hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
John H. Morgan 30 0 Browse Search
Lee 10 8 Browse Search
Maryland (Maryland, United States) 10 0 Browse Search
South Carolina (South Carolina, United States) 8 0 Browse Search
United States (United States) 8 0 Browse Search
Gallatin, Tenn. (Tennessee, United States) 8 0 Browse Search
Atlanta (Georgia, United States) 7 1 Browse Search
Pope 6 0 Browse Search
France (France) 6 0 Browse Search
Mack 5 1 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: September 13, 1862., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 7 total hits in 5 results.

Richmond (Virginia, United States) (search for this): article 5
dealing with the dead past but with the living present. Suppose it could be demonstrated today beyond all question that the "Southern heart was fired" by Garrison, and Giddings, and Greeley and their disciples, would any sane man regard the absolute demonstration of that fact as a reason why the nation should lay down its arms? Or, if it could be made mathematically certain at once that negro slavery is a moral, political and social evil, would that certainty remove the obstructions in James river, batter down the defences of Richmond, or induce Jeff. Davis to surrender at discretion? If not why should we continue these unprofitable and vexatious discussions? Is there any hope that the war can be adjourned while these and other controverted points in party politics can be referred for settlement to some debating society? Is there not indubitable evidence that the military despotism that sways the South intends to fight until conquered or recognized? Is it not certain as death t
Garrison (search for this): article 5
are the men and such the insignificant and idle subjects which keep up strife among ourselves, which divide the loyal people, which array patriots against each other instead of concentrating their united, moral, and physical strength against the common foe.--And to what end are these discussions continued? The war is upon us. We are not dealing with the dead past but with the living present. Suppose it could be demonstrated today beyond all question that the "Southern heart was fired" by Garrison, and Giddings, and Greeley and their disciples, would any sane man regard the absolute demonstration of that fact as a reason why the nation should lay down its arms? Or, if it could be made mathematically certain at once that negro slavery is a moral, political and social evil, would that certainty remove the obstructions in James river, batter down the defences of Richmond, or induce Jeff. Davis to surrender at discretion? If not why should we continue these unprofitable and vexatious d
Greeley (search for this): article 5
significant and idle subjects which keep up strife among ourselves, which divide the loyal people, which array patriots against each other instead of concentrating their united, moral, and physical strength against the common foe.--And to what end are these discussions continued? The war is upon us. We are not dealing with the dead past but with the living present. Suppose it could be demonstrated today beyond all question that the "Southern heart was fired" by Garrison, and Giddings, and Greeley and their disciples, would any sane man regard the absolute demonstration of that fact as a reason why the nation should lay down its arms? Or, if it could be made mathematically certain at once that negro slavery is a moral, political and social evil, would that certainty remove the obstructions in James river, batter down the defences of Richmond, or induce Jeff. Davis to surrender at discretion? If not why should we continue these unprofitable and vexatious discussions? Is there any h
Giddings (search for this): article 5
nd such the insignificant and idle subjects which keep up strife among ourselves, which divide the loyal people, which array patriots against each other instead of concentrating their united, moral, and physical strength against the common foe.--And to what end are these discussions continued? The war is upon us. We are not dealing with the dead past but with the living present. Suppose it could be demonstrated today beyond all question that the "Southern heart was fired" by Garrison, and Giddings, and Greeley and their disciples, would any sane man regard the absolute demonstration of that fact as a reason why the nation should lay down its arms? Or, if it could be made mathematically certain at once that negro slavery is a moral, political and social evil, would that certainty remove the obstructions in James river, batter down the defences of Richmond, or induce Jeff. Davis to surrender at discretion? If not why should we continue these unprofitable and vexatious discussions? I
Jefferson Davis (search for this): article 5
pose it could be demonstrated today beyond all question that the "Southern heart was fired" by Garrison, and Giddings, and Greeley and their disciples, would any sane man regard the absolute demonstration of that fact as a reason why the nation should lay down its arms? Or, if it could be made mathematically certain at once that negro slavery is a moral, political and social evil, would that certainty remove the obstructions in James river, batter down the defences of Richmond, or induce Jeff. Davis to surrender at discretion? If not why should we continue these unprofitable and vexatious discussions? Is there any hope that the war can be adjourned while these and other controverted points in party politics can be referred for settlement to some debating society? Is there not indubitable evidence that the military despotism that sways the South intends to fight until conquered or recognized? Is it not certain as death that the National Government, backed by an unquestionable and