hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity (current method)
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
United States (United States) 16 0 Browse Search
James Butler 10 0 Browse Search
William H. Duke 8 0 Browse Search
Henry W. Thomas 6 0 Browse Search
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) 6 0 Browse Search
Robert Davis 6 0 Browse Search
Imboden 5 1 Browse Search
N. M. Lee 4 0 Browse Search
Walker 4 0 Browse Search
Cedmas C. Johnson 4 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: February 11, 1864., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 7 total hits in 5 results.

March 19th, 1863 AD (search for this): article 2
before the House a communication from the President in response to a resolution of the House, inquiring upon what authority Gens. Sam Jones and Imboden have issued orders prohibiting the transmission of supplies from their departments to the city of Richmond. The President enclosed a letter from Gen. Imboden, in which he says that his action was based upon authority which he conceived was conferred by act of Congress, and General Orders from the Adjutant and Inspector General's office of March 19th and November 6th, 1863, authorizing and regulating impressments. He says that nothing but imperative necessity could have induced him to issue the order, which he knew would evoke strong opposition, and perhaps denunciation, from those whose money-making operations it would interfere with. Gen. I. says that having broken up the speculation in provisions, he, on the 24th of December, 1863, so modified the order as not to require permit for the removal from the district of supplies purchas
November 6th, 1863 AD (search for this): article 2
communication from the President in response to a resolution of the House, inquiring upon what authority Gens. Sam Jones and Imboden have issued orders prohibiting the transmission of supplies from their departments to the city of Richmond. The President enclosed a letter from Gen. Imboden, in which he says that his action was based upon authority which he conceived was conferred by act of Congress, and General Orders from the Adjutant and Inspector General's office of March 19th and November 6th, 1863, authorizing and regulating impressments. He says that nothing but imperative necessity could have induced him to issue the order, which he knew would evoke strong opposition, and perhaps denunciation, from those whose money-making operations it would interfere with. Gen. I. says that having broken up the speculation in provisions, he, on the 24th of December, 1863, so modified the order as not to require permit for the removal from the district of supplies purchased bona fide for pr
December 24th, 1863 AD (search for this): article 2
d was conferred by act of Congress, and General Orders from the Adjutant and Inspector General's office of March 19th and November 6th, 1863, authorizing and regulating impressments. He says that nothing but imperative necessity could have induced him to issue the order, which he knew would evoke strong opposition, and perhaps denunciation, from those whose money-making operations it would interfere with. Gen. I. says that having broken up the speculation in provisions, he, on the 24th of December, 1863, so modified the order as not to require permit for the removal from the district of supplies purchased bona fide for private consumption, and not for sale or speculation. He says that without resort to impressment, it is not-possible for him to procure indispensable supplies for his own command at the authorized schedule prices. Gen. Jones replies by sending a letter addressed by him to the President of the Virginia and Tennessee Railroad, in which he says that it was his only
Imboden (search for this): article 2
Prohibition of supplies to Richmond. In the House of Representatives yesterday, the Speaker laid before the House a communication from the President in response to a resolution of the House, inquiring upon what authority Gens. Sam Jones and Imboden have issued orders prohibiting the transmission of supplies from their departments to the city of Richmond. The President enclosed a letter from Gen. Imboden, in which he says that his action was based upon authority which he conceived was confGen. Imboden, in which he says that his action was based upon authority which he conceived was conferred by act of Congress, and General Orders from the Adjutant and Inspector General's office of March 19th and November 6th, 1863, authorizing and regulating impressments. He says that nothing but imperative necessity could have induced him to issue the order, which he knew would evoke strong opposition, and perhaps denunciation, from those whose money-making operations it would interfere with. Gen. I. says that having broken up the speculation in provisions, he, on the 24th of December, 1863
Sam Jones (search for this): article 2
The Prohibition of supplies to Richmond. In the House of Representatives yesterday, the Speaker laid before the House a communication from the President in response to a resolution of the House, inquiring upon what authority Gens. Sam Jones and Imboden have issued orders prohibiting the transmission of supplies from their departments to the city of Richmond. The President enclosed a letter from Gen. Imboden, in which he says that his action was based upon authority which he conceived was purchased bona fide for private consumption, and not for sale or speculation. He says that without resort to impressment, it is not-possible for him to procure indispensable supplies for his own command at the authorized schedule prices. Gen. Jones replies by sending a letter addressed by him to the President of the Virginia and Tennessee Railroad, in which he says that it was his only desire that the road should be used to the best interests of the Government and community, and should no