hide
Named Entity Searches
hide
Sorting
You can sort these results in two ways:
- By entity
- Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
- By position (current method)
- As the entities appear in the document.
You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.
hide
Most Frequent Entities
The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.
Entity | Max. Freq | Min. Freq | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Ashton | 21 | 19 | Browse | Search |
James S. Wadsworth | 20 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Buell | 18 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Bragg | 17 | 7 | Browse | Search |
United States (United States) | 16 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Stuart | 12 | 2 | Browse | Search |
Chambersburg, Pa. (Pennsylvania, United States) | 12 | 0 | Browse | Search |
McClellan | 11 | 7 | Browse | Search |
Lincoln | 11 | 3 | Browse | Search |
Blokets Clement | 11 | 1 | Browse | Search |
View all entities in this document... |
Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: October 18, 1862., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.
Found 29 total hits in 27 results.
Pittsylvania (Virginia, United States) (search for this): article 14
William J. Betterton (search for this): article 14
Sands (search for this): article 14
Proceedings in the courts. Hustings Court, Oct. 17th.
--Present; Richard D. Sanzay, Senior Alderman; Jas. Bray., W. W. Timbericke, Chas, E Anderson and Geo. N. Gwathmeye, Aldermen:
Yesterday was devoted by the Court to the hearing of pleadings on the motion submitted by Messrs, Sands and Nance, to quash the rule leads against Casper Marston and other members of the Richmond Typographical Society, to show stress why an information should not be filed against them for conspiring together as printers to extort of John M. Daniel, proprietor of the paper.
Counsel for defendants concluded that the presentment made against the Parisians and can thrown out of Court by nolle prosequi in the first instance, because of some informality.
The Commonwealth's Attorney could not elect of his commotion to continue the prosecution by information, but must go back and have a new indictment found.
This view of the was opposed by Mr. Gilmer, for the prosecution who rent many authorit
Curtis Pridgeon (search for this): article 14
Casper Marston (search for this): article 14
Proceedings in the courts. Hustings Court, Oct. 17th.
--Present; Richard D. Sanzay, Senior Alderman; Jas. Bray., W. W. Timbericke, Chas, E Anderson and Geo. N. Gwathmeye, Aldermen:
Yesterday was devoted by the Court to the hearing of pleadings on the motion submitted by Messrs, Sands and Nance, to quash the rule leads against Casper Marston and other members of the Richmond Typographical Society, to show stress why an information should not be filed against them for conspiring together as printers to extort of John M. Daniel, proprietor of the paper.
Counsel for defendants concluded that the presentment made against the Parisians and can thrown out of Court by nolle prosequi in the first instance, because of some informality.
The Commonwealth's Attorney could not elect of his commotion to continue the prosecution by information, but must go back and have a new indictment found.
This view of the was opposed by Mr. Gilmer, for the prosecution who rent many authoriti
Andrew Donovan (search for this): article 14
James Bray (search for this): article 14
Proceedings in the courts. Hustings Court, Oct. 17th.
--Present; Richard D. Sanzay, Senior Alderman; Jas. Bray., W. W. Timbericke, Chas, E Anderson and Geo. N. Gwathmeye, Aldermen:
Yesterday was devoted by the Court to the hearing of pleadings on the motion submitted by Messrs, Sands and Nance, to quash the rule leads against Casper Marston and other members of the Richmond Typographical Society, to show stress why an information should not be filed against them for conspiring together as printers to extort of John M. Daniel, proprietor of the paper.
Counsel for defendants concluded that the presentment made against the Parisians and can thrown out of Court by nolle prosequi in the first instance, because of some informality.
The Commonwealth's Attorney could not elect of his commotion to continue the prosecution by information, but must go back and have a new indictment found.
This view of the was opposed by Mr. Gilmer, for the prosecution who rent many authorit
George N. Gwathmeye (search for this): article 14
Proceedings in the courts. Hustings Court, Oct. 17th.
--Present; Richard D. Sanzay, Senior Alderman; Jas. Bray., W. W. Timbericke, Chas, E Anderson and Geo. N. Gwathmeye, Aldermen:
Yesterday was devoted by the Court to the hearing of pleadings on the motion submitted by Messrs, Sands and Nance, to quash the rule leads against Casper Marston and other members of the Richmond Typographical Society, to show stress why an information should not be filed against them for conspiring together as printers to extort of John M. Daniel, proprietor of the paper.
Counsel for defendants concluded that the presentment made against the Parisians and can thrown out of Court by nolle prosequi in the first instance, because of some informality.
The Commonwealth's Attorney could not elect of his commotion to continue the prosecution by information, but must go back and have a new indictment found.
This view of the was opposed by Mr. Gilmer, for the prosecution who rent many authorit
John D. Quarles (search for this): article 14
Nance (search for this): article 14
Proceedings in the courts. Hustings Court, Oct. 17th.
--Present; Richard D. Sanzay, Senior Alderman; Jas. Bray., W. W. Timbericke, Chas, E Anderson and Geo. N. Gwathmeye, Aldermen:
Yesterday was devoted by the Court to the hearing of pleadings on the motion submitted by Messrs, Sands and Nance, to quash the rule leads against Casper Marston and other members of the Richmond Typographical Society, to show stress why an information should not be filed against them for conspiring together as printers to extort of John M. Daniel, proprietor of the paper.
Counsel for defendants concluded that the presentment made against the Parisians and can thrown out of Court by nolle prosequi in the first instance, because of some informality.
The Commonwealth's Attorney could not elect of his commotion to continue the prosecution by information, but must go back and have a new indictment found.
This view of the was opposed by Mr. Gilmer, for the prosecution who rent many authorit