hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
Smith 74 0 Browse Search
Flournoy 58 0 Browse Search
Munford 46 0 Browse Search
Price 45 1 Browse Search
Imboden 41 1 Browse Search
Grant 24 0 Browse Search
John Jackson 20 0 Browse Search
United States (United States) 20 0 Browse Search
D. C. DeJarnette 16 0 Browse Search
Abraham Lincoln 12 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: June 1, 1863., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 10 total hits in 3 results.

United States (United States) (search for this): article 3
scenes. But even on the calculation of selfish interest, England has sorely mistaken her true policy, as she will one day see, in declining to unite with the wise and generous French Emperor in intervening to put an end to this quarrel. The United States would never have dared to resist the combined arms of the two, as is evident from the manner in which she has backed down at the slightest symptom of their displeasure. As it is, France, which offered to intervene, is still respected ihe wise and generous French Emperor in intervening to put an end to this quarrel. The United States would never have dared to resist the combined arms of the two, as is evident from the manner in which she has backed down at the slightest symptom of their displeasure. As it is, France, which offered to intervene, is still respected in both North and South, whilst England has made an implacable enemy of the United States, who will not be slow to seize the first opportunity of revenge.
France (France) (search for this): article 3
, which sometimes had a claim to their consideration. When war degenerates into murder, robbery, and arson; into the banishment of whole populations from their home, and the deliberate organization of servile insurrection, there is or ought to be some rule higher than dollars and cents to govern the action of the civilized spectators of such scenes. But even on the calculation of selfish interest, England has sorely mistaken her true policy, as she will one day see, in declining to unite with the wise and generous French Emperor in intervening to put an end to this quarrel. The United States would never have dared to resist the combined arms of the two, as is evident from the manner in which she has backed down at the slightest symptom of their displeasure. As it is, France, which offered to intervene, is still respected in both North and South, whilst England has made an implacable enemy of the United States, who will not be slow to seize the first opportunity of revenge.
December, 5 AD (search for this): article 3
Inhuman Sentiments. The London Times, of May 12th, says: "No recognition or mediation would have the smallest weight, unless it were backed up by more forcible arguments, and these arguments we are not disposed to apply. We have nothing to do but to wait, and hope that these two unhappy maniac may soon come to themselves and see what they are about." Sentiments more thoroughly heartless than those just quoted have never emanated from any journal. The two combatants are represented as "unhappy maniacs" in the very teeth of the often repeated declaration of the Times that the cause of the South is the cause of constitutional liberty. Does the Times consider it "maniacal" to defend such a cause with all the energy and courage that a nation can summon to the rescue? If English liberty were assailed at its own altars as that of the South is, would not every Englishman rush to arms, and in that event would the Times denounce the whole nation as an "unhappy maniac?" Woul