hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
Hilton Head (South Carolina, United States) 36 0 Browse Search
James P. Holcombe 24 0 Browse Search
United States (United States) 24 0 Browse Search
Maryland (Maryland, United States) 22 0 Browse Search
Beaufort, S. C. (South Carolina, United States) 22 0 Browse Search
South Carolina (South Carolina, United States) 20 0 Browse Search
New Bern (North Carolina, United States) 17 1 Browse Search
R. G. H. Kean 16 0 Browse Search
D. D. Sirmond 15 1 Browse Search
Port Royal (South Carolina, United States) 14 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: November 12, 1861., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 32 total hits in 10 results.

Paraje (New Mexico, United States) (search for this): article 8
Rumored attack upon Fort Craig. --The Houston Telegraph learns that an express from San Antonio to Col. Ford, at Fort Brown, reports that Col. Baylor attacked Fort Craig with seven hundred men, the Federal forces being eleven companies, and the Confederates were repulsed with a loss of three hundred, and that the San AntonioFort Craig with seven hundred men, the Federal forces being eleven companies, and the Confederates were repulsed with a loss of three hundred, and that the San Antonio papers were forbidden to publish it. The same messenger told them that kit Carson was raising 5000 men in New Mexico to invade Texas. The above appeared in the Southwestern yesterday morning and created no little excitement in some who perused it. Our contemporary, as will be seen, is not responsible for it, as the particulaur city yesterday, informs us that he is just from that point, and that there is no truth in the dispatch. He says that Baylor is encamped immediately opposite Fort Craig, with the hopes of starving them out, as it is impossible to attack them with his present force without being defeated. Baylor does not intend to venture an at
Shreveport (Louisiana, United States) (search for this): article 8
he above appeared in the Southwestern yesterday morning and created no little excitement in some who perused it. Our contemporary, as will be seen, is not responsible for it, as the particulars were gleaned from the Houston Telegraph. A gentleman who arrived in our city yesterday, informs us that he is just from that point, and that there is no truth in the dispatch. He says that Baylor is encamped immediately opposite Fort Craig, with the hopes of starving them out, as it is impossible to attack them with his present force without being defeated. Baylor does not intend to venture an attack. Our informant tells us that they had an engagement at Fort Fillmore, and the Confederates took eighty-four prisoners; the particulars of the killed and wounded he was not positive about, but from what he saw, thinks we had twelve killed. Regarding Kit Carson, he reports him as being a Lieutenant under Baylor, in the service of the Confederate States.--Shreveport (La.) News, 31st ult.
San Antonio (Texas, United States) (search for this): article 8
Rumored attack upon Fort Craig. --The Houston Telegraph learns that an express from San Antonio to Col. Ford, at Fort Brown, reports that Col. Baylor attacked Fort Craig with seven hundred men, the Federal forces being eleven companies, and the Confederates were repulsed with a loss of three hundred, and that the San Antonio papers were forbidden to publish it. The same messenger told them that kit Carson was raising 5000 men in New Mexico to invade Texas. The above appeared in the Southwestern yesterday morning and created no little excitement in some who perused it. Our contemporary, as will be seen, is not responsible for it, as the particulars were gleaned from the Houston Telegraph. A gentleman who arrived in our city yesterday, informs us that he is just from that point, and that there is no truth in the dispatch. He says that Baylor is encamped immediately opposite Fort Craig, with the hopes of starving them out, as it is impossible to attack them with his pres
United States (United States) (search for this): article 8
he above appeared in the Southwestern yesterday morning and created no little excitement in some who perused it. Our contemporary, as will be seen, is not responsible for it, as the particulars were gleaned from the Houston Telegraph. A gentleman who arrived in our city yesterday, informs us that he is just from that point, and that there is no truth in the dispatch. He says that Baylor is encamped immediately opposite Fort Craig, with the hopes of starving them out, as it is impossible to attack them with his present force without being defeated. Baylor does not intend to venture an attack. Our informant tells us that they had an engagement at Fort Fillmore, and the Confederates took eighty-four prisoners; the particulars of the killed and wounded he was not positive about, but from what he saw, thinks we had twelve killed. Regarding Kit Carson, he reports him as being a Lieutenant under Baylor, in the service of the Confederate States.--Shreveport (La.) News, 31st ult.
Fort Taylor (Texas, United States) (search for this): article 8
Rumored attack upon Fort Craig. --The Houston Telegraph learns that an express from San Antonio to Col. Ford, at Fort Brown, reports that Col. Baylor attacked Fort Craig with seven hundred men, the Federal forces being eleven companies, and the Confederates were repulsed with a loss of three hundred, and that the San Antonio papers were forbidden to publish it. The same messenger told them that kit Carson was raising 5000 men in New Mexico to invade Texas. The above appeared in the Southwestern yesterday morning and created no little excitement in some who perused it. Our contemporary, as will be seen, is not responsible for it, as the particulars were gleaned from the Houston Telegraph. A gentleman who arrived in our city yesterday, informs us that he is just from that point, and that there is no truth in the dispatch. He says that Baylor is encamped immediately opposite Fort Craig, with the hopes of starving them out, as it is impossible to attack them with his prese
Las Cruces (New Mexico, United States) (search for this): article 8
e above appeared in the Southwestern yesterday morning and created no little excitement in some who perused it. Our contemporary, as will be seen, is not responsible for it, as the particulars were gleaned from the Houston Telegraph. A gentleman who arrived in our city yesterday, informs us that he is just from that point, and that there is no truth in the dispatch. He says that Baylor is encamped immediately opposite Fort Craig, with the hopes of starving them out, as it is impossible to attack them with his present force without being defeated. Baylor does not intend to venture an attack. Our informant tells us that they had an engagement at Fort Fillmore, and the Confederates took eighty-four prisoners; the particulars of the killed and wounded he was not positive about, but from what he saw, thinks we had twelve killed. Regarding Kit Carson, he reports him as being a Lieutenant under Baylor, in the service of the Confederate States.--Shreveport (La.) News, 31st ult.
S. H. Ford (search for this): article 8
Rumored attack upon Fort Craig. --The Houston Telegraph learns that an express from San Antonio to Col. Ford, at Fort Brown, reports that Col. Baylor attacked Fort Craig with seven hundred men, the Federal forces being eleven companies, and the Confederates were repulsed with a loss of three hundred, and that the San Antonio papers were forbidden to publish it. The same messenger told them that kit Carson was raising 5000 men in New Mexico to invade Texas. The above appeared in the Southwestern yesterday morning and created no little excitement in some who perused it. Our contemporary, as will be seen, is not responsible for it, as the particulars were gleaned from the Houston Telegraph. A gentleman who arrived in our city yesterday, informs us that he is just from that point, and that there is no truth in the dispatch. He says that Baylor is encamped immediately opposite Fort Craig, with the hopes of starving them out, as it is impossible to attack them with his pres
Baylor (search for this): article 8
t Craig. --The Houston Telegraph learns that an express from San Antonio to Col. Ford, at Fort Brown, reports that Col. Baylor attacked Fort Craig with seven hundred men, the Federal forces being eleven companies, and the Confederates were repulour city yesterday, informs us that he is just from that point, and that there is no truth in the dispatch. He says that Baylor is encamped immediately opposite Fort Craig, with the hopes of starving them out, as it is impossible to attack them with his present force without being defeated. Baylor does not intend to venture an attack. Our informant tells us that they had an engagement at Fort Fillmore, and the Confederates took eighty-four prisoners; the particulars of the killed and wounded lled and wounded he was not positive about, but from what he saw, thinks we had twelve killed. Regarding Kit Carson, he reports him as being a Lieutenant under Baylor, in the service of the Confederate States.--Shreveport (La.) News, 31st ult.
Kit Carson (search for this): article 8
ked Fort Craig with seven hundred men, the Federal forces being eleven companies, and the Confederates were repulsed with a loss of three hundred, and that the San Antonio papers were forbidden to publish it. The same messenger told them that kit Carson was raising 5000 men in New Mexico to invade Texas. The above appeared in the Southwestern yesterday morning and created no little excitement in some who perused it. Our contemporary, as will be seen, is not responsible for it, as the partic attack them with his present force without being defeated. Baylor does not intend to venture an attack. Our informant tells us that they had an engagement at Fort Fillmore, and the Confederates took eighty-four prisoners; the particulars of the killed and wounded he was not positive about, but from what he saw, thinks we had twelve killed. Regarding Kit Carson, he reports him as being a Lieutenant under Baylor, in the service of the Confederate States.--Shreveport (La.) News, 31st ult.
31st (search for this): article 8
e above appeared in the Southwestern yesterday morning and created no little excitement in some who perused it. Our contemporary, as will be seen, is not responsible for it, as the particulars were gleaned from the Houston Telegraph. A gentleman who arrived in our city yesterday, informs us that he is just from that point, and that there is no truth in the dispatch. He says that Baylor is encamped immediately opposite Fort Craig, with the hopes of starving them out, as it is impossible to attack them with his present force without being defeated. Baylor does not intend to venture an attack. Our informant tells us that they had an engagement at Fort Fillmore, and the Confederates took eighty-four prisoners; the particulars of the killed and wounded he was not positive about, but from what he saw, thinks we had twelve killed. Regarding Kit Carson, he reports him as being a Lieutenant under Baylor, in the service of the Confederate States.--Shreveport (La.) News, 31st ult.