hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
McClellan 28 4 Browse Search
Gallatin, Tenn. (Tennessee, United States) 15 1 Browse Search
Richmond (Virginia, United States) 10 0 Browse Search
Stone 10 0 Browse Search
Fortress Monroe (Virginia, United States) 8 0 Browse Search
South Carolina (South Carolina, United States) 8 0 Browse Search
Virginia (Virginia, United States) 8 0 Browse Search
John Hugh Smith 8 0 Browse Search
Pope 7 1 Browse Search
Morgan 7 1 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: August 28, 1862., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 37 total hits in 18 results.

1 2
Missouri (Missouri, United States) (search for this): article 7
milies away from the overrun district, and to look for proper homes, and make the proper provision for those of whom they have the care. Mr. Orr, of S. C., opposed the amendment, because it would amount to the exemption of all who came from Missouri, Kentucky, West Tennessee, and Northwestern Virginia. These were the every men who ought not to be exempted. Mr. Simms, of Ky., was perfectly willing to adopt the amendment, if it would only cover the cases for which it was intended; but wshare its dangers. Mr. Peyton, of Mo, said that it was neither his wish nor the wish of his colleague to exempt a single Missourian. The five thousand Missourians who went into the battle of Corinth were promised that they should return to Missouri. By passing this law this promise would be broken, and every one of them would be conscripted and put into the Confederate service, when they could undoubtedly do more good at home. After an extended debate, in which Messrs. Orr, Wigfall,
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) (search for this): article 7
ricts of country in which the Conscription law cannot be enforced on account of the presence or proximity of the enemy. Mr. Clark thought it was due to refugees from said districts to give them an opportunity to bring their families away from the overrun district, and to look for proper homes, and make the proper provision for those of whom they have the care. Mr. Orr, of S. C., opposed the amendment, because it would amount to the exemption of all who came from Missouri, Kentucky, West Tennessee, and Northwestern Virginia. These were the every men who ought not to be exempted. Mr. Simms, of Ky., was perfectly willing to adopt the amendment, if it would only cover the cases for which it was intended; but was of opinion that the proper mode would be to adopt the original bill leaving it to the discretion of the Secretary of War to give those refugees time to seek out homes for their families who wanted them. For himself he asked no exemption for Kentuckian. If they wished
South Carolina (South Carolina, United States) (search for this): article 7
taken up from the calendar. Mr. Clark, of Mo., moved to amend the bill so as to except persons coming from districts of country in which the Conscription law cannot be enforced on account of the presence or proximity of the enemy. Mr. Clark thought it was due to refugees from said districts to give them an opportunity to bring their families away from the overrun district, and to look for proper homes, and make the proper provision for those of whom they have the care. Mr. Orr, of S. C., opposed the amendment, because it would amount to the exemption of all who came from Missouri, Kentucky, West Tennessee, and Northwestern Virginia. These were the every men who ought not to be exempted. Mr. Simms, of Ky., was perfectly willing to adopt the amendment, if it would only cover the cases for which it was intended; but was of opinion that the proper mode would be to adopt the original bill leaving it to the discretion of the Secretary of War to give those refugees time to s
Meriwether (Georgia, United States) (search for this): article 7
Confederate States Congress.[adjourned Session.]Senate Wednesday, Aug. 27, 1862. The Senate met at 12 o'clock. Prayer by the Right Rev. Bishop Early, of the Methodist-Episcopal Church. Mr. Sparrow, from the Committee on Military Affairs, reported back the memorial of citizens of Meriwether county, Georgia, asking for the exemption of physicians in certain cases, and asked to be and were discharged from the further consideration of the matter. Mr. Oldham, of Texas, offered the following resolution: Resolved, That the President he requested to communicate to the Senate whether Provost Marshals, who are employed as such, are authorized by the Secretary of War to receive the pay of a Captain of the Staff, and to be paid by the Quartermaster's Department; and, further, by what authority said officers are appointed and their pay and allowances fixed. Mr. Oldham said that there were two very important questions involved--first, the authority for appointing such
United States (United States) (search for this): article 7
Confederate States Congress.[adjourned Session.]Senate Wednesday, Aug. 27, 1862. The Senate met at 12 o'clock. Prayer by the Right Rev. Bishop Early, of the Methodist-Episcopal Church. Mr. Sparrow, from the Committee on Military Affairs, reported back the memorial of citizens of Meriwether county, Georgia, asking for the exemption of physicians in certain cases, and asked to be and were discharged from the further consideration of the matter. Mr. Oldham, of Texas, offered the following resolution: Resolved, That the President he requested to communicate to the Senate whether Provost Marshals, who are employed as such, are authorized by the Secretary of War to receive the pay of a Captain of the Staff, and to be paid by the Quartermaster's Department; and, further, by what authority said officers are appointed and their pay and allowances fixed. Mr. Oldham said that there were two very important questions involved--first, the authority for appointing such
Virginia (Virginia, United States) (search for this): article 7
h the Conscription law cannot be enforced on account of the presence or proximity of the enemy. Mr. Clark thought it was due to refugees from said districts to give them an opportunity to bring their families away from the overrun district, and to look for proper homes, and make the proper provision for those of whom they have the care. Mr. Orr, of S. C., opposed the amendment, because it would amount to the exemption of all who came from Missouri, Kentucky, West Tennessee, and Northwestern Virginia. These were the every men who ought not to be exempted. Mr. Simms, of Ky., was perfectly willing to adopt the amendment, if it would only cover the cases for which it was intended; but was of opinion that the proper mode would be to adopt the original bill leaving it to the discretion of the Secretary of War to give those refugees time to seek out homes for their families who wanted them. For himself he asked no exemption for Kentuckian. If they wished to share the liberties
. Clark thought it was due to refugees from said districts to give them an opportunity to bring their families away from the overrun district, and to look for proper homes, and make the proper provision for those of whom they have the care. Mr. Orr, of S. C., opposed the amendment, because it would amount to the exemption of all who came from Missouri, Kentucky, West Tennessee, and Northwestern Virginia. These were the every men who ought not to be exempted. Mr. Simms, of Ky., was ped return to Missouri. By passing this law this promise would be broken, and every one of them would be conscripted and put into the Confederate service, when they could undoubtedly do more good at home. After an extended debate, in which Messrs. Orr, Wigfall, Phelan and Semmes took part, the amendment was put to the vote and reflected. A variety of amendments were offered and discussed at considerable length, and rejected. The further consideration of the bill was postponed, and
Confederate States Congress.[adjourned Session.]Senate Wednesday, Aug. 27, 1862. The Senate met at 12 o'clock. Prayer by the Right Rev. Bishop Early, of the Methodist-Episcopal Church. Mr. Sparrow, from the Committee on Military Affairs, reported back the memorial of citizens of Meriwether county, Georgia, asking for the exemption of physicians in certain cases, and asked to be and were discharged from the further consideration of the matter. Mr. Oldham, of Texas, offered the following resolution: Resolved, That the President he requested to communicate to the Senate whether Provost Marshals, who are employed as such, are authorized by the Secretary of War to receive the pay of a Captain of the Staff, and to be paid by the Quartermaster's Department; and, further, by what authority said officers are appointed and their pay and allowances fixed. Mr. Oldham said that there were two very important questions involved--first, the authority for appointing suc
iscretion of the Secretary of War to give those refugees time to seek out homes for their families who wanted them. For himself he asked no exemption for Kentuckian. If they wished to share the liberties for which we are fighting they must share its dangers. Mr. Peyton, of Mo, said that it was neither his wish nor the wish of his colleague to exempt a single Missourian. The five thousand Missourians who went into the battle of Corinth were promised that they should return to Missouri. By passing this law this promise would be broken, and every one of them would be conscripted and put into the Confederate service, when they could undoubtedly do more good at home. After an extended debate, in which Messrs. Orr, Wigfall, Phelan and Semmes took part, the amendment was put to the vote and reflected. A variety of amendments were offered and discussed at considerable length, and rejected. The further consideration of the bill was postponed, and the Senate adjourned.
He further believed that such resolutions would weaken the efficiency of the army. Mr. Oldham replied at length, and the resolution was finally adopted. The bill amendatory to the Conscription act was taken up from the calendar. Mr. Clark, of Mo., moved to amend the bill so as to except persons coming from districts of country in which the Conscription law cannot be enforced on account of the presence or proximity of the enemy. Mr. Clark thought it was due to refugees from saidMr. Clark thought it was due to refugees from said districts to give them an opportunity to bring their families away from the overrun district, and to look for proper homes, and make the proper provision for those of whom they have the care. Mr. Orr, of S. C., opposed the amendment, because it would amount to the exemption of all who came from Missouri, Kentucky, West Tennessee, and Northwestern Virginia. These were the every men who ought not to be exempted. Mr. Simms, of Ky., was perfectly willing to adopt the amendment, if it wo
1 2