hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
Rodes 48 2 Browse Search
Cashtown Early 25 1 Browse Search
A. P. Hill 24 0 Browse Search
Doles 20 0 Browse Search
D. Scott 18 0 Browse Search
R. S. Ewell 15 1 Browse Search
Johnson 14 2 Browse Search
Daniel 14 2 Browse Search
A. Heintz 14 0 Browse Search
Iverson 12 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: February 22, 1864., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 109 total hits in 67 results.

1 2 3 4 5 6 ...
United States (United States) (search for this): article 12
a law granting equality of privileges to colored people on the railroads of the District. He called attention to the subject for the reason that an outrage was recently committed in this District upon an officer with the rank of Major of the United States service. This officer had been recently ejected from one of those street cars by the conductor. because he was a black man. He thought we had better break up all railroads if we would not have them carried on without such outrages, which di Van Winkle--12. The loyal member from Kentucky would like a few slaves to be Spared. Mr. Stevens offered an amendment to the Conscription bill, that persons of African descent, between 20 and 45 years of age, whether citizens of the United States or not, shall be enrolled and form part of the national forces, and when a slave shall be drafted and mustered into the service, the master shall receive a certificate for $300, and the drafted man shall be free. This Mr. Stevens said wo
Delaware (Delaware, United States) (search for this): article 12
zens of other States are used for national purposes. Mr. Creswell (Md.) favored the amendment, stating that the slaveholders in the State of Maryland have furnished but few if any men for the war. Mr. Farnsworth (Ill.) said he would not put money into the pockets of slaveholders. It was their duty to put their slaves into the army without compensation. We put our sons into the army, and why should they not give their slaves. Mr. Smithers (Del.) would say to the gentleman from Kentucky (Mr. Clay) that the people of his State had no such scruples as the people of Kentucky are represented to have. There would be nothing more welcome to Delaware than to take her slaves from her. Mr. Mallory briefly maintained that according to the Constitution private property, including slaves, cannot be taken for public uses without compensation. Mr. Havis (Md) maintained that slaves do military duty, and therefore we do not owe the slaveholders anything for their services.
Morris, N. Y. (New York, United States) (search for this): article 12
evens would withdraw his amendment. A good feeling was now prevailing in his State, and the adoption of this proposition would retard the progress of the Union feeling. He did not object to taking rebel property, but that of loyal men ought not to be interfered with. Mr. Boutwell (Mass.) said the laws of all the States recognize slaves as persons and not as property, and the exigency has arrived when we should use them as other men are used for putting down the rebellion. Mr. Morris (N. Y.) favored the amendment, not being able to see why that description of property should be exempted, while the property of citizens of other States are used for national purposes. Mr. Creswell (Md.) favored the amendment, stating that the slaveholders in the State of Maryland have furnished but few if any men for the war. Mr. Farnsworth (Ill.) said he would not put money into the pockets of slaveholders. It was their duty to put their slaves into the army without compensation. W
Kansas (Kansas, United States) (search for this): article 12
at the Senator from Massachusetts had now plainly presented the issue before the country. Mr. Wilson said he had no desire to force equality on the Senator from Indiana. What he wanted was to let every man assume the station God intended him to attain. The yeas and nays were ordered, and resulted as follows: Yeas.--Messrs. Anthony, Brown, Chandler, Clark, Collamer, Conness, Cowan, Dixon, Fessenden, Foot, Foster, Grimes, Hale, Harland, Harris, Howard, Howe, Lane, (Ind.,) Lane, (Kansas,) Morgan, Morrill, Pomeroy, Ramsey, Sherman, Sprague, Sumner, Ten Eyck, Trumbull, Wade, Wilkinson, Willey, Wilson--34. Nays.--Messrs. Buckalew, Davis, Harding, Hendricks, Nesmith. Powell, Richardson, Riddle, Saulsbury, Van Winkle--12. The loyal member from Kentucky would like a few slaves to be Spared. Mr. Stevens offered an amendment to the Conscription bill, that persons of African descent, between 20 and 45 years of age, whether citizens of the United States or not, shall be
Virginia (Virginia, United States) (search for this): article 12
looking over the debates of the Yankee Congress for the past two weeks we find some matters which are amusing to the people of the Confederacy: Mr. Carlile on "the State of the Union"--Virginia in his debasement. Mr. Carlile, (Va.) said that in these unhappy times, when good men were rendered odious and had men popular, when great men are made little and little men great, he who would serve his country best must be above personal consideration. He paid a glowing tribute to the State of Virginia, and said, that, even in her debasement, the challenged our admiration for the gallantry of her sons on many an honorable field. He did not believe there would be an early cessation of hostilities, nor did he believe that the starvation on which the rebels for three years have subsisted was likely to result in an early death. (Laughter.) The Union could never be restored by the mere exercise of the coercive powers of the Federal Government. We had reached a point where the natu
Indiana (Indiana, United States) (search for this): article 12
on the white race.--The people would never adopt that sentiment. He was glad that the Senator from Massachusetts had now plainly presented the issue before the country. Mr. Wilson said he had no desire to force equality on the Senator from Indiana. What he wanted was to let every man assume the station God intended him to attain. The yeas and nays were ordered, and resulted as follows: Yeas.--Messrs. Anthony, Brown, Chandler, Clark, Collamer, Conness, Cowan, Dixon, Fessenden, Foot, Foster, Grimes, Hale, Harland, Harris, Howard, Howe, Lane, (Ind.,) Lane, (Kansas,) Morgan, Morrill, Pomeroy, Ramsey, Sherman, Sprague, Sumner, Ten Eyck, Trumbull, Wade, Wilkinson, Willey, Wilson--34. Nays.--Messrs. Buckalew, Davis, Harding, Hendricks, Nesmith. Powell, Richardson, Riddle, Saulsbury, Van Winkle--12. The loyal member from Kentucky would like a few slaves to be Spared. Mr. Stevens offered an amendment to the Conscription bill, that persons of African descent, betwe
Clay (Kentucky, United States) (search for this): article 12
es to be Spared. Mr. Stevens offered an amendment to the Conscription bill, that persons of African descent, between 20 and 45 years of age, whether citizens of the United States or not, shall be enrolled and form part of the national forces, and when a slave shall be drafted and mustered into the service, the master shall receive a certificate for $300, and the drafted man shall be free. This Mr. Stevens said would give compensation to masters in the loyal border States. Mr. Clay (Ky.) hoped that Mr. Stevens would withdraw his amendment. A good feeling was now prevailing in his State, and the adoption of this proposition would retard the progress of the Union feeling. He did not object to taking rebel property, but that of loyal men ought not to be interfered with. Mr. Boutwell (Mass.) said the laws of all the States recognize slaves as persons and not as property, and the exigency has arrived when we should use them as other men are used for putting down the rebe
Massachusetts (Massachusetts, United States) (search for this): article 12
nformation of an outrage perpetrated on a mail railroad, where two colored men were ejected from an empty car, and forced into a cattle car. This was a part of the malignant system of slavery, but the country was being rapidly abolitionized and civilized. Mr. Hendricks believed, from the expressions he had heard to day, that social as well as political equality was to be forced upon the white race.--The people would never adopt that sentiment. He was glad that the Senator from Massachusetts had now plainly presented the issue before the country. Mr. Wilson said he had no desire to force equality on the Senator from Indiana. What he wanted was to let every man assume the station God intended him to attain. The yeas and nays were ordered, and resulted as follows: Yeas.--Messrs. Anthony, Brown, Chandler, Clark, Collamer, Conness, Cowan, Dixon, Fessenden, Foot, Foster, Grimes, Hale, Harland, Harris, Howard, Howe, Lane, (Ind.,) Lane, (Kansas,) Morgan, Morrill, Pom
Maryland (Maryland, United States) (search for this): article 12
Boutwell (Mass.) said the laws of all the States recognize slaves as persons and not as property, and the exigency has arrived when we should use them as other men are used for putting down the rebellion. Mr. Morris (N. Y.) favored the amendment, not being able to see why that description of property should be exempted, while the property of citizens of other States are used for national purposes. Mr. Creswell (Md.) favored the amendment, stating that the slaveholders in the State of Maryland have furnished but few if any men for the war. Mr. Farnsworth (Ill.) said he would not put money into the pockets of slaveholders. It was their duty to put their slaves into the army without compensation. We put our sons into the army, and why should they not give their slaves. Mr. Smithers (Del.) would say to the gentleman from Kentucky (Mr. Clay) that the people of his State had no such scruples as the people of Kentucky are represented to have. There would be nothing mo
Creswell (Maryland, United States) (search for this): article 12
bel property, but that of loyal men ought not to be interfered with. Mr. Boutwell (Mass.) said the laws of all the States recognize slaves as persons and not as property, and the exigency has arrived when we should use them as other men are used for putting down the rebellion. Mr. Morris (N. Y.) favored the amendment, not being able to see why that description of property should be exempted, while the property of citizens of other States are used for national purposes. Mr. Creswell (Md.) favored the amendment, stating that the slaveholders in the State of Maryland have furnished but few if any men for the war. Mr. Farnsworth (Ill.) said he would not put money into the pockets of slaveholders. It was their duty to put their slaves into the army without compensation. We put our sons into the army, and why should they not give their slaves. Mr. Smithers (Del.) would say to the gentleman from Kentucky (Mr. Clay) that the people of his State had no such scruples a
1 2 3 4 5 6 ...