hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
United States (United States) 50 0 Browse Search
France (France) 28 0 Browse Search
Mexico (Mexico, Mexico) 22 0 Browse Search
Mexico, Mo. (Missouri, United States) 16 0 Browse Search
Gen Zollicoffer 14 0 Browse Search
Abraham Lincoln 14 0 Browse Search
Gen Price 14 0 Browse Search
Kanawha (West Virginia, United States) 14 0 Browse Search
Slidell 12 0 Browse Search
Charlotte (North Carolina, United States) 12 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: December 12, 1861., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 165 total hits in 26 results.

1 2 3
England (United Kingdom) (search for this): article 8
Majesty, the Queen of Spain, and the Emperor of the French, Relative to combined operations against Mexico. Her Majesty the Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, her Majesty the Queen of Spain, and his Majesty the Emperor of the French, feeling themselves compelled, by the arbitrary and vexatious conduct of combine their common action, and for this purpose, have named as their Plenipotentiaries, that is to say: Her Majesty the Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, the Right Hon. John Earl Russell, Viscount Amberly, of Amberly and Ardsalla, a Peer of the United Kingdom, a member of her Britannic Majesty's Prieir respective full powers, found in good and due form, have agreed upon the following articles: Article 1. Her Majesty the Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, her Majesty the Queen of Spain, and his Majesty the Emperor of the French, engage to make, immediately after the signature of the present conventi
Mexico (Mexico, Mexico) (search for this): article 8
ects in view than the settlement of their outstanding accounts with Mexico, and the protection of their commerce against our rebel privateers, power of the United States, overshadowing Canada on the North, and Mexico and the States of the Gulf on the South, so clearly arrogated to it joint expedition for the purpose of demanding from the Republic of Mexico more efficacious protection for the persons and properties of their very limited resources of which the authorities of the Republic of Mexico can dispose, the chronic anarchy which has so long wasted that unhaon behalf of the United States, that we have no right to claim that Mexico should treat us better than she treats herself, we should be withouo extreme that we cannot consent to be judged by such a criterion. Mexico has treated us as ill as she treats her own citizens, and what worsmething more than the privileges of the most favored nation; for in Mexico all who come in contact with her bands of remorseless robbers are p
United States (United States) (search for this): article 8
cter, and being aware that the Government of the United States, on its part, has, like them, claims to enforce f shall be communicated to the Government of the United States; that Government shall be invited to accede to ienipotentiary designated by the President of the United States, a convention identic, save the suppression of tobtaining the accession of the Government of the United States, the commencement of the above mentioned operatihe balance of the new. The colossal power of the United States, overshadowing Canada on the North, and Mexico aly the principle which is urged on behalf of the United States, that we have no right to claim that Mexico shourvention, without seeking the approbation of the United States. It is true that the convention reserves to the United States the liberty of joining with the three European Powers, and that a sort of apology is offered forolidated in support of their foreign policy, the United States occupy a less important position than in the day
North America (search for this): article 8
rol the destinies of the world. She must also feel a peculiar pleasure in beholding the position of the colony which thing off its allegiance to her forty years ago, and comparing it with her own: The Spanish nation seems about to renew its youth, while the apparently vigorous and prosperous colony has fallen into more than senile decrepitude. The States of the American Union, on the other hand, cannot but view the presence of the troops of France, England and Spain on the continent of North America with feelings of mortification and distrust. England, so long lectured with the Monroe doctrine, and Spain, whose fairest possessions in the New World America has so long socked on as about to become her own, have announced their intention of doing themselves justice by an armed intervention, without seeking the approbation of the United States. It is true that the convention reserves to the United States the liberty of joining with the three European Powers, and that a sort of apology
Mexico, Mo. (Missouri, United States) (search for this): article 8
The expedition against Mexico. the Mexican convention between England, France and Spain--sentiments of the London p The following in relation to the gaeat expedition against Mexico our readers will find of a very interesting character: ror of the French, Relative to combined operations against Mexico. Her Majesty the Queen of the United Kingdom of Great nd vexatious conduct of the authorities of the republic of Mexico, to demand from those authorities more efficacious protections contracted towards their Majesties by the republic of Mexico, have agreed to conclude a convention, with a view to combhe necessary arrangements for dispatching to the coasts of Mexico combined naval and military forces, the strength of which advantage, and not to exercise in the internal affairs of Mexico any influence of a nature to prejudice the right of the Metribution of the sums of money which may be recovered from Mexico, having regard to the respective rights of the three contr
Madrid (Spain) (search for this): article 8
ave determined on raising the Southern blockade, they need only have united their forces on the West India stations, and ordered them upon that service. It was surely not necessary to take the roundabout course of concluding a Convention with Spain, and enlisting the aid of that country in an undertaking in which she could have no direct concern. The closing of the Southern ports is of no great consequence to Spain. Her commerce is but slightly affected by the blockade, and the Cabinet of Madrid would most assuredly never incur the cost and trouble of equipping an expedition to give a coloring to the designs of France and England. The Mexican expedition is obviously not directed against the Southern blockade, though we can understand why the Northern press should assert that it is. If the blockade was really efficient, if the Federal Government had at their command a force sufficient to interdict commerce, in conformity with the received maxims of international law, we should hear
Mexico (Mexico) (search for this): article 8
hault. How the expedition may Affect our blockade. [From the London Shipping Gazette, Nov.19.] The expeditionary force which will shortly he assembled in Mexican waters; under the flags of England, France, and Spain, has naturally attracted great attention, especially in the Northern States, and has furnished the occasion exico, and the protection of their commerce against our rebel privateers, and against the accidents of our Southern blockade." It was not to be supposed that this Mexican expedition could have been organized and set on foot without exciting the suspicions of the North, and yet there is no prospect whatever that the triple alliance e Cabinet of Madrid would most assuredly never incur the cost and trouble of equipping an expedition to give a coloring to the designs of France and England. The Mexican expedition is obviously not directed against the Southern blockade, though we can understand why the Northern press should assert that it is. If the blockade was
West Indies (search for this): article 8
and against the accidents of our Southern blockade." It was not to be supposed that this Mexican expedition could have been organized and set on foot without exciting the suspicions of the North, and yet there is no prospect whatever that the triple alliance just concluded will be directed towards an interference between the American belligerents. If France or England, or both powers combined, have determined on raising the Southern blockade, they need only have united their forces on the West India stations, and ordered them upon that service. It was surely not necessary to take the roundabout course of concluding a Convention with Spain, and enlisting the aid of that country in an undertaking in which she could have no direct concern. The closing of the Southern ports is of no great consequence to Spain. Her commerce is but slightly affected by the blockade, and the Cabinet of Madrid would most assuredly never incur the cost and trouble of equipping an expedition to give a colori
Gulf of Mexico (search for this): article 8
ve steamers, mounting 800 guns, and the French Admiral, Jurien de Grayiere, probably a squadron of ten sail and 310 guns. The assemblage of this force in the Gulf of Mexico, while the Federal squadron is laboring to effect a blockade, the inefficiency of which has been demonstrated in numberless instances, and the recognition of hat they are maintaining a blockade on sufferance, and embarrassing commerce through the forbearance of the neutral Powers, that they fear the presence in the Gulf of Mexico of a combined fleet belonging to those Powers. The Federal Government may rest satisfied on this point. Whatever the want of this country, or of France, of inion in the North, or to Spanish intervention in the South." This, however, is perfectly consistent with the innocuous presence of the combined fleets in the Gulf of Mexico, and with the solution of the question to which the expeditionary force is subordinate. That question has nothing whatever to do with the existing troubles i
Portugal (Portugal) (search for this): article 8
Viscount Amberly, of Amberly and Ardsalla, a Peer of the United Kingdom, a member of her Britannic Majesty's Privy Council, her Majesty's Principal Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs; Her Majesty the Queen of Spain, Don Xavier de Isturizy Montero, Knight of the Illustrious Order of the Golden Fleece, Grand Cross of the Royal and Distinguished Order of Charles III., of the Imperial Order of the Legion of Honor of France, of the Orders of the Conception of Villaviciosa and Christ of Portugal, Senator of the Kingdom, late President of the Council of Ministers, and First Secretary of State of her Catholic Majesty, and her Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary to her Britannic Majesty; And his Majesty the Emperor of the French, his Excellency the Count de Flahault de la Billarderie, Senator, General of Division, Grand Cross of the Legion of Honor, his Imperial Majesty's Ambassador Extraordinary to her Britannic Majesty; Who, after having reciprocally communic
1 2 3