hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in descending order. Sort in ascending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
Gen Hooker 26 0 Browse Search
United States (United States) 24 0 Browse Search
Joe Johnston 15 1 Browse Search
Lee 13 5 Browse Search
Thomas J. Jackson 11 1 Browse Search
Grant 11 1 Browse Search
Milliken's Bend (Louisiana, United States) 10 0 Browse Search
Nassau River (Florida, United States) 8 0 Browse Search
Rosecrans 6 0 Browse Search
City Point (Virginia, United States) 6 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: June 16, 1863., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 15 total hits in 6 results.

Stanton (search for this): article 7
is to end with the present year, or to drag on to the close of President Lincoln's term, or "later." The Daily News says: "The campaign south of the Rappahannock must be added to the list of Federal failures; but, although Gen. Lee announces a great victory, he does not announce that he has pursued a flying enemy, or that he holds a foot of ground more than he did when Hooker began to move." The Star says: "The honest confession of disaster would be more dignified on the part of Mr. Stanton than the silly statement of retreat from prudential considerations, or the more authoritative announcement that offensive operations will be speedily resumed." It is only in moments of disaster or disappointment there rises a general call for Fremont and the black brigades. The black brigades are filling up, and Fremont will have his day. The Herald says that Hooker had no alternative but to retreat. The Morning Post observes that the Southern Generals have been censured f
Sedgwick (search for this): article 7
ross the Rappahannock. The London Times remarks that operations, preceded by more than the usual gasconading, have been followed by the usual miserable failure, and strongly suspects that Gen. Hooker was so disabled as to make the defeat of Sedgwick rather an opportune excuse for retiring than a real disappointment. Sedgwick's corps was driven across the river on the night of Monday, and on Tuesday morning Hooker began to follow him. He had left on the field the dead and wounded in the SunSedgwick's corps was driven across the river on the night of Monday, and on Tuesday morning Hooker began to follow him. He had left on the field the dead and wounded in the Sunday's battle, which indicates plainly enough that when the Unionists were driven back in the last great struggle their retreat was something like a rout. The shattered army, consequently, had to be withdrawn with the utmost caution, and during the night it succeeded in getting away. The Times sees no end to the war but by the slow process of exhaustion either of men, or of that real enthusiasm which fights instead of preaches. The next few months must decide whether the war is to end with the
Lee (search for this): article 7
e whether the war is to end with the present year, or to drag on to the close of President Lincoln's term, or "later." The Daily News says: "The campaign south of the Rappahannock must be added to the list of Federal failures; but, although Gen. Lee announces a great victory, he does not announce that he has pursued a flying enemy, or that he holds a foot of ground more than he did when Hooker began to move." The Star says: "The honest confession of disaster would be more dignified on are filling up, and Fremont will have his day. The Herald says that Hooker had no alternative but to retreat. The Morning Post observes that the Southern Generals have been censured for not following up their victories. Considering the difficulty of replacing men out of a comparatively small population, it does not blame Lee for not renewing the attack on Hooker's lines, but does not understand how he managed to allow the Federal commander to effect his retreat with such facility.
Lincoln (search for this): article 7
the Unionists were driven back in the last great struggle their retreat was something like a rout. The shattered army, consequently, had to be withdrawn with the utmost caution, and during the night it succeeded in getting away. The Times sees no end to the war but by the slow process of exhaustion either of men, or of that real enthusiasm which fights instead of preaches. The next few months must decide whether the war is to end with the present year, or to drag on to the close of President Lincoln's term, or "later." The Daily News says: "The campaign south of the Rappahannock must be added to the list of Federal failures; but, although Gen. Lee announces a great victory, he does not announce that he has pursued a flying enemy, or that he holds a foot of ground more than he did when Hooker began to move." The Star says: "The honest confession of disaster would be more dignified on the part of Mr. Stanton than the silly statement of retreat from prudential consideration
Fremont (search for this): article 7
an the silly statement of retreat from prudential considerations, or the more authoritative announcement that offensive operations will be speedily resumed." It is only in moments of disaster or disappointment there rises a general call for Fremont and the black brigades. The black brigades are filling up, and Fremont will have his day. The Herald says that Hooker had no alternative but to retreat. The Morning Post observes that the Southern Generals have been censured for not f are filling up, and Fremont will have his day. The Herald says that Hooker had no alternative but to retreat. The Morning Post observes that the Southern Generals have been censured for not following up their victories. Considering the difficulty of replacing men out of a comparatively small population, it does not blame Lee for not renewing the attack on Hooker's lines, but does not understand how he managed to allow the Federal commander to effect his retreat with such facility.
Gen Hooker (search for this): article 7
The English press on Hooker's retreat. --The London journals, of the 23d, all comment upon Hooker's retreat across the Rappahannock. Hooker's retreat across the Rappahannock. The London Times remarks that operations, preceded by more than the usual gasconading, have been followed by the usual miserable failure, and strongly suspects that Gen. Hooker was so disabled as to make the defeat of Sedgwick rather an opportune excuse for retiring than a real diven across the river on the night of Monday, and on Tuesday morning Hooker began to follow him. He had left on the field the dead and wounded ying enemy, or that he holds a foot of ground more than he did when Hooker began to move." The Star says: "The honest confession of disasilling up, and Fremont will have his day. The Herald says that Hooker had no alternative but to retreat. The Morning Post observes tll population, it does not blame Lee for not renewing the attack on Hooker's lines, but does not understand how he managed to allow the Federa