5
Mr. Seward's fortification circular — its effect at the North--Opinions of the Press. The promulgation of the circular of Secretary Seward, recommending the Governors of the Northern States to providthe menacing attitude of England, and says: Mr. Seward's admonition to England, and other powers, for wet loan. This so experienced a public man as Mr. Secretary Seward ought to have foreseen, and to have avoided,d in the street than this one, as the circular of Mr. Seward, although ill-timed and unnecessary, contains notrs and sea-coasts." The Ledger says that as Mr. Seward has been noted during the present troubles for hirce us into collision. Boston, Oct. 17.--Secretary Seward's circular attracts no special attention, but falo, N. Y., Oct. 17.--The Express (Rep.) says:--"Mr. Seward's circular has taken the country by surprise, andlined to believe that the consequence would be as Mr. Seward suggests, pacificatory." The Courier (Democr
Sewardle (search for this): article 5
conquest which Spain may make. It is idle to say we have no interests to be protected there, and that we cannot afford to waste our strength in fighting the battles of other nations. We shall be fighting our own battle most effectually in defending Mexico against European conquest. Our prestige and national honor are involved in resisting such an effort to plant a hostile flag upon our weakest and most exposed frontier. We presume it is against possible dangers from this quarter that Mr. Sewardle precaution is directed. France and England may possibly join Spain in her endeavors, or they may so far encourage her as to involve themselves in complications with our blockade. For any emergency, it is clearly the duty of our people to be fully prepared. The following, from the Philadelphia Bulletin (Rep.) shows that journal thinks the "admonition" is meant for England: "The fact that the British Government is sending an unusual force to Canada, makes it necessary that the
Slidell (search for this): article 5
he Governors of the Northern States to provide for the defence of their frontiers and seacoast, has created an intense feeling at the North, where it seems to be considered a diplomatic puzzle, intended for some supposed important object which the political editors cannot yet determine. It would seem, however, from the tenor of their articles, copious extracts from which we give below, that it is supposed the circular is to counteract any influence that our Commissioners, Messrs. Mason and Slidell, may exert in Europe, should they safely arrive there. The New York Express, however, sees nothing in it but a preparation reasonably called for by the menacing attitude of England, and says: Mr. Seward's admonition to England, and other powers, for we presume from its publication, it is rather an admonition than an address to Gov. Morgan, is well, very well; but we must not consent ourselves in receiving it only as a foreign admonition, but prepare for it here at home, in fortifying
France (France) (search for this): article 5
nd since the war, has never disguised its apprehensions that we were to have serious trouble with Great Britain, and with France, too, if we did not diplomatize, and give France business favors at the cost of Great Britain. The feeling against GreatFrance business favors at the cost of Great Britain. The feeling against Great Britain, indeed, in this country, is becoming so strong, that hundreds of us, who denounced the Morrill tariff as a barbarism in trade, rather rejoice in it now, and wish it was an embargo on British importations rather than a tariff. If the Morrildetermined to see under the thin veil of the well-turned sentences of the Secretary that he anticipated a war with either France or England, and desired our coast to be prepared for it. The Times believes that the threatening troubles hinted atexposed frontier. We presume it is against possible dangers from this quarter that Mr. Sewardle precaution is directed. France and England may possibly join Spain in her endeavors, or they may so far encourage her as to involve themselves in compli
Mexico (Mexico, Mexico) (search for this): article 5
ast to be prepared for it. The Times believes that the threatening troubles hinted at in the circular may grow out of the proposed European movement against Mexico, and remarks: We have very little doubt that our Government is prepared to extend the utmost aid to Mexico in her extremity, and to offer armed resistance, iMexico in her extremity, and to offer armed resistance, if necessary, against the attempts at invasion and conquest which Spain may make. It is idle to say we have no interests to be protected there, and that we cannot afford to waste our strength in fighting the battles of other nations. We shall be fighting our own battle most effectually in defending Mexico against European conquesMexico against European conquest. Our prestige and national honor are involved in resisting such an effort to plant a hostile flag upon our weakest and most exposed frontier. We presume it is against possible dangers from this quarter that Mr. Sewardle precaution is directed. France and England may possibly join Spain in her endeavors, or they may so far enc
England (United Kingdom) (search for this): article 5
that can re-tread in safety the soil of Ireland, let them go, as commissioners, and touch the Irish heart once more. Great Britain is giving us every reason to excite, wherever we can, sentiment, passion, wrath, against the Administration of the Brss, before the war and since the war, has never disguised its apprehensions that we were to have serious trouble with Great Britain, and with France, too, if we did not diplomatize, and give France business favors at the cost of Great Britain. The Great Britain. The feeling against Great Britain, indeed, in this country, is becoming so strong, that hundreds of us, who denounced the Morrill tariff as a barbarism in trade, rather rejoice in it now, and wish it was an embargo on British importations rather than a Great Britain, indeed, in this country, is becoming so strong, that hundreds of us, who denounced the Morrill tariff as a barbarism in trade, rather rejoice in it now, and wish it was an embargo on British importations rather than a tariff. If the Morrill tariff did not exist, associations would soon be forming to touch not, taste not British manufactured goods. The New York Commercial (Rep.) takes the Secretary severely to task for issuing the circular. It says: T
1 2