hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
Sunday Grant 28 0 Browse Search
James Smith 16 0 Browse Search
Samuel Price 14 0 Browse Search
Johnston 12 2 Browse Search
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) 10 0 Browse Search
Henrico C. H. Dejarnette 10 0 Browse Search
Burnside 8 0 Browse Search
Rosecrans 8 0 Browse Search
Stonewall Jackson 8 0 Browse Search
Adams 7 3 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: June 4, 1863., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 4 total hits in 4 results.

Americans (search for this): article 2
secession unless the power of the Washington Government could be made so resistless and overshadowing as to check it.--They threw off all disguise. Their President, elected without a solitary vote in the Southern States, holdly expounded their constitutional dogma by declaring that States were no more to the Federal Government than counties were to the States! He wanted to ignore the States altogether — to cease calling men Virginians, South Carolinians, Georgians, etc., and to call them Americans! The system of Government established by our Revolutionary Fathers — that system which contemplated the independence and sovereignty of the municipalities — the States--as indispensable to public and personal liberty — was discarded and contemned as idle and ridiculous. The Federal Government was everything — the States nothing. To have submitted to his election, his inauguration, and his rule, would have been to accept the Northern political dogma, and to have surrendered the whole
so large a part of the Northern public. It served a purpose — any other which would have answered as well would have been as acceptable. Indeed, slavery the Northern leaders know to be indispensable to the production of the very staples which yielded the great profits to Northern commerce and build up all their wealth. They had no idea of its ultimate extinction. But as a means to agitate the public mind and establish the sectional power they scrupled not to use it. The election of Lincoln was the consummation of the war upon Southern rights and interests. The destruction of State-rights and State sovereignty was indispensable to the maintenance of the sectional tyranny inaugurated by his election. Resistance by the South was a matter of course, unless all semblance of manhood, of national and personal independence, had departed from her people. The war followed resistance. It is not "lamentable." Association with an unscrupulous race, who hesitated not to employ the vil
Washington (search for this): article 2
e was only patched up. The North ever returned to the attack upon the rights and interests of the South with increased energy and increased power. Finally, when the people of the North found that they had at last, through their numbers of voters, the power to carry all the branches of the Government, they hesitated not to usurp them all. They employed the most atrocious means, agitating the most dangerous issues with a duplicity characteristic of them. Drawing that sectional line that General Washington had foretold would dissolve the Union--because he knew that his people never would submit to the tyranny and ignominious rule of a sectional majority — they were ready to follow it up with the assertion of the supreme authority of the Federal Government over all the States as necessary to hold them together — to bind them to the Union. They knew their usurpations would lead to secession unless the power of the Washington Government could be made so resistless and overshadowing as to c
Virginians (search for this): article 2
nd them to the Union. They knew their usurpations would lead to secession unless the power of the Washington Government could be made so resistless and overshadowing as to check it.--They threw off all disguise. Their President, elected without a solitary vote in the Southern States, holdly expounded their constitutional dogma by declaring that States were no more to the Federal Government than counties were to the States! He wanted to ignore the States altogether — to cease calling men Virginians, South Carolinians, Georgians, etc., and to call them Americans! The system of Government established by our Revolutionary Fathers — that system which contemplated the independence and sovereignty of the municipalities — the States--as indispensable to public and personal liberty — was discarded and contemned as idle and ridiculous. The Federal Government was everything — the States nothing. To have submitted to his election, his inauguration, and his rule, would have been to accept